Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OBrasilo: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)
Creating new discussion for OBrasilo. using TW
 
Adding comment
Line 1: Line 1:

<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
{{SPIarchive notice|OBrasilo}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
{{SPIarchive notice|OBrasilo}}<br />{{SPIpriorcases}}
Line 28: Line 27:
;Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>
;Comments by accused parties &nbsp;&nbsp; <small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small>


I have no idea who [[User:OBrasilo]] is. The IP Address I am currently using is a dynamic IP Address. I am pretty sure that this will be verified via CheckUser. Also, the reason I called some users' edits "vandalism" is because they actually were. For example, a fwe users that edited [[Windows Odyssey]] and [[Windows Neptune]] were constantly reverting legitimate edits to a version where it was redirected to [[Development of Windows XP]]. Since those redirects were against consensus, that makes those edits vandalism.

;Comments by other users
;Comments by other users



Revision as of 06:18, 8 January 2010

OBrasilo

OBrasilo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)


Report date January 8 2010, 06:07 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets


Evidence submitted by -- Collectonian (talk · contribs)

Suspected sock/meat puppets being used by Obrasilo and/or Lin to edit war at Windows Odyssey and Windows Neptune.[1][2] Concerted efforts at both articles, including using same terminology and calling anyone's edits "vandalism", including removing added sources, undoing correction of content to replace with the same personal opinions, and removal of deletion and maintenance tags. See also current ANI discussion, during which Obrasilo admitted several of the IPs were "friends" from his closed forum, but denied he asked them to come to his aid (yet all are SPA accounts) -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

I have no idea who User:OBrasilo is. The IP Address I am currently using is a dynamic IP Address. I am pretty sure that this will be verified via CheckUser. Also, the reason I called some users' edits "vandalism" is because they actually were. For example, a fwe users that edited Windows Odyssey and Windows Neptune were constantly reverting legitimate edits to a version where it was redirected to Development of Windows XP. Since those redirects were against consensus, that makes those edits vandalism.

Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: D (3RR using socks )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions