User talk:AmandaNP: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2009/December; 2010/January; 2010/February; 2010/March; 2010/April; 2010/May; 2010/June; 2010/July; 2010/August; 2010/September; 2010/October; 2010/November; 2010/December; 2011/January; 2011/February; 2011/March; 2011/April; 2011/May; 2011/June; 2011/July; 2011/August; 2011/September; 2011/October; 2011/November; 2011/December; 2012/January; 2012/February; 2012/March; ISI; 2012/April; 2012/May; 2012/June; 2012/September; 2012/August; 2012/July; 2012/October; 2012/December; 2012/November; 2013/January; 2013/March; 2013/February; 2013/April; 2013/May; 2013/June; 2013/July; 2013/August; 2013/September; 2013/October; 2013/November; 2013/December; 2014/January; 2014/Early 2014; 2014/July; 2014/August; 2014/September; 2014/October; 2014/December; 2014/November; 2015/March-July; 2015/January; 2015/February; 2015/August-November; 2015/December; 2016/January-February; 2016/March-May; 2016/June; 2016/June-October; 2016/November-December; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020; 2021; 2022; 2023; 2024;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:13, 27 January 2010

User:MWOAP/header

This is AmandaNP's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Talkback

Hello, AmandaNP. You have new messages at Intelligentsium's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Intelligentsium 23:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion report

Awesome! I'm glad to see someone taking up the discussion report. Good luck! It can be a lot of work (depending on how broad of coverage you aspire to) but also very rewarding.--ragesoss (talk) 02:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar

Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century

News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more

In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?

WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning me for 3RR violations

MWOAP;

Please note that the three-revert rule explicitly exempts reverting blatant vandalism from the rule.

* Obvious vandalism – edits which any well-intentioned user would immediately agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding cruel or offensive language. Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt. Administrators should block persistent vandals and protect pages subject to vandalism from many users, rather than repeatedly reverting.

Look at the edits I reverted: [1] [2], [3], and[4]. They're not just vandalism- they're among the most obvious vandalism I've ever seen. Chester Arthur the first black President? Osama Bin Laden assassinated President Garfield? The "Big Pimping" party? They're blatant vandalism to anyone who sees them.

Please be more careful when using templated warnings in the future. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single|Single-page]] &middot; [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] &middot; [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 04:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)</div>
 <!-- EdwardsBot 0022 -->
+== Warning me for 3RR violations ==
+MWOAP;
+Please note that the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]] explicitly exempts reverting blatant vandalism from the rule.
+<blockquote>
+    * Obvious vandalism – edits which any well-intentioned user would immediately agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding cruel or offensive language. Legitimate content changes, adding or removing tags, edits against consensus, and similar actions are not exempt. Administrators should block persistent vandals and protect pages subject to vandalism from many users, rather than repeatedly reverting.
+</blockquote>
+Look at the edits I reverted: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chester_A._Arthur&action=historysubmit&diff=340340044&oldid=340340013] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chester_A._Arthur&action=historysubmit&diff=340339751&oldid=340339676], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chester_A._Arthur&action=historysubmit&diff=340339430&oldid=340339388], and[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chester_A._Arthur&action=historysubmit&diff=340338494&oldid=340338470].  They're not just vandalism- they're among the most obvious vandalism I've ever seen.  Chester Arthur the first black President?  Osama Bin Laden assassinated President Garfield? The "Big Pimping" party?  They're blatant vandalism to anyone who sees them.
+Please be more careful when using templated warnings in the future. [[User:Bradjamesbrown|Bradjamesbrown]] ([[User talk:Bradjamesbrown|talk]]) 15:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)