Jump to content

Nedap: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
removed less relevant external links
Taintain (talk | contribs)
496 edits
added voting computers removed by 212.182.171.45, it's not from some other page. removed dead wikilinks, added german verdict
Line 3: Line 3:
The company focuses on developing and supplying solutions in the fields of security (identification of persons, animals and goods) and electronic control units through [[NFC]].
The company focuses on developing and supplying solutions in the fields of security (identification of persons, animals and goods) and electronic control units through [[NFC]].


NEDAP's activities are organized in the following Market Groups: Agri, AVI (Automatic Vehicle Identification), Education, Election Systems, Healthcare, Libraries, Locker Management Systems, Power Supplies, Retail Support, Security Management, Specials and Voting Computers.
NEDAP's activities are organized in the following Market Groups: Agri, AVI (Automatic Vehicle Identification), Education, Election Systems, Healthcare, Libraries, Locker Management Systems, Power Supplies, Retail Support, Security Management, Specials and [[Electronic voting|Voting Computers]].

== Voting Computers ==

A small business unit of Nedap is their Election Systems group. There has been a lot of discussion about the trustworthiness of these computers. Some interesting newsbits about them follows.

=== Netherlands ===
In the [[Netherlands]] more than 90% of the population voted using ES3B machines from Nedap.
On 5 October 2006 the group "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" ("We do not trust voting machines") demonstrated on Dutch television how the ES3B machines could be manipulated in five minutes. The exchange of the software would not be recognizable by voters or election officials. <ref>[http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/images/9/91/Es3b-en.pdf Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis]</ref>
<ref>[http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/79106 Dutch citizens group cracks Nedap's voting computer]</ref>
{{Further|[[Dutch general election, 2006#Voting_machine_controversy|Dutch general election, 2006: Voting machine controversy]], and [[Electronic voting#Netherlands|Electronic voting: Netherlands]]}}
In 27. September 2007 all Dutch voting computers where decertified.<ref>[http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_bev_harr_070930_dutch_voting_compute.htm Dutch voting computers will be decertified shortly, opednews.com, 30. September 2007]</ref><ref>[http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/English Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet: Dutch voting computers will be decertified shortly]</ref><ref>[http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/96716 (German) Heise.de: Niederlande: Aus für Nedap-Wahlcomputer, 28. September 2007]</ref>

Using the Dutch Freedom of Information Act the "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" foundation received correspondence between of the Dutch Electoral Council and Nedap in February 2007. These include the proposal by Nedap to be bought by the Dutch government, otherwise the company would stop to support the next elections.<ref>[http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/English/Groenendaal Voting systems company threatens Dutch state: "Buy my company now or you won’t have provincial elections"]</ref>

====Corrupt election official====
In [[2006]] there was a case of an election official misinforming voters of when their vote was recorded and later recording it himself during municipality elections in the city of Zeeland, [[Landerd]]. A candidate who was also an election official and suspiciously got 181 votes in the polling place where he was working. In the other three polling places he got 11 votes combined.<ref>[http://www.wahlsysteme.de/Wahlnachrichten/2006_Menschenwerk%20und%20kein%20Maschinenwerk.pdf Statement of voting machine manufacturer Nedap]{{de icon}}</ref> In a poll by a local newspaper the results were totally different. The case is still under investigation.<ref>[http://www.brabantsdagblad.nl/brabant/article247185.ece Raadslid Landerd is stuk minder populair in schaduwverkiezing]{{nl icon}}</ref>

=== Germany ===
[[Germany]] used 2000 Nedap machines (ESD1 and ESD2) in the 2005 elections for the [[Bundestag]]. The difference between the machines used in the Netherlands and Germany is mainly due to differences in the voting laws.

In 2009, the [[Federal Constitutional Court of Germany]] found that when using voting machines the "verification of the result must be possible by the citizen reliably and without any specialist knowledge of the subject." The [[DRE voting machine|DRE]] Nedap-computers used till then did not fulfill that requirement. The decision did not ban electronic voting as such, but requires all essential steps in elections to be subject to public examinability.<ref>[http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20090303_2bvc000307en.html Ruling of the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 3 March 2009]</ref><ref>[http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg09-019en.html German Federal Constitutional Court, Press release no. 19/2009 of 3 March 2009]</ref>

=== Ireland ===
[[Ireland]] purchased 7500 Nedap machines in 2003 but is not using them yet because of security concerns.<ref>[http://www.rte.ie/news/2004/0430/evoting.html Cullen rules out use of e-voting in June]</ref>

=== United States ===
In the US the direct-recording electronic voting machines are marketed in partnership with [[Liberty Election Systems]] as "LIBERTYVOTE".<ref>[http://www.libertyelectionsystems.com/AboutUs.htm Liberty Election Systems, About us]</ref> The state of New York is currently contemplating buying 28,000 Nedap direct-recording electronic voting machines.<ref>[http://www.wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet.nl/English/Groenendaal Groenendaal]</ref>


== Shareholders ==
== Shareholders ==

Revision as of 10:14, 24 October 2009

Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a Netherlands based company. Its principal place of business is Groenlo, the Netherlands. It has subsidiaries in Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Spain, and has been quoted on the Euronext exchange since 1949.

