Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Goldentrout: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{subst:Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Template | image = Goldentroutwiki.jpg | format = landscape | caption = A golden trout, California's state...' |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
;Comments: |
;Comments: |
||
* |
* |
||
Nice pic but I'm not sure about it, not only being a juvenile but being held like that, reminds me more of an angling magazine shot than an encyclopedia illustration. That would be the killer issue at FPC, although you'd also probably find the higher resolution only serves to show up a slight lack of definition common to compact cameras, and find it marked down for being a bit soft. That it's a nice-looking fish, generally, isn't enough. [[user:MIckStephenson|<b>mikaul</b>]][[User_talk:MIckStephenson|<sup>talk</sup>]] 22:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
;Seconder: |
;Seconder: |
||
* |
* |
Latest revision as of 22:47, 30 November 2009
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/Goldentroutwiki.jpg/390px-Goldentroutwiki.jpg)
High resolution and great brightness.
- Articles this image appears in
- Golden trout, Golden Trout Wilderness, Mount Whitney Fish Hatchery
- Creator
- Rayfound
- Suggested by
- Secret Saturdays (talk) 01:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
Nice pic but I'm not sure about it, not only being a juvenile but being held like that, reminds me more of an angling magazine shot than an encyclopedia illustration. That would be the killer issue at FPC, although you'd also probably find the higher resolution only serves to show up a slight lack of definition common to compact cameras, and find it marked down for being a bit soft. That it's a nice-looking fish, generally, isn't enough. mikaultalk 22:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Seconder