Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runecats Explorer: Difference between revisions
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:John2232|John2232]] ([[User talk:John2232|talk]]) 16:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) |
[[User:John2232|John2232]] ([[User talk:John2232|talk]]) 16:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
Runecats Explorer is notable, it's the first browser to try and reduce the amount of electricity used to save the environment, it was one of the first browser to have full GUI skinning, it is one of the most search aided browsers, It does deserve an article, I and many other edit this article, give information on the newest released, some people give information of the history and much more. |
|||
This browser isn't a new browser it has been going for years, it has been going before Flock, Chrome etc... |
|||
Well I have got to go so that will have to be it for now. |
|||
[[User:Softwareleaksrme|Softwareleaksrme]] ([[User talk:Softwareleaksrme|talk]]) 16:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:21, 26 October 2009
- Runecats Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability at all. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS per this and this. SkyBonTalk/Contributions 11:13, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
This web browser article has been running for well over a year now, it has references and it appears to be a popular article to contribute. I found out about Runecats Explorer from wikipedia and I am glad I did as I use it as one of my main web browsers now.
I feel this article in relevant and should remain on wikipedia. Wikedit-34 (talk) 15:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Whether or not you find the browser useful or not, if it is not notable, it doesn't need an article... Captain n00dle T/C 16:01, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Wikedit this browser is notable, it was the default browser at my work place, a lot of my friends and family use it, I don't personly use the browser and just because you don't doesn't necessarily make it not notable.
This browser is certainly more notable than a lot of the browsers on wikipedia, lets take a slightly more well known browser such as "AOL Explorer"- this is still on wikipedia, it has the same amount if not less references, i wouldn't really classify that as notable.
There are loads of trident and gecko based browsers on the list of web browsers section which are less notable than RE.
John2232 (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Runecats Explorer is notable, it's the first browser to try and reduce the amount of electricity used to save the environment, it was one of the first browser to have full GUI skinning, it is one of the most search aided browsers, It does deserve an article, I and many other edit this article, give information on the newest released, some people give information of the history and much more.
This browser isn't a new browser it has been going for years, it has been going before Flock, Chrome etc...
Well I have got to go so that will have to be it for now. Softwareleaksrme (talk) 16:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)