The company focuses on developing and supplying solutions in the fields of security (identification of persons, animals and goods) and electronic control units through NFC.

NEDAP's activities are organized in the following Market Groups: Agri, AVI (Automatic Vehicle Identification), Education, Election Systems, Healthcare, Libraries, Locker Management Systems, Power Supplies, Retail Support, Security Management, Specials and Voting Computers.

Voting Computers

A small business unit of Nedap is their Election Systems group. There has been a lot of discussion about the trustworthiness of these computers. Some interesting newsbits about them follows.

Netherlands

In the Netherlands more than 90% of the population voted using ES3B machines from Nedap. On 5 October 2006 the group "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" ("We do not trust voting machines") demonstrated on Dutch television how the ES3B machines could be manipulated in five minutes. The exchange of the software would not be recognizable by voters or election officials. [1] [2]

Further information: [[:Dutch general election, 2006: Voting machine controversy, and Electronic voting: Netherlands]]

In 27. September 2007 all Dutch voting computers where decertified.[3][4][5]

Using the Dutch Freedom of Information Act the "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" foundation received correspondence between of the Dutch Electoral Council and Nedap in February 2007. These include the proposal by Nedap to be bought by the Dutch government, otherwise the company would stop to support the next elections.[6]

Corrupt election official

In 2006 there was a case of an election official misinforming voters of when their vote was recorded and later recording it himself during municipality elections in the city of Zeeland, Landerd. A candidate who was also an election official and suspiciously got 181 votes in the polling place where he was working. In the other three polling places he got 11 votes combined.[7] In a poll by a local newspaper the results were totally different. The case is still under investigation.[8]

Germany

Germany used 2000 Nedap machines (ESD1 and ESD2) in the 2005 elections for the Bundestag. The difference between the machines used in the Netherlands and Germany is mainly due to differences in the voting laws.

In 2009, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany found that when using voting machines the "verification of the result must be possible by the citizen reliably and without any specialist knowledge of the subject." The DRE Nedap-computers used till then did not fulfill that requirement. The decision did not ban electronic voting as such, but requires all essential steps in elections to be subject to public examinability.[9][10]

Ireland

Ireland purchased 7500 Nedap machines in 2003 but is not using them yet because of security concerns.[11]

United States

In the US the direct-recording electronic voting machines are marketed in partnership with Liberty Election Systems as "LIBERTYVOTE".[12] The state of New York is currently contemplating buying 28,000 Nedap direct-recording electronic voting machines.[13]

Shareholders

On 18 September 2007 the following list of major shareholders was comprised:[14]

  • Cross Options Beheer: 15.1%
  • Delta Deelnemingen Fund: 13.4%
  • Kempen Capital Management: 10.3%
  • Aviva: 8.1%
  • Fortis: 7.9%
  • Darlin: 5.3%
  • Eureko: 5.1%

References

  1. ^ Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis
  2. ^ Dutch citizens group cracks Nedap's voting computer
  3. ^ Dutch voting computers will be decertified shortly, opednews.com, 30. September 2007
  4. ^ Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet: Dutch voting computers will be decertified shortly
  5. ^ (German) Heise.de: Niederlande: Aus für Nedap-Wahlcomputer, 28. September 2007
  6. ^ Voting systems company threatens Dutch state: "Buy my company now or you won’t have provincial elections"
  7. ^ Statement of voting machine manufacturer NedapTemplate:De icon
  8. ^ Raadslid Landerd is stuk minder populair in schaduwverkiezingTemplate:Nl icon
  9. ^ Ruling of the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 3 March 2009
  10. ^ German Federal Constitutional Court, Press release no. 19/2009 of 3 March 2009
  11. ^ Cullen rules out use of e-voting in June
  12. ^ Liberty Election Systems, About us
  13. ^ Groenendaal
  14. ^ NYSE Euronext Template:Nl icon
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nedap&oldid=321732623"