Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proxy Networks: Difference between revisions
Nedenchase (talk | contribs) |
Nedenchase (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
My opinion: This article should stay. It seems that the vast majority of its competitors are on Wikipedia, among them Webex, GoToMeeting (which I use and endorse), DimDim (even better), etc. I've heard of this company and though the language could be improved, it's no worse than the other companies'. This article would be a work-in-process, as is the spirit of Wikipedia. |
My opinion: This article should stay. It seems that the vast majority of its competitors are on Wikipedia, among them Webex, GoToMeeting (which I use and endorse), DimDim (even better), etc. I've heard of this company and though the language could be improved, it's no worse than the other companies'. This article would be a work-in-process, as is the spirit of Wikipedia. |
||
*'''Keep''' - Nedenchase |
*'''Keep''' --[[User:Nedenchase|<b><font color=red>Nedenchase]] |
||
Revision as of 03:52, 9 December 2009
- Proxy Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · [1])
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion for non-notable company. Recreation of twice-speedied article by single-issue user. I have been unable to find significant third-party coverage of this company. The references given in the article are press releases or trivial mentions. Haakon (talk) 20:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: It appears to be a autopromo. --MisterWiki talk (SIGN/REVIEW) 20:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
My reply: The article is not an autopromo. I am trying to put up a page for this company. A similar company, LogMeIn has a page on Wikipedia, and they are of the exact same status. Many of their links are to their own webpage, as well. It is very unclear why this very reputable company is being denied an entry. There is no need or reason to just delete the page when I am trying very hard to satisfy the requirements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamalade515 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- This template must be substituted. Haakon (talk) 17:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
My opinion: This article should stay. It seems that the vast majority of its competitors are on Wikipedia, among them Webex, GoToMeeting (which I use and endorse), DimDim (even better), etc. I've heard of this company and though the language could be improved, it's no worse than the other companies'. This article would be a work-in-process, as is the spirit of Wikipedia.
- Keep --Nedenchase