Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anahata Yoga: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tbsdy lives (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=This was listed on CSD to be deleted because it was blatant advertising, but I cannot see it myself. It appears I'm...' |
Georgiamonet (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Anahata Yoga}}) |
:({{findsources|Anahata Yoga}}) |
||
This was listed on CSD to be deleted because it was blatant advertising, but I cannot see it myself. It appears I'm not alone here, as a number of editors have expressed the same opinion on the talk page. However, general consensus on talk is that we cannot determine if this article is notable in the Yoga world, and it was suggested we take to AFD. I am therefore listing this here for further discussion. [[User:Tbsdy lives|Tbsdy]] (formerly [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]]) <sup>[[User talk:Tbsdy lives|talk]]</sup> 02:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
This was listed on CSD to be deleted because it was blatant advertising, but I cannot see it myself. It appears I'm not alone here, as a number of editors have expressed the same opinion on the talk page. However, general consensus on talk is that we cannot determine if this article is notable in the Yoga world, and it was suggested we take to AFD. I am therefore listing this here for further discussion. [[User:Tbsdy lives|Tbsdy]] (formerly [[User:Ta bu shi da yu|Ta bu shi da yu]]) <sup>[[User talk:Tbsdy lives|talk]]</sup> 02:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
The following of Anahata Yoga appears to be significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia page. In my opinion, it passes the notoriety test. [[User:Georgiamonet|Georgiamonet]] ([[User talk:Georgiamonet|talk]]) 02:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:50, 3 February 2010
- Anahata Yoga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was listed on CSD to be deleted because it was blatant advertising, but I cannot see it myself. It appears I'm not alone here, as a number of editors have expressed the same opinion on the talk page. However, general consensus on talk is that we cannot determine if this article is notable in the Yoga world, and it was suggested we take to AFD. I am therefore listing this here for further discussion. Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 02:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
The following of Anahata Yoga appears to be significant enough to warrant a Wikipedia page. In my opinion, it passes the notoriety test. Georgiamonet (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)