User talk:RayAYang: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 03:54, 15 November 2009

This is RayAYang's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 7 days

AN/I discussion - Ezra Friedlander

Hello, RayAYang. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Ezra Friedlander. Thank you. (This is related to the BLP/N thread on the same subject you helped me on a couple of days ago.) MirrorLockup (talk) 20:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the notice, situation seems to be in hand. Ray^Talk 20:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chamberlain review

Yes, I plead guilty, I nommed it because there were lengthy delays at GAN/World History and I was not expecting a review this soon. However, I should have the remaining sections done within a week. I did not write the unsourced sections, and will probably completely rewrite them. This is an important article, it needs to be kept complete for the reader, so I am doing one section at a time. Like I said, it should be done within a week, and I'll drop a note here. Thanks for the review and glad you liked it!--Wehwalt (talk) 20:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is ready to go. Need to polish it up in spots, but I'm confident you'll pass it.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Congrats! Ray^Talk 05:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

68.215.42.44

Thanks for your note. If the editor is deleting the categories on account of the guideline then that'd be fine. I just wasn't sure why he was doing it. Will Beback talk 06:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I don't know why he's doing it. I just noticed on reviewing that they seem to fall into categories that could be removed per that guideline. Ray^Talk 06:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Charles Krauthammmer

Actually, there was a reference that got deleted in a bunch of POV wrangling back and forth over that section. I've restored it - mind taking a look and telling me if you think there needs to be more? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:53, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thanks. I'm a little surprised, though - the WaPo article seems to say it's no big deal, which is actually a good argument for deleting that particular bit. But I won't get involved in that particular content conflict - only I should note that the WaPo article says nothing about FAIR's role, so we probably need another source for that. Ray^Talk 20:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there was originally a great deal more, which I deleted some months back on the grounds that it bordered on politicized rant. At the same time, I recognize that there has been some criticism of the man, and I think that warrants noting in the article. This struck me as the best happy medium we could achieve at the time. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James J Cooke Citations?

Please give me some examples of citations?

 His books are refernced in other Wikipedia articles as references?

 His membership in the Royal historical society is listed on the website?

will these not work?

 HELP????