Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2+2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
keep (page has been restored to a previous, better, pre-vandalism version) |
Georgiamonet (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This page appears to serve no purpose other than as an outlet for vandalism. If someone is capable of reading wikipedia, are they likely to need to know the answer to an elementary school (if not kindergarten) maths problem? [[user:RoadieRich|Rich]]<sup>([[special:contributions/RoadieRich|Contribs]])</sup>/<sub>([[user_talk:RoadieRich|Talk to me!]])</sub> I can haz [[Wikipedia:Editor review/RoadieRich|review]] plz? 02:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
This page appears to serve no purpose other than as an outlet for vandalism. If someone is capable of reading wikipedia, are they likely to need to know the answer to an elementary school (if not kindergarten) maths problem? [[user:RoadieRich|Rich]]<sup>([[special:contributions/RoadieRich|Contribs]])</sup>/<sub>([[user_talk:RoadieRich|Talk to me!]])</sub> I can haz [[Wikipedia:Editor review/RoadieRich|review]] plz? 02:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
:'''Strong keep''' — actually this is a disambiguation page with three meaningful entries in addition to the maths, which itself (the maths) makes some kind of sense there as an intro to the disambig page. When the deletion nomination was made, two of the definitions and their links were absent because of several vandalistic edits which the nominator presumably hadn't seen. – [[User:kierant|<font color="#006600">Kieran T</font>]] <sup>''(''[[User talk:kierant|''<font color="#006600">talk</font>'']]'')''</sup> 02:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
:'''Strong keep''' — actually this is a disambiguation page with three meaningful entries in addition to the maths, which itself (the maths) makes some kind of sense there as an intro to the disambig page. When the deletion nomination was made, two of the definitions and their links were absent because of several vandalistic edits which the nominator presumably hadn't seen. – [[User:kierant|<font color="#006600">Kieran T</font>]] <sup>''(''[[User talk:kierant|''<font color="#006600">talk</font>'']]'')''</sup> 02:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
DELETE. If someone cannot add 2 + 2 then I doubt they can read a Wikipedia entry about it. This is a pointless waste of computer memory. [[User:Georgiamonet|Georgiamonet]] ([[User talk:Georgiamonet|talk]]) 02:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:52, 3 February 2010
- 2+2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page appears to serve no purpose other than as an outlet for vandalism. If someone is capable of reading wikipedia, are they likely to need to know the answer to an elementary school (if not kindergarten) maths problem? Rich(Contribs)/(Talk to me!) I can haz review plz? 02:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
- Strong keep — actually this is a disambiguation page with three meaningful entries in addition to the maths, which itself (the maths) makes some kind of sense there as an intro to the disambig page. When the deletion nomination was made, two of the definitions and their links were absent because of several vandalistic edits which the nominator presumably hadn't seen. – Kieran T (talk) 02:49, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
DELETE. If someone cannot add 2 + 2 then I doubt they can read a Wikipedia entry about it. This is a pointless waste of computer memory. Georgiamonet (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)