Mid-20th century baby boom: Difference between revisions
Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) m Reverted edits by TreadingWater (talk) to last version by Arthur Rubin |
please see talk page for explanation of this edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{For| the |
{{For| the generation born during the earlier part of the Post-WWII baby boom | Baby Boom Generation}} |
||
{{For| the generation born during the later part of the Post-WWII baby boom |Generation Jones}} |
|||
As is often the case after a major war, the end of [[World War II]] brought a [[baby boom]] to many countries, notably those in [[Europe]], [[Asia]], [[North America]], and [[Australasia]].{{Fact|date=December 2008}} There is some disagreement as to the precise beginning and ending dates of the post-war baby boom, but it is most often agreed to begin in the years immediately after the war, ending more than a decade later; birth rates in the United States started to decline in 1957. |
|||
In May 1951, [[Sylvia Porter]], a columnist for the ''[[New York Post]]'', used the term "boom" to refer to the phenomenon of increased births in post war America. She wrote: |
In May 1951, [[Sylvia Porter]], a columnist for the ''[[New York Post]]'', used the term "boom" to refer to the phenomenon of increased births in post war America. She wrote: |
||
<blockquote>Take the 3,548,000 babies born in 1950. Bundle them into a batch, bounce them all over the bountiful land that is America. What do you get? Boom. The biggest, boomiest boom ever known in history.<ref>From "Babies Equal Boom, ''New York Post'', May 4, 1951.</ref></blockquote> |
<blockquote>Take the 3,548,000 babies born in 1950. Bundle them into a batch, bounce them all over the bountiful land that is America. What do you get? Boom. The biggest, boomiest boom ever known in history.<ref>From "Babies Equal Boom, ''New York Post'', May 4, 1951.</ref></blockquote> |
||
Many analysts now argue that two distinct cultural generations were born during this baby boom; the older one called the [[Baby Boom Generation]] and a younger generation called [[Generation Jones]].<ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped1022pageoct22,0,2775732.column</ref><ref>http://pundits.thehill.com/2008/10/23/why-the-%E2%80%98generation-jones%E2%80%99-vote-may-be-crucial-in-election-2008/</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSB5l3t1iRA</ref><ref>http://www.newsweek.com/id/107583</ref> There are an estimated 78.2 million Americans who were born during the demographic boom in births.<ref>U.S. Census Bureau [http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006105.html "Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!"] (3 January 2006)</ref> |
|||
There are an estimated 77.3 million Americans who were born during this demographic boom in births.<ref>[http://www.boomerslife.org/baby_boom_population_us_census_bureau_by_state.htm Baby Boom Population – U.S. Census Bureau – USA and by State] (1 July 2008). Retrieved on 2009-05-18.</ref> Baby Boomers are now middle age and entering senior years. In the economy, many are now retiring and leaving the [[labor force]]. |
|||
Baby Boomers are now middle age and entering senior years. In the economy, many are now retiring and leaving the [[labor force]]. |
|||
<!--spacing, please do not remove--> |
<!--spacing, please do not remove--> |
||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
| title = Comparisons of 20th Century U.S. Population Growth by Decade |
| title = Comparisons of 20th Century U.S. Population Growth by Decade |
||
| url = http://www.numbersusa.com/overpopulation/decadegraph.html |
| url = http://www.numbersusa.com/overpopulation/decadegraph.html |
||
| accessdate = 2007-02-03}}</ref> While austerity and restraint were the norms during the stress of the war years, after the war, couples reunited and returned to traditional roles. Returning (mostly male) soldiers re-entered the workforce; many women left wartime work to concentrate on child-bearing and child-rearing. Marriage became again a cultural and career norm for most women, and the result was an increase in the birth rate. |
| accessdate = 2007-02-03}}</ref> While austerity and restraint were the norms during the stress of the war years, after the war, couples reunited and returned to traditional roles. Returning (mostly male) soldiers re-entered the workforce; many women left wartime work to concentrate on child-bearing and child-rearing. Marriage became again a cultural and career norm for most women, and the result was an increase in the birth rate. |
||
The boom continued in the economic glow of the fifties, but dampened its rate as the recession of 1958 sloughed into the following recovery. One theory about the end of the baby boom is that it petered out as the biological capacity of boomer parents took its course. The key biological factor is female fertility. Women are fertile only into their mid-forties, and simple mathematics indicates that a woman married in her mid-to-late twenties after the war ended in 1945 would remain fertile for approximately another 20 years. The advent of the [[combined oral contraceptive pill|birth control pill]] in 1960 in the U.S. also contributed to the slowing birth rate, as previous contraceptive methods were less popular or reliable. |
