Jump to content

User talk:CT Cooper: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 189.106.23.227 - ""
Line 68: Line 68:
::: Okay, good luck with future assessments. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 20:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
::: Okay, good luck with future assessments. [[User:Camaron|Camaron<span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> Christopher]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;">&nbsp;·</span> [[User talk:Camaron|talk]]</small> 20:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)



Hey Camaron....

== '''== Hey Camaron.... ==''' ==



there's a kind of vandalism in the led zeppelin topic....
there's a kind of vandalism in the led zeppelin topic....

Revision as of 23:22, 28 December 2009

User:Camaron/Floating buttons User:Camaron/Talk page templates

Thank you

Hi Camaron, Thank you for your help on getting the ball rolling on my project with the Amador Valley High School article. You were the one who received the article after it was placed on the assessment request list for some time. Thanks for giving some of the first feedback that the article has recieved and thank you for helping guide the article along the FAC process. Enjoy your holiday season. Deltawk (talk) 06:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are very welcome, it is not often that one gets an article to FA, particularly a school article, and it would not have happened without your determination. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you are accusing me of being a sockpuppet? You need to relax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.180.63.222 (talk) 15:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for my suspicion are on the talk page of the school article linked in this section header, where I have also responded to the comments you made there. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent review of School for Creative and Performing Arts and your helpful and specific comments. I have addressed all of your comments and suggestions and expanded the article a bit following WP:WPSCH/AG#S. I'd like someone to take another look to see if I got the B-Class stuff right, and to help me get a bead on what needs to be a added for a GA assessment.

As a new editor, the requirements are a bit vague. Beyond the stylistic and citation guidelines, the expectations around content breadth, depth, and specificity are hard for the newbie to get a grip on. I am sure there is a measure on learning as you go, but any suggestions you, or others, might have would be appreciated. Are there specific sections that are weak or missing? Is there a better flow or structure I could aim for? Etc.

My goal would be a GA status for this article, but I'm not sure what to do next.

Thanks again.

Vaughanchris (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will try and take another look at the page soon. It will be difficult for a new editor to get an article to the top quality ratings, and yes some of the guidelines are rather vague. I will do my best to guide you on the way. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Proposed 'Motion to Close' at Wikipedia:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator. Jusdafax(talk) 00:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am noting for the record here that I have participated. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! Jusdafax 07:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article you might be interested in

Since you're a member of WP:WPSCHOOLS, would you be able to work on Coosa High School and bring it up to at least C or B class? Thanks, ConCompS (Talk to me) 01:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to give it a clean-up later on, though it will be a bit of a learning curve for me as I had not previously heard of this school. Camaron · Christopher · talk 11:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the Barnstar award. It was a nice surprise. This is my first article and I've struggled with the learning curve, so I appreciate the encouragement. As well as your helpful comments and suggestions. I think it's getting there! Vaughanchris (talk) 16:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

School Barnstar

The Schools Barnstar
For your excellent work in improving Desert Ridge Middle School. --NerdyScienceDude :) (click here to talk to me) 19:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome NerdyScienceDude. Welcome to WikiProject Schools, and thank you for the barnstar and your contributions so far. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what do you think?

Cam,

I have been spending some time trying to assess articles .... I've been careful to leave a note to call it "provisional", so that people I'm not trying to push an agenda ... as some other editors have. I saw your post regarding the backlog of assessments, and while I am still editing, and not sure I can handle 2,000, I am wondering if you think I am ready to start handling assessments ... if I have doubts about an assessment, is there any method to get help other than putting it on the list to get assessed? Any thoughts, I would be appreciative. LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I could add you to the assessment team at WP:WPSCH/A, and if you have doubts about an assessment you can place it in the assessment summaries section where I and others will often look at it. Officially you start off as an apprentice assessor and you have to put all the assessments you do there until you are put under experienced. I am probably going to raise a discussion over this at WT:WPSCH since this system is widely ignored by editors and opening up assessments might make it easier to clear the backlog. You are probably experienced enough to go straight into the experienced list, as the assessments you give are generally right. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate the vote of confidence, but I think I should start off as an apprentice for the time being. LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:11, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, good luck with future assessments. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:44, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


== Hey Camaron.... ==

there's a kind of vandalism in the led zeppelin topic....

I try to put an information and somebody are deleting....

Led zeppelin Can't be considered a Heavy metal band, just because they have a more expansive sound than the heavy metal can supose, so I write this:

(in despite of they couldn't be consider as a Heavy Metal band)<ref>Plant has commented that it is unfair for people to typecast the band as heavy metal, since about a third of their music was acoustic.[43]

And it dissapeared despite it's true....

If you knew the led zeppelin sound, you will see its not Heavy metal.......

Please,

Keep my comment!!!!!

~~~~ricknupp~~~~ {{subst:UnsignedIP|1=189.106.23.227|2=22:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)}}