Jump to content

Talk:List of synth-pop artists: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Archivey (talk | contribs)
→‎Lady GaGa: new section
Line 35: Line 35:


A basic requirement of inclusion on this list is that the artiste's article must state (in the Infobox or prose) that their Genre is (or was) [[Synthpop]]. It can list other genres too as artistes tend to cross over. It matters not if you personally consider an artist Synthpop, as that is just [[WP:OR]]. [[Electropop]], [[Darkwave]] [[New wave music|New Wave]], [[New Romantic]], [[Pop music|Pop]] are not [[Synthpop]]. [[User:Archivey|Archivey]] ([[User talk:Archivey|talk]]) 18:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
A basic requirement of inclusion on this list is that the artiste's article must state (in the Infobox or prose) that their Genre is (or was) [[Synthpop]]. It can list other genres too as artistes tend to cross over. It matters not if you personally consider an artist Synthpop, as that is just [[WP:OR]]. [[Electropop]], [[Darkwave]] [[New wave music|New Wave]], [[New Romantic]], [[Pop music|Pop]] are not [[Synthpop]]. [[User:Archivey|Archivey]] ([[User talk:Archivey|talk]]) 18:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

== Lady GaGa ==

Until Lady GaGa's article says she is a Synthpop artist it is not going to be accepted on this list.
Instead of edit warring to try and change the inclusion criteria. Edit Lady GaGa and add Synthpop first, if the genre is accepted by the consensus there, then add it to this list and not before.[[Special:Contributions/86.139.136.245|86.139.136.245]] ([[User talk:86.139.136.245|talk]]) 15:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:13, 21 November 2009

WikiProject iconIndexes
WikiProject iconThis alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.

I added the b-52's. I think they would qualify as Synthpop, Just listen to Rock Lobster! - Josh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.179.47.199 (talk) 23:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wouldn't modern talking, red flag or peter schilling be included in the list? and there are certain "sythnpop" sounding songs from bands not known to be a purely sythnpop band. I can think of Kon Kan's "I beg your pardon" or the Cure's "just like heaven". Philip Oakey's "Together in electric dreams" sounds like another one but im not sure what his general style is.

Philip Oakey was the lead singer of The Human League, who are already mentioned in the article. He released "Together in Electric Dreams" without the rest of the band, with producer Giorgio Moroder. Yes, The Cure released a few songs that closely resemble synthpop (the most obvious of which is 1983's "The Walk"), but I wouldn't include them on a list of synthpop artists. As for others, feel free to add them to the list, as long as they have a page on Wikipedia. John5008 | talk to me 21:26, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Okay. cool, that's right about Moroder. thanks for reminding me. I added Peter Schilling. His "the different story" definitely has the most classic synthpop sound of all his music. And I made another addition; Like Depeche Mode, Erasure was still popular worldwide in the 90's.

Ordering

It seems to me that organizing the list by date is just causing all sorts of trouble, leading to duplication and such. I intend to change it unless I hear some objections. Feel free to add dates active to the bands. --Eyrian 03:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I object. At least we can see the evolution of synthpop from the eighties to the present time. I think of it like classical music. Bach and Chopin's both classical but one's baroque and the other's a romantic composer; you won't be able to tell how the music has evolved. Plus did you just revert it back to an original page or left out my minor change i.e Peter Schilling? Why dont we have both pages then? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moreshige (talkcontribs) .
Peter Schilling is most certainly still on the list. Look under "s". As for the ordering, I don't think that listing bands in strict order of formation is truly that stylistically relevant. It might show a few casual connections, but I think that kind of relationship is better expressed in the text of individual articles (such as Synthpop itself).--Eyrian 23:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Why?

Why is Apoptygma Berzerk still kept in this list, when it was agreed in the main article's talk page that this band generally cannot be considered synthpop?--Skraelinger 13:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce????

No, please. Beyoncé????

Hey, why not? If Silver freakin' Apples are on here. Hell, let's invite Engelbert Humperdinck over too and have us a REAL party!!

Suggested Additions

Add Machine in Motion (see some of their videos on youtube); also add BlueOctober UK (listen to some samples on amazon.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.75.181 (talk) 03:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria for Inclusion

A basic requirement of inclusion on this list is that the artiste's article must state (in the Infobox or prose) that their Genre is (or was) Synthpop. It can list other genres too as artistes tend to cross over. It matters not if you personally consider an artist Synthpop, as that is just WP:OR. Electropop, Darkwave New Wave, New Romantic, Pop are not Synthpop. Archivey (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lady GaGa

Until Lady GaGa's article says she is a Synthpop artist it is not going to be accepted on this list. Instead of edit warring to try and change the inclusion criteria. Edit Lady GaGa and add Synthpop first, if the genre is accepted by the consensus there, then add it to this list and not before.86.139.136.245 (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]