The boom continued in the economic glow of the fifties, but dampened its rate as the recession of 1958 sloughed into the following recovery. One theory about the end of the baby boom is that it petered out as the biological capacity of boomer parents took its course. The key biological factor is female fertility. Women are fertile only into their mid-forties, and simple mathematics indicates that a woman married in her mid-to-late twenties after the war ended in 1945 would remain fertile for approximately another 20 years. The advent of the [[combined oral contraceptive pill|birth control pill]] in 1960 in the U.S. also contributed to the slowing birth rate, as previous contraceptive methods were less popular or reliable. |
||
Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
==In the United States== |
==In the United States== |
||
In the United States alone, approximately 76 million babies were born between those years. In 1946, live births in the U.S. surged from 222,721 in January to 339,499 in October. By the end of the 1940s, about 32 million babies had been born, compared with 24 million in the 1930s. In 1954, annual births first topped four million and did not drop below that figure until 1965, when four out of ten Americans were under the age of twenty.<ref> Figures in Landon Y. Jones, "Swinging 60s?" in ''Smithsonian Magazine'', January 2006, pp |
In the United States alone, approximately 76 million babies were born between those years. In 1946, live births in the U.S. surged from 222,721 in January to 339,499 in October. By the end of the 1940s, about 32 million babies had been born, compared with 24 million in the 1930s. In 1954, annual births first topped four million and did not drop below that figure until 1965, when four out of ten Americans were under the age of twenty.<ref> Figures in Landon Y. Jones, "Swinging 60s?" in ''Smithsonian Magazine'', January 2006, pp 102–107.</ref> |
||
In the years after the war, couples who could not afford families during the Great Depression made up for lost time; the mood was now optimistic. During the war unemployment ended and the economy greatly expanded; afterwards the country experienced vigorous economic growth until the 1970s. The G.I. Bill enabled record numbers of people to finish high school and attend college. This led to an increase in stock of skills and yielded higher incomes to families. |
In the years after the war, couples who could not afford families during the Great Depression made up for lost time; the mood was now optimistic. During the war unemployment ended and the economy greatly expanded; afterwards the country experienced vigorous economic growth until the 1970s. The G.I. Bill enabled record numbers of people to finish high school and attend college. This led to an increase in stock of skills and yielded higher incomes to families. |
||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
It is important to distinguish between the demographic boom in births, and the actual generations born during that period. This article deals with the demographic birth boom, not generations. |
It is important to distinguish between the demographic boom in births, and the actual generations born during that period. This article deals with the demographic birth boom, not generations. |
||
The [[United States Census Bureau]] defines the demographic birth boom as between 1946 and 1964. <ref>[http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006105.html U.S. Census Bureau |
The [[United States Census Bureau]] defines the demographic birth boom as between 1946 and 1964. <ref>[http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/006105.html U.S. Census Bureau — Oldest Boomers Turn 60 (2006)]</ref> |
||
In Canada, one influential attempt to define the boom came from [[David Foot]], author of ''Boom, Bust and Echo: Profiting from the Demographic Shift in the 21st Century'', published in 1997 and 2000. He defines the Canadian boom as 1947 to 1966, the years that more than 400,000 babies were born.<ref>[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060623.dates24/BNStory/BabyBoomers/home By definition: Boom, bust, X and why]</ref> Doug Owram argues that the demographic Canadian boom took place from 1946 to 1962 |
In Canada, one influential attempt to define the boom came from [[David Foot]], author of ''Boom, Bust and Echo: Profiting from the Demographic Shift in the 21st Century'', published in 1997 and 2000. He defines the Canadian boom as 1947 to 1966, the years that more than 400,000 babies were born.<ref>[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060623.dates24/BNStory/BabyBoomers/home By definition: Boom, bust, X and why]</ref>. Doug Owram argues that the demographic Canadian boom took place from 1946 to 1962<ref name=Owram1997b>{{Citation |
