User talk:Atif.t2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:25, 13 October 2009

Law & Order episodes (season 1) The Torrents of Greed (part 1)

I removed the list of episodes in the top-right corner because: 1) it is already contained in the "list of Law & Order episodes (season 1) page, and; 2) I have not seen such a list in the top-right corner of any other episode page.

I am certainly open to feedback. Thank you.

Hi Jdlankin, please mention the Article name or the link. Also please sign your talk by typing four tildes. Atif.t2 (talk) 18:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Militia

I removed that stuff from the Michigan Militia page because it is spam. Do you even look at what you're complaining about? It is information that is not part of the organization that was the michigan militia in the 90s. One person keeps spamming the article with their links and info on their own small militia group. WTF.65.23.82.10 (talk) 23:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you could please check the article it has been reverted to your version already.

Also please clearly mention what are you doing in your edit summaries.

PS don't forget to check your talk page. Atif.t2 (talk) 23:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For reverting the vandalism on my userpage. ^(C/SGT)G2sai_(talk) 01:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the star! Atif.t2 (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

I'm not the most keen on Wikipedia policies but I'm pretty sure you aren't allowed to just undo suggestions I make on the talk page just cause you aren't happy with the suggestion (or whyever you decided to undo my suggestion).

So, please don't, I don't want this to be a revert war, it was very rude. Avalik (talk) 22:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Avalik, I was reverting the vandalized page but you seem to have reverted it just a second sooner. Due to this it was roll backed to vandalized stage. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks for the notice. Atif.t2 (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alrighty then. I'm unsure what that means really hehe, but sorry for the accusation in that case. :) Avalik (talk) 22:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Thanks for the barnstar, I really appreciate it. ^(C/SSG)G2sai_(talk) 20:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why my informative edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztek is reverted as unconstructive

Please explain why my informative edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aztek is reverted as unconstructive.

BR. Henrik

Hi Henrik, It is already mentioned in the article regarding the Car. There is no need to add it in the disambiguation page. Atif.t2 (talk) 20:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks my good friend 62.6.149.17 (talk) 21:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are faster than a bot - well done. Nasnema (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Lewis

You reverted my deletion of content from Oliver Lewis. You were wrong. Oliver Lewis was an African-American jockey. The material I removed was related to the hoax discography of a nonexistent British singer. I have now reverted your reversion of my anti-hoax edit. I am aware that many IP are vandals, but you need to be more careful with your edits. 75.69.0.58 (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would had been better if you would have mentioned it being hoax in edit summary again after removing the content. Anyway thanks for bringing it to my notice. Atif.t2 (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your anti-vandalism efforts...

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		...deserve this. Until It Sleeps ^{T • C} 23:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the star! Atif.t2 (talk) 01:01, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted, reported, rewarded

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You beat me to a revert and a WP:AIV report. For speedy reaction to vandalism, I speedily award you this barnstar. Take care! --Delta1989 (talk) 00:26, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the star! Atif.t2 (talk) 01:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit in the khalistan movement article,the edit was justified as the operation was at night and the pilgirms were not praying.Though i fully agree with the death of pilgrims as mentioned in various articles and books they were not killed while praying.Secondly it was not a military embaressement as the army captured the place by morning of 7th october.It was a political embaressement.Please go through the refrences already give and you will find that no new refrences are needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.112.73 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit you had removed mention of civilians caught in the crossfire which should be there.

In your edit please include the line unless you can provide such refrence. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, finally got someones attention. Please remove all names from the recent mos eisley edit summaries. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.209.20 (talk) 22:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please contact an admin for this request. They will be able to help you further. Follow the link [[1]] Atif.t2 (talk) 22:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out my fault.I will do so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.236.112.73 (talk) 21:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're fast! Thanks for reverting on The chaos faction. That seems to be being over-vandalized for some reason. --Delta1989 (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment Atif.t2 (talk) 01:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AmeriHealth revert

A reply to your note left at User talk:208.81.184.4 has been made, and a response has been requested. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response has been provided. Atif.t2 (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laplace's Demon revert

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laplace%27s_demon&action=historysubmit&diff=318764616&oldid=318764582 I just put that there because I didn't know how to do one of those 'this needs evidence/a reference' tags. Why not just change it for me? It's kind of disheartening when you make a contribution and it gets taken away instantly...

Ok will do if the article needs it. Anyway keep on editing constructively Atif.t2 (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In future please follow this link [[2]] to provide tags to a page which needs citation. Atif.t2 (talk) 01:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cat meat

I removed some overstated cultural assertions from cat meat because they are incorrect and hyperbole based on ref. The edits are constructive. 59.167.45.107 (talk) 00:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks for the info Atif.t2 (talk) 00:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Montes de Oca (county)

Please can you delete it, I have a mistake when a translate it from spanish (comarca -> is shire, not county -> condado). Sorry for the mistake. Montes de Oca (shire) was the correct title. thanks in advance --Autrigón (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You can rename the page title by clicking here [[3]]. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot but I need to rename Montes de Oca (county) into Montes de Oca (shire) and in this way I lost all I have write in Montes de Oca (shire). Can you delete Montes de Oca (county)

Thanks --Autrigón (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only admins can delete a page. You will have to request them for it. [[4]]

By the way by renaming the page, only the title will change. The article will remain the same.

Atif.t2 (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BEC

Hi, I didn't know what you mean, until I looked. Not a problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.164.136.93 (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How is this unconstructive?

Has wikipedia gone the way of the Nazis? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.93.190.31 (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Just want to know if you had some ref or valid reason to change it. Nothing was also provided in your edit summary about the edit. Atif.t2 (talk) 20:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK that works.

OK that works. I just thought fucker sounded better.

Glad it worked out. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Programmer13

I am Programmer13, shoot! also, I believe now my I.P address changes! I have a new I.P every month or so! also, my first warning, I never wrote "test". (Programmer13 and Programmer103) 74.233.101.35 (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Maybe your IP address is of a proxy server. In that case the editing may have been done by another user but the warning will be given to the ip address talk page. Please login with your id so that this issue does not come again. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Problem, I forgot my beloved password. (74.233.101.35) Programmer103 (talk) 22:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(sorry for the confusion) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Programmer103 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure was all mine. Atif.t2 (talk) 21:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

criteria are very scientifical

I was changing a very important sentence with a complete other meaning

criteria are very scientifical must be criteria are NOT very scientifical —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hdboeck (talk • contribs) 22:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response has been provided at your talk page. Atif.t2 (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dice

Please don't revert my correct edits. Dice is the plural form of the word die.

@@ Line 170: / Line 170: @@
 : Response has been provided at your talk page. [[User:Atif.t2|Atif.t2]] ([[User talk:Atif.t2#top|talk]]) 23:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
+== Dice ==
+Please don't revert my correct edits. Dice is the plural form of the word die.