Talk:Subaltern Studies: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:45, 29 October 2009

India: History Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Is he deceased or not? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.131.56.31 (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It seems that subaltern studies has come under fire lately... would it be worth summarizing some of the critiques?

As founding members, it seems that their scholarship is at least as important as other historians with individual bio pages... 24.125.38.175 (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC) R.E.D.[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 It seems that subaltern studies has come under fire lately... would it be worth summarizing some of the critiques?
+== Bios for Arnold & Hardiman ==
+As founding members, it seems that their scholarship is at least as important as other historians with individual bio pages... [[Special:Contributions/24.125.38.175|24.125.38.175]] ([[User talk:24.125.38.175|talk]]) 16:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC) R.E.D.