||
| last = Owram | first = Doug |
| last = Owram | first = Doug |
||
| year = 1997 |
| year = 1997 |
||
Line 49: | Line 53: | ||
}}</ref><ref>http://clrc.gov.au/agd/EMA/rwpattach.nsf/viewasattachmentpersonal/(C86520E41F5EA5C8AAB6E66B851038D8)~1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf/$file/1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf</ref> |
}}</ref><ref>http://clrc.gov.au/agd/EMA/rwpattach.nsf/viewasattachmentpersonal/(C86520E41F5EA5C8AAB6E66B851038D8)~1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf/$file/1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf</ref> |
||
The exact beginning and end of the baby boom can be debated. In the [[United States]], demographers usually use 1946 to 1964, although the U.S. birthrate began to shoot up in 1941 and to decline after 1957. By 1948 |
The exact beginning and end of the baby boom can be debated. In the [[United States]], demographers usually use 1946 to 1964, although the U.S. birthrate began to shoot up in 1941 and to decline after 1957. By 1948 the US population increase was back to the pre-Depression increase rate of about 1.5% per year. |
||
[[Image:Birthratechart stretch.PNG|thumb|525px|center|Number of births in the United States, 1934 to present]] |
[[Image:Birthratechart stretch.PNG|thumb|525px|center|Number of births in the United States, 1934 to present]] |
||
Based on US census information [http://www.census.gov/population/www/]: |
Based on US census information [http://www.census.gov/population/www/]: |
||
Line 58: | Line 64: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" |
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:right;" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! Year |
! Year |
||
! US resident population<br>(thousands) |
! US resident population<br>(thousands) |
||
! Net change<br>(thousands) |
! Net change<br>(thousands) |
||
Line 65: | Line 71: | ||
| 1941 || 133,121 || 1,161 || 0.88 |
| 1941 || 133,121 || 1,161 || 0.88 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1942 || 133,920 || 799 || 0.60 |
| 1942 || 133,920 || 799 || 0.60 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1943 || 134,245 || 325 || 0.24 |
| 1943 || 134,245 || 325 || 0.24 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1944 || 132,885 || −1,360 || −1.01 |
| 1944 || 132,885 || −1,360 || −1.01 |
||
Line 73: | Line 79: | ||
| 1945 || 132,481 || −404 || −0.30 |
| 1945 || 132,481 || −404 || −0.30 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1946 || 140,054 || 7,573 || 5.72 |
| 1946 || 140,054 || 7,573 || 5.72 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1947 || 143,446 || 3,392 || 2.42 |
| 1947 || 143,446 || 3,392 || 2.42 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1948 || 146,093 || 2,647 || 1.85 |
| 1948 || 146,093 || 2,647 || 1.85 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1949 || 148,665 || 2,572 || 1.76 |
| 1949 || 148,665 || 2,572 || 1.76 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| 1950 || 151,868 || 3,203 || 2.15 |
| 1950 || 151,868 || 3,203 || 2.15 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|10 year average || - || 1,991 || 1.43 |
|10 year average || - || 1,991 || 1.43 |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|} |
|} |
||
Line 99: | Line 105: | ||
==In Canada== |
==In Canada== |
||
In [[Canada]], the baby boom is usually defined as |
In [[Canada]], the baby boom is usually defined as occuring 1947 to 1966. Canadian soldiers were repatriated later than American servicemen, and Canada's birthrate did not start to rise until 1947. Most Canadian demographers prefer to use the later date of 1966 as the boom's end in that country. The later end than the US is ascribed to a later adoption of birth control pills. |
||
==In the United Kingdom== |
==In the United Kingdom== |
||
The [[United Kingdom]] experienced a second ''baby boom'' during the 1960s, with a peak in births in 1965 and a third (smaller) one in the late 1980s. The two peaks can clearly be seen in the UK population pyramids.<ref>[http://www.statistics.gov.uk/populationestimates/svg_pyramid/default.htm UK population pyramids].</ref> |
The [[United Kingdom]] experienced a second ''baby boom'' during the 1960s, with a peak in births in 1965 and a third (smaller) one in the late 1980s. The two peaks can clearly be seen in the UK population pyramids.<ref>[http://www.statistics.gov.uk/populationestimates/svg_pyramid/default.htm UK population pyramids].</ref> |
||
==European and South-Pacific trends== |
== European and South-Pacific trends == |
||
Many European countries, Australia and New Zealand also experienced a baby boom. In some cases the total fertility rate almost doubled. The American birth model, conceived by demographer [[Frank Notestein]], was punctuated by an end to the upsurge in births and a return to pre-war levels. Prior to WWII, fertility rates in Europe and America were on a general decline due to improved nutrition and medicine, and a surge in births were previously not experienced at such a large scale. Based on this model, baby boom years for other countries regarded for having a baby boom are as follows: |
