Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skypecasting: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:59, 7 January 2006

Skypecasting

Yes because combining two useless words together makes it even more useless. non-notable concept, etc Timecop 08:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - 187,000 hits on google, many articles explaining what it is, eg [1] --Oscarthecat 08:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - actual number of hits is 351 Night Gyr 08:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep , possible Merge with other podcasting articles (see possible merge of podnography et al). —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-05 09:06Z
Delete - possible delete or just delete - Femmina 09:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep many google hits including slashdot and new scientist -- Astrokey44|talk 10:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not very notable --Depakote 11:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care if it has google hits. It's a neologism. Delete, and if that won't work, redirect to Skype. Proto t c 13:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or more weakly, merge) per Proto. --Hosterweis 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Podcast if the information is required at all. -- (aeropagitica) UK 15:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nom. --Kilo-Lima 17:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. Worthless foocasting neologism. Incognito 18:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --kingboyk 18:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom TapirUser had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
Delete No. Jmax- 19:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes[reply]
Delete This should just be trashed. Eusebeus 20:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. For reasons stated above. Oh and hello to all the new editors. -- JJay 21:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- How could you possibly vote to Strong Keep this????? Eusebeus 05:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Check JJay's voting history: some people have less of a problem with trivia than others; JJay seems not to mind it as long as it's verifiable, which is his prerogative. I disagree, but that's mine. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 12:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    - I also dislike block voting and sockpuppets. -- JJay 22:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right with you on sockpuppets, do please let me know how to arrange a block vote :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 23:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for preference, but perhaps merge all foocasting to one single Cruft-O-Rama. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 22:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Skype. Tom Foolery 01:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Forallah 02:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page[reply]
Delete per other delete votes. Cptchipjew 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 *'''Merge''' with [[Skype]]. [[User:Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 01:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Forallah|Forallah]] 02:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)<small>User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page</small>
+* '''Delete''' per other delete votes. [[User:Cptchipjew|Cptchipjew]] 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)