Jump to content

Talk:SoundFont: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 1: Line 1:
== Added example song ==
== Added example song ==
I composed a song, originally in MIDI, and noticed it became quite awesome when played with soundfonts freely disponible in the public domain. So, I did my part of democracy and shared it! [[Special:Contributions/24.202.112.101|24.202.112.101]] ([[User talk:24.202.112.101|talk]]) 01:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
I composed a song, originally in MIDI, and noticed it became quite awesome when played with soundfonts freely disponible in the public domain. So, I did my part of democracy and shared it! [[Special:Contributions/24.202.112.101|24.202.112.101]] ([[User talk:24.202.112.101|talk]]) 01:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

If you're talking about that sidebar clip labelled Side By Side by Pascal Provost, all I can say is not everyone is going to share your positive opinion. In any event, I'm not sure it's a compelling example of how soundfonts are distinctly better, since it still resembles electronic music rather than anything acoustically recorded.


== bi-directional compatible? ==
== bi-directional compatible? ==

Revision as of 22:01, 28 October 2009

Added example song

I composed a song, originally in MIDI, and noticed it became quite awesome when played with soundfonts freely disponible in the public domain. So, I did my part of democracy and shared it! 24.202.112.101 (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about that sidebar clip labelled Side By Side by Pascal Provost, all I can say is not everyone is going to share your positive opinion. In any event, I'm not sure it's a compelling example of how soundfonts are distinctly better, since it still resembles electronic music rather than anything acoustically recorded.

bi-directional compatible?

Shouldn't that be worded as either bi-directionally compatible or more correctly as cross-compatible (compare backwards-compatible and foreward-compatible)--Jack Schitt 07:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Yep, should be bidirectionally compatible. Mikeguz 06:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Filename extension for SoundFont? --Abdull 12:40, 2 October 2005 (UTC) .sf2 is the Filename extension for SoundFonts[reply]

how to use soundfont with sonar?

I'm a newby using sf2/midi files. I use to work with Guitar Pro, then Reason to create samplers for the midi files, but I had no satisfying results with redrum while importing, 'cause the drum pieces - like hihats or bass - doesn't match. I'd like to use soundfounds for the drum tracks but I don't know how. Could someone give me a hint or something? I'd appreciate very much.

I hate to sound like a wet blanket but Wikipedia is not for technical support. This talk page should only be about this article and how to make it better. Why don't you try the Sonar forums? [1] --WayneMokane (talk) 04:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soundfont player?

Does anyone know of a simple soundfont player that can open up sf2 files and allow playback with a clickable keyboard interface?

- Yes, look at the free SoundFont/MIDI player SynthFont or the SoundFont editor Viena (not "Vienna") at www.synthfont.com.

trademark

i read on the FluidSynth web site that "SoundFont(R) is a registered trademark of E-mu Systems, Inc." This article does say it is a brand name, but perhaps the trademark holder should be mentioned? --Jerome Potts 03:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Memory limit/ Hardware synths

On SoniVox's web site, they mentioned that a library in Kontakt or Giga format was about 1.3 GB, but due to a memory limit, but due to a memory limit, the SoundFont library fit onto one CD. What's that about? The article did not mention anything about a memory limit. Also, I think it would be informative if the article mentioned something about the hardware synthesizers (Korg M3, etc) that use SoundFont. Dr G (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this would be a nice addition to the article. Why don't you go ahead and add it in? --WayneMokane (talk) 04:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SoundFont Extension

There is another SoundFont extension called ".sfArk". I don't know what it's for, but you can find examples at http://soundfonts.homemusician.net/ -David sfArk is a SoundFont compressed in size for quicker downloading. The afArk Application (free the last time I checked) compresses and decompresses the file for use. Funkus (talk) 21:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Error in "On Windows Vista" section

The Vista section states that the removal of an option to change the default midi out device makes it difficult or impossible to change to a soundfont compatible midi synth. This is not correct and is at best highly misleading. There is no GUI option for it in the sound control panel, however changing the midi out device is no harder than flipping a registry setting found in the two paths; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\ActiveMovie\devenum\{4EFE2452-168A-11D1-BC76-00C04FB9453B} and HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\ActiveMovie\devenum 64-bit\{4EFE2452-168A-11D1-BC76-00C04FB9453B}

In these two keys all midi devices are listed and changing the default is a simple matter of changing the MidiOutId of the "Default MidiOut Device" key to the id of whichever one of the listed devices you want to use. Their id is also sequentially enumerated with the Microsoft GS Wavetable Synth (the default shipped with Vista) as 0 and then all added midi devices being given the id of 1, 2, 3 and so on. In the case of having an X-fi Elite Pro from Creative installed in the system the devices "SB X-Fi Synth A [EC00]", SB X-Fi Synth B [EC00]" and "SB X-Fi MIDI Port [EC00]" are respectively given the ids 1, 2 and 3.

Thus, to use Synth A from the X-fi card one would only need to change the Default MidiOut Device key's MidiOutId to 1. To use the MIDI Port as the default playback device one would change the id to 3. To revert back to the original softsynth in Vista changing it back to 0 would do the trick.


tl;dr: Changing the default midi playback device might not be an easy task for someone not used to changing registry settings, but it is no more complicated than following the above steps or to, in closing, make a shorter how-to;
Maneuver to the keys
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\ActiveMovie\devenum\{4EFE2452-168A-11D1-BC76-00C04FB9453B}\Default MidiOut Device
and
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\ActiveMovie\devenum 64-bit\{4EFE2452-168A-11D1-BC76-00C04FB9453B}\Default MidiOut Device
and change the MidiOutId to 1 (or whichever id you want, the available ids can be found in the keys below the one you will be changing. A reboot is not necessary, though reopening the media player of your choice might be.

Recommend that the section be rewritten and to either include a short how-to similar to the one I wrote out or at the very least state that while there is no GUI option to change the midi out device, it can still be done by use of a single registry setting. (So there is no need for Creative or anyone else for that matter to make a utility to allow changing midi devices, though it might come in handy if you for whatever reason need to change it often).

85.166.47.120 (talk) 11:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


EDIT: Creative also has a soundfont bank manager for their x-fi and audigy cards, both included on the driver cd as well as a download from their driver download page on their website, making soundfont management on vista quite easy even without specialized audio software. 85.166.47.120 (talk) 12:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]