Many European countries, Australia and New Zealand also experienced a baby boom. In some cases the total fertility rate almost doubled. The American birth model, conceived by demographer [[Frank Notestein]], was punctuated by an end to the upsurge in births and a return to pre-war levels. Prior to WWII, fertility rates in Europe and America were on a general decline due to improved nutrition and medicine, and a surge in births were previously not experienced at such a large scale. Based on this model, baby boom years for other countries regarded for having a baby boom are as follows: |
||
[[Image:Hungary pp 1960.png|thumb|300px|right|Hungary's population pyramid in 1960 with boom generations]] |
|||
*France 1946–1974 |
*France 1946–1974 |
||
*United Kingdom 1946–1971 |
*United Kingdom 1946–1971 |
||
*Finland 1945–1950 |
*Finland 1945–1950 |
||
*Germany 1955-1967 |
*Germany 1955-1967 |
||
*Sweden 1946–1952 |
*Sweden 1946–1952 |
||
*Denmark 1946–1950 |
*Denmark 1946–1950 |
||
*Netherlands 1946–1972 |
*Netherlands 1946–1972 |
||
*Ireland 1946–1982 |
*Ireland 1946–1982 |
||
*Hungary 1946-1957 |
|||
*Iceland 1946–1969 |
*Iceland 1946–1969 |
||
*New Zealand 1946–1965 |
*New Zealand 1946–1965 |
||
Line 121: | Line 125: | ||
In some of these examples, an "echo boom" followed some time after as the offspring of the initial boom gave rise to a second increase, with a baby "bust" in between. The birth years of the baby boom as noted being both short and long lived, creates what many believe to be a myth to the notion of defining baby boomers as one "generation", as a unified concept is clearly not possible. Indeed, multiple generations may be present in a single country such as Ireland where the boom lasted 36 years. This overlapping effect of generations is not illuminated when considering crude fertility rates. The only common ground for the collective boom is the same approximate starting year. This example can be applied to each state in the United States on an individual basis. The states with a census in place in 1946 saw fertility rates drop to pre-war levels throughout the 1960s, with the average being in 1964. |
In some of these examples, an "echo boom" followed some time after as the offspring of the initial boom gave rise to a second increase, with a baby "bust" in between. The birth years of the baby boom as noted being both short and long lived, creates what many believe to be a myth to the notion of defining baby boomers as one "generation", as a unified concept is clearly not possible. Indeed, multiple generations may be present in a single country such as Ireland where the boom lasted 36 years. This overlapping effect of generations is not illuminated when considering crude fertility rates. The only common ground for the collective boom is the same approximate starting year. This example can be applied to each state in the United States on an individual basis. The states with a census in place in 1946 saw fertility rates drop to pre-war levels throughout the 1960s, with the average being in 1964. |
||
==See also== |
== See also == |
||
*[[Demographics of France]] |
*[[Demographics of France]] |
||
*[[Baby |
*[[Baby Boom]] |
||
*[[ |
*[[Baby boomers]] |
||
*[[Generation Jones]] |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Line 130: | Line 135: | ||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
[[hr:Poslijeratni Baby Boom]] |
|||
[[mk:Бејби-бум]] |
[[mk:Бејби-бум]] |
||
[[fi:Suuret ikäluokat]] |
[[fi:Suuret ikäluokat]] |
||
[[Category:Demographics]] |
|||
[[Category:20th century]] |
|||
[[Category:20th-century births]] |
Revision as of 23:10, 2 October 2009
As is often the case after a major war, the end of World War II brought a baby boom to many countries, notably those in Europe, Asia, North America, and Australasia.[citation needed] There is some disagreement as to the precise beginning and ending dates of the post-war baby boom, but it is most often agreed to begin in the years immediately after the war, ending more than a decade later; birth rates in the United States started to decline in 1957.
In May 1951, Sylvia Porter, a columnist for the New York Post, used the term "boom" to refer to the phenomenon of increased births in post war America. She wrote:
Take the 3,548,000 babies born in 1950. Bundle them into a batch, bounce them all over the bountiful land that is America. What do you get? Boom. The biggest, boomiest boom ever known in history.[1]
Many analysts now argue that two distinct cultural generations were born during this baby boom; the older one called the Baby Boom Generation and a younger generation called Generation Jones.[2][3][4][5][6] There are an estimated 78.2 million Americans who were born during the demographic boom in births.[7]
Baby Boomers are now middle age and entering senior years. In the economy, many are now retiring and leaving the labor force.
