Talk:Logical atomism: Difference between revisions
→Literally nonsensical.: sign |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Literally? What's figuratively nonsensical? I almost deleted the word, but then, I have seen the phrase 'literally nonsensical' many times. Perhaps it has a specialized meaning, or perhaps it's a rote, undigested cliche. But it seems distractingly superfluous and careless. [[User:Erudecorp|Erudecorp]] [[User_Talk:Erudecorp|?]] [[Special:Contributions/Erudecorp|*]] 19:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC) |
Literally? What's figuratively nonsensical? I almost deleted the word, but then, I have seen the phrase 'literally nonsensical' many times. Perhaps it has a specialized meaning, or perhaps it's a rote, undigested cliche. But it seems distractingly superfluous and careless. [[User:Erudecorp|Erudecorp]] [[User_Talk:Erudecorp|?]] [[Special:Contributions/Erudecorp|*]] 19:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
::For Wittgenstein, ethics was completely absurd because it was a topic that is strictely motivated by '''''[[human]]''''' emotions, emotions towards certain tradition the person has been learning since child, thus not by reason.--[[ |
::For Wittgenstein, ethics was completely absurd because it was a topic that is strictely motivated by '''''[[human]]''''' emotions, emotions towards certain tradition the person has been learning since child, thus not by reason.--'''''[[User:Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="green">Andersmusician</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="red">NO</font>]]''''' 08:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::and methaphysics, as it is read from the Ancient Greece books, authors didn't applied a correct use of the language on their asumptions of the universe and higher planes. (Although methaphysics can probably be assessed from mathematics and probability)--[[ |
:::and methaphysics, as it is read from the Ancient Greece books, authors didn't applied a correct use of the language on their asumptions of the universe and higher planes. (Although methaphysics can probably be assessed from mathematics and probability)--'''''[[User:Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="green">Andersmusician</font>]] [[Wikipedia:Editor review/Andersmusician|<font size="1" color="red">NO</font>]]''''' 08:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:32, 10 January 2010
Philosophy: Language / Analytic Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Expansion
I expanded some of the article using mainly the excellent German Wikipedia article on Logical Atomism. Obviously the article here still needs a great lot of more work. 84.203.181.35 (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, especially including the tidying up of the syntax in sentences such as this one:
"Russell believed a special kind of relationship to have to postulate that guarantees that a subject views of reality can have."
I can't even understand that well enough to revise it.
65.213.77.129 (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Ill delete it. It looks wierd. 86.41.109.62 (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Literally nonsensical.
Quote: "For Wittgenstein, metaphysics & ethics were literally nonsensical."
Literally? What's figuratively nonsensical? I almost deleted the word, but then, I have seen the phrase 'literally nonsensical' many times. Perhaps it has a specialized meaning, or perhaps it's a rote, undigested cliche. But it seems distractingly superfluous and careless. Erudecorp ? * 19:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- For Wittgenstein, ethics was completely absurd because it was a topic that is strictely motivated by human emotions, emotions towards certain tradition the person has been learning since child, thus not by reason.--Andersmusician NO 08:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- and methaphysics, as it is read from the Ancient Greece books, authors didn't applied a correct use of the language on their asumptions of the universe and higher planes. (Although methaphysics can probably be assessed from mathematics and probability)--Andersmusician NO 08:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- For Wittgenstein, ethics was completely absurd because it was a topic that is strictely motivated by human emotions, emotions towards certain tradition the person has been learning since child, thus not by reason.--Andersmusician NO 08:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class philosophy of language articles
- Mid-importance philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Start-Class Analytic philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Analytic philosophy articles
- Analytic philosophy task force articles