Jump to content

Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AndrásG (talk | contribs)
→‎Contextual therapy: minor mods and additions
AndrásG (talk | contribs)
→‎Contextual therapy: additions ad minor mods
Line 7: Line 7:
The ''Contextual'' model emphasizes the [[ethics|ethical]] or "[[justice]]" dimension - the ''relational ethics'' - of close relationships: in particular, the roles of ''caring'', ''connectedness'', [[loyalty]], ''legacy'', [[guilt]], [[fairness]], [[accountability]], and [[trustworthiness]] - within and between [[generations]]. It sees ''relational ethics'' as not just a set of prescriptive [[Normative ethics|norms]], nor simply as [[psychology|psychological]] phenomena, [[Perspective (cognitive)|perspective]]s, or [[Constructivist epistemology|constructions]]. Rather it sees ''relational ethics'' as (i) having some objective [[Ontology|ontological]] and [[Experiential knowledge|experiential]] basis by virtue of being derived from [[wikt:basic|basic]] [[needs]] and from real [[Interpersonal relationship|relationship]]s with concrete consequences (i.e., as distinct from [[Abstraction|abstract]] or [[Value (personal and cultural)|"value" ethics]]); and (ii) as being significant [[explanation|explanatory]] and [[motivational]] dynamics operating - in both beneficial and destructive ways - in individuals, families, [[Group (sociology)|social groups]], and broader [[society]].
The ''Contextual'' model emphasizes the [[ethics|ethical]] or "[[justice]]" dimension - the ''relational ethics'' - of close relationships: in particular, the roles of ''caring'', ''connectedness'', [[loyalty]], ''legacy'', [[guilt]], [[fairness]], [[accountability]], and [[trustworthiness]] - within and between [[generations]]. It sees ''relational ethics'' as not just a set of prescriptive [[Normative ethics|norms]], nor simply as [[psychology|psychological]] phenomena, [[Perspective (cognitive)|perspective]]s, or [[Constructivist epistemology|constructions]]. Rather it sees ''relational ethics'' as (i) having some objective [[Ontology|ontological]] and [[Experiential knowledge|experiential]] basis by virtue of being derived from [[wikt:basic|basic]] [[needs]] and from real [[Interpersonal relationship|relationship]]s with concrete consequences (i.e., as distinct from [[Abstraction|abstract]] or [[Value (personal and cultural)|"value" ethics]]); and (ii) as being significant [[explanation|explanatory]] and [[motivational]] dynamics operating - in both beneficial and destructive ways - in individuals, families, [[Group (sociology)|social groups]], and broader [[society]].


''Multidirected partiality'' is the main methodological principle of contextual therapy. Its aim is to evoke a dialogue of mutual position-taking among family members. It consists of a sequential, empathic turning towards member after member (even absent members), in which both acknowledgement and expectation are directed at them. It is an alternative to the more common 'neutrality' or unilateral partiality of other approaches. It requires an appreciation of the 'ledger' from each person's point of view, even that of the current [[wikt:victimize|victimizer]].<ref>Le Goff, J.F. (2001). Boszormenyi-Nagy and Contextual Therapy: An Overview, [http://www.anzjft.com/pages/contents_abstracts.php?id=46 ''ANZJFT'', 22 (3)]: 147–157.</ref><ref>Wolman, B. & Stricker,G. (1983) Handbook of Family and Marital Thearpy. New York: Plenum.</ref>. For example, a family comes into therapy desiring to fix their son's outbursts and [[oppositional defiant disorder|oppositional defiant]] behavior. The therapist would firstly have each family member explain their side of the story, in order to begin to understand the problem in terms of background facts, the relational context (i.e., ''intergenerational'', ''interpersonal'', and [[systems theory|systemic]]), and deeper [[motivational]] processes (e.g., psychological processes, hidden ''loyalties'' and ''legacies'', ''ledger'' imbalances, ''destructive entitlement'' resulting from real or perceived injustices, ''parentification'' of the child, etc), and not simply (as is commonly done in some other approaches) in terms of the '[[behaviour modification|behaviour]]', 'interactions', or 'beliefs' of the family and the son. The therapist would then go further, sequentially 'taking sides' with each member (while maintaining an overall balance), the aim being to find resources for rebuilding relationships through mutual acknowledgement of both dues and obligations, shifts in attitude, and redemptive or ''rejunctive'' (i.e., 'trust-building') actions, which will in turn build ''trustworthiness'', which contextual therapists see as the ultimate relational resource for individual and family well-being.
''Multidirected partiality'' is the main methodological principle of contextual therapy. Its aim is to evoke a dialogue of mutual position-taking among family members. It consists of a sequential, empathic turning towards member after member (even absent members), in which both acknowledgement and expectation are directed at them. It is an alternative to the more common 'neutrality' or unilateral partiality of other approaches. It requires an appreciation of the 'ledger' from each person's point of view, even that of the current [[wikt:victimize|victimizer]].<ref>Le Goff, J.F. (2001). Boszormenyi-Nagy and Contextual Therapy: An Overview, [http://www.anzjft.com/pages/contents_abstracts.php?id=46 ''ANZJFT'', 22 (3)]: 147–157.</ref><ref>Wolman, B. & Stricker,G. (1983) Handbook of Family and Marital Thearpy. New York: Plenum.</ref>. For example, a family comes into therapy desiring to fix their son's outbursts and [[oppositional defiant disorder|oppositional defiant]] behavior. The therapist would firstly have each family member explain their side of the story, in order to begin to understand the problem in terms of background facts, the relational context (i.e., ''intergenerational'', ''interpersonal'', and [[systems theory|systemic]]), and deeper [[motivational]] factors (e.g., psychological processes, hidden ''loyalties'' and ''legacies'', ''ledger'' imbalances, ''destructive entitlement'' resulting from real or perceived injustices, ''parentification'' of the child, etc), and not simply (as is commonly done in some other approaches) in terms of the '[[behaviour modification|behaviour]]', 'systemic interactions', or 'beliefs' of the family and the son. The therapist would then go further, sequentially 'taking sides' with each member (while seeking to maintain overall balance), the aim being to reduce the reliance on [[dysfunctional family|dysfunctional]] [[Acting out|acting-out]] and to find resources for rebuilding relationships through mutual acknowledgement of both entitlements and obligations, shifts in attitude, and redemptive or ''rejunctive'' (i.e., 'trust-building') actions, which will in turn build individual and relational integrity and ''trustworthiness'', which contextual therapists see as the ultimate relational resource for individual and family well-being.