Causes
Before the Baby Boom, there was a period of approximately 20 years in which having children was difficult because of the effects of the Great Depression and World War II. The Baby Boom reflected the sudden removal of economic and social restraints that kept people from starting families.[8] While austerity and restraint were the norms during the stress of the war years, after the war, couples reunited and returned to traditional roles. Returning (mostly male) soldiers re-entered the workforce; many women left wartime work to concentrate on child-bearing and child-rearing. Marriage became again a cultural and career norm for most women, and the result was an increase in the birth rate.
The boom continued in the economic glow of the fifties, but dampened its rate as the recession of 1958 sloughed into the following recovery. One theory about the end of the baby boom is that it petered out as the biological capacity of boomer parents took its course. The key biological factor is female fertility. Women are fertile only into their mid-forties, and simple mathematics indicates that a woman married in her mid-to-late twenties after the war ended in 1945 would remain fertile for approximately another 20 years. The advent of the birth control pill in 1960 in the U.S. also contributed to the slowing birth rate, as previous contraceptive methods were less popular or reliable.
In the United States
In the United States alone, approximately 76 million babies were born between those years. In 1946, live births in the U.S. surged from 222,721 in January to 339,499 in October. By the end of the 1940s, about 32 million babies had been born, compared with 24 million in the 1930s. In 1954, annual births first topped four million and did not drop below that figure until 1965, when four out of ten Americans were under the age of twenty.[9]
In the years after the war, couples who could not afford families during the Great Depression made up for lost time; the mood was now optimistic. During the war unemployment ended and the economy greatly expanded; afterwards the country experienced vigorous economic growth until the 1970s. The G.I. Bill enabled record numbers of people to finish high school and attend college. This led to an increase in stock of skills and yielded higher incomes to families.
Definition of the boom years
It is important to distinguish between the demographic boom in births, and the actual generations born during that period. This article deals with the demographic birth boom, not generations.
The United States Census Bureau defines the demographic birth boom as between 1946 and 1964. [10]
In Canada, one influential attempt to define the boom came from David Foot, author of Boom, Bust and Echo: Profiting from the Demographic Shift in the 21st Century, published in 1997 and 2000. He defines the Canadian boom as 1947 to 1966, the years that more than 400,000 babies were born.[11]. Doug Owram argues that the demographic Canadian boom took place from 1946 to 1962[12]
Bernard Salt places the Australian baby boom between 1946 and 1961.[13][14]
The exact beginning and end of the baby boom can be debated. In the United States, demographers usually use 1946 to 1964, although the U.S. birthrate began to shoot up in 1941 and to decline after 1957. By 1948 the US population increase was back to the pre-Depression increase rate of about 1.5% per year.
Based on US census information [1]:
- US Involvement in World War II (+ 5 post boomer years)
Year | US resident population (thousands) |
Net change (thousands) |
Percent change |
---|---|---|---|
1941 | 133,121 | 1,161 | 0.88 |
1942 | 133,920 | 799 | 0.60 |
1943 | 134,245 | 325 | 0.24 |
1944 | 132,885 | −1,360 | −1.01 |
1945 | 132,481 | −404 | −0.30 |
1946 | 140,054 | 7,573 | 5.72 |
1947 | 143,446 | 3,392 | 2.42 |
1948 | 146,093 | 2,647 | 1.85 |
1949 | 148,665 | 2,572 | 1.76 |
1950 | 151,868 | 3,203 | 2.15 |
10 year average | - | 1,991 | 1.43 |
The five percent "baby boom" increase of 1946 and the trickle into 1947 barely impacted the US population growth rate between 1900 and 2004.
Marriage rates
Marriage rate rose sharply in the 1940s and reached all time highs. After WWII Americans began to marry at a younger age, the average age of a person at their first marriage dropped to 22.5 years for males and 20.1 for females, down from 24.3 for males and 21.5 for females in 1940. [15] Getting married immediately after high school was becoming commonplace and women were increasingly under tremendous pressure to marry by the age of 20. A common stereotype stated that women were going to college to earn their M.R.S. (Mrs.) degree.[16]
Family size
Family size increased sharply throughout the baby boom, the average woman bore 3.09 children in 1950 which increased to 3.65 children per family in 1960, but the peak was in 1957, when the figure stood at 3.77. Most couples became pregnant with their first child within 7 months of their wedding; between 1940 to 1960, the number of families with three children doubled and the number of families having a fourth child quadrupled.
