Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
M0RD00R (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Keep. --[[User:Apollo789|Apollo789]] ([[User talk:Apollo789|talk]]) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Keep. --[[User:Apollo789|Apollo789]] ([[User talk:Apollo789|talk]]) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' "Tova Mordechai" gbook search yields 8 hits [http://books.google.com/books?ei=NDlKS8b7CpHWyQTDnvmGDg&cd=1&q=%22Tova+Mordechai%22&btnG=Search+Books]. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth mentioning that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad_movement/Workshop#WP:COATRACK_articles_and_sections]. Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. [[User:M0RD00R|M0RD00R]] ([[User talk:M0RD00R|talk]]) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:45, 10 January 2010

Tonica Marlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO WP:NOTE Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Wikipedia article and is not particularly notable John Nagle (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book is not in top 1 million on Amazon. "Tonica Marlow" has 4 hits in Google News archives. Zero hits in Google Scholar. No notability other than book. --John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. --Apollo789 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment "Tova Mordechai" gbook search yields 8 hits [1]. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth mentioning that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings [2]. Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. M0RD00R (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]