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 10:40, 30 October 2009

Ivan Böszörményi-Nagy (May 19, 1920, Budapest, HungaryJanuary 28, 2007, Glenside, Pennsylvania) was a Hungarian-American psychiatrist and one of the founders of the field of family therapy. He emigrated from Hungary to the United States in 1950.

Contextual therapy

Böszörményi-Nagy developed the Contextual approach to family therapy and individual psychotherapy. It is a comprehensive model which integrates individual psychological, interpersonal, existential, systemic, and intergenerational dimensions of individual and family life and development.

The Contextual model emphasizes the ethical or "justice" dimension - the relational ethics - of close relationships: in particular, the roles of caring, connectedness, loyalty, legacy, guilt, fairness, accountability, and trustworthiness - within and between generations. It sees relational ethics as not just a set of prescriptive norms, nor simply as psychological phenomena, perspectives, or constructions. Rather it sees relational ethics as (i) having some objective ontological and experiential basis by virtue of being derived from basic needs and from real relationships with concrete consequences (i.e., as distinct from abstract or "value" ethics); and (ii) as being significant explanatory and motivational dynamics operating - in both beneficial and destructive ways - in individuals, families, social groups, and broader society.

Multidirected partiality is the main methodological principle of contextual therapy. Its aim is to evoke a dialogue of mutual position-taking among family members. It consists of a sequential, empathic turning towards member after member (even absent members), in which both acknowledgement and expectation are directed at them. It is an alternative to the more common 'neutrality' or unilateral partiality of other approaches. It requires an appreciation of the 'ledger' from each person's point of view, even that of the current victimizer.[1][2]. For example, a family comes into therapy desiring to fix their son's outbursts and oppositional defiant behavior. The therapist would firstly have each family member explain their side of the story, in order to begin to understand the problem in terms of background facts, the relational context (i.e., intergenerational, interpersonal, and systemic), and deeper motivational factors (e.g., psychological processes, hidden loyalties and legacies, ledger imbalances, destructive entitlement resulting from real or perceived injustices, parentification of the child, etc), and not simply (as is commonly done in some other approaches) in terms of the 'behaviour', 'systemic interactions', or 'beliefs' of the family and the son. The therapist would then go further, sequentially 'taking sides' with each member (while seeking to maintain overall balance), the aim being to reduce the reliance on dysfunctional acting-out and to find resources for rebuilding relationships through mutual acknowledgement of both entitlements and obligations, shifts in attitude, and redemptive or rejunctive (i.e., 'trust-building') actions, which will in turn build individual and relational integrity and trustworthiness, which contextual therapists see as the ultimate relational resource for individual and family well-being.

Bibliography

Further reading

See also

References

  1. ^ Le Goff, J.F. (2001). Boszormenyi-Nagy and Contextual Therapy: An Overview, ANZJFT, 22 (3): 147–157.
  2. ^ Wolman, B. & Stricker,G. (1983) Handbook of Family and Marital Thearpy. New York: Plenum.