Easterlin Models
Economist and demographer Richard Easterlin in his "Twentieth Century American Population Growth" (2000), explains the growth pattern of American population in the twentieth century by examining the fertility rate fluctuations and the decreasing mortality rate. Easterlin attempts to prove the cause of the Baby Boom and Baby Bust by the “relative income” theory, despite the various other theories that these events have been attributed to. The “relative income” theory suggests that couples choose to have children based on a couple’s ratio of potential earning power and the desire to obtain material objects. This ratio depends on the economic stability of country and how people are raised to value material objects. The “relative income” theory explains the Baby Boom by suggesting that the late 1940s and 1950s brought low desires to have material objects, because of the Great Depression and WWII, as well as huge job opportunities, because of being a post war period. These two factors gave rise to a high relative income, which encouraged high fertility. Following this period, the next generation had a greater desire for material objects, however, an economic slowdown in the United States, made jobs harder to acquire. This resulted in lower fertility rates causing the Baby Bust.[17]
In Canada
In Canada, the baby boom is usually defined as occuring 1947 to 1966. Canadian soldiers were repatriated later than American servicemen, and Canada's birthrate did not start to rise until 1947. Most Canadian demographers prefer to use the later date of 1966 as the boom's end in that country. The later end than the US is ascribed to a later adoption of birth control pills.
In the United Kingdom
The United Kingdom experienced a second baby boom during the 1960s, with a peak in births in 1965 and a third (smaller) one in the late 1980s. The two peaks can clearly be seen in the UK population pyramids.[18]
European and South-Pacific trends
Many European countries, Australia and New Zealand also experienced a baby boom. In some cases the total fertility rate almost doubled. The American birth model, conceived by demographer Frank Notestein, was punctuated by an end to the upsurge in births and a return to pre-war levels. Prior to WWII, fertility rates in Europe and America were on a general decline due to improved nutrition and medicine, and a surge in births were previously not experienced at such a large scale. Based on this model, baby boom years for other countries regarded for having a baby boom are as follows:
- France 1946–1974
- United Kingdom 1946–1971
- Finland 1945–1950
- Germany 1955-1967
- Sweden 1946–1952
- Denmark 1946–1950
- Netherlands 1946–1972
- Ireland 1946–1982
- Iceland 1946–1969
- New Zealand 1946–1965
- Australia 1946–1965
In some of these examples, an "echo boom" followed some time after as the offspring of the initial boom gave rise to a second increase, with a baby "bust" in between. The birth years of the baby boom as noted being both short and long lived, creates what many believe to be a myth to the notion of defining baby boomers as one "generation", as a unified concept is clearly not possible. Indeed, multiple generations may be present in a single country such as Ireland where the boom lasted 36 years. This overlapping effect of generations is not illuminated when considering crude fertility rates. The only common ground for the collective boom is the same approximate starting year. This example can be applied to each state in the United States on an individual basis. The states with a census in place in 1946 saw fertility rates drop to pre-war levels throughout the 1960s, with the average being in 1964.
See also
References
Notes
- ^ From "Babies Equal Boom, New York Post, May 4, 1951.
- ^ http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped1022pageoct22,0,2775732.column
- ^ http://pundits.thehill.com/2008/10/23/why-the-%E2%80%98generation-jones%E2%80%99-vote-may-be-crucial-in-election-2008/
- ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ta_Du5K0jk
- ^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSB5l3t1iRA
- ^ http://www.newsweek.com/id/107583
- ^ U.S. Census Bureau "Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!" (3 January 2006)
- ^ "Comparisons of 20th Century U.S. Population Growth by Decade". Retrieved 2007-02-03.
- ^ Figures in Landon Y. Jones, "Swinging 60s?" in Smithsonian Magazine, January 2006, pp 102–107.
- ^ U.S. Census Bureau — Oldest Boomers Turn 60 (2006)
- ^ By definition: Boom, bust, X and why
- ^ Owram, Doug (1997), Born at the Right Time, Toronto: University Of Toronto Press, p. xiv, ISBN 0802080863
- ^ Salt, Bernard (2004), The Big Shift, South Yarra, Vic.: Hardie Grant Books, ISBN 9781740661881
- ^ http://clrc.gov.au/agd/EMA/rwpattach.nsf/viewasattachmentpersonal/(C86520E41F5EA5C8AAB6E66B851038D8)~1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf/$file/1103BookreviewNotesfield.pdf
- ^ "Median Age at First Marriage, 1890–2006". Infoplease. Retrieved 2008-07-22.
- ^ "People & Events: Mrs. America: Women's Roles in the 1950s". PBS. Retrieved 2008-07-22.
- ^ See Richard A. Easterlin, Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare (1987)
- ^ UK population pyramids.