User talk:Tide rolls

If you have reason to leave a comment, question or suggestion, please click here and start a new section.

Thanks for stopping by. Template:Archive box collapsible

If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you.

Comment

Do you have ANY problem with how much you use Huggle? Why every day? Take this as something to respond to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.243.248 (talk) 01:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't use huggle every day. Tiderolls 01:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

• TR, note I subscribe to WP:DENY & WP:DFTT. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 01:21, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

As do I, Dave. I've committed to respond here and since the request was polite I decided to respond. I think we are of the same mind that the possibility that this user is disingenuous is very high. If I get a real sense of being trolled WP:DENY is close at hand. If I've misinterpreted your intent please let me know. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Nope, not trolling. Just two feelings: curious and misunderstood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.243.248 (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Stetson Middle School

Would you mind restoring the PROD tag you removed? There is nothing inherently notable about middle schools. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 01:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Already done. Tiderolls 01:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. 76.102.12.35 (talk) 02:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism: Repeated Deletions of WCLX History By Abusive Contributor 'PeterTripp' and Now By Wikipedia

It's interesting that you backed out my "unsourced" changes when the entire existing article on WCLX is unsourced. Is this just because I haven't bothered to register an account? Your contributor "PeterTripp" is attempting to control the history of this station because he has an infantile dispute with the former operators of the station. If my registering with Wikipedia increases my credibility, I shall do so, but I don't condone the infantile actions of 'PeterTripp', and neither should you. If you only want sourced content in this article, then you should delete this entire article. I am resubmitting my edits, pending your direction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.163.254 (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The entire existing article is not unsourced. I have opinions regarding Petertripp's editing as well as the users that insist on using the article as a battleground. Please, make whatever edits you feel are necessary. I will not engage in an edit war to prove a point, but your edits will be subject to the scrutiny of all editors and will be subject to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Regards Tiderolls 19:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Here we go again. I'll take the opportunity now to point out that User:Petertripp was taken to the conflict of interest noticeboard, didn't respond to his relevant thread, and hasn't made a controversial edit since. The article as it stands is, for the most part, referenced by independent third-party sources. It is of a neutral tone for the first time in its history. I provided sources for the parts of the article I could find references for and deleted the rest; this was reverted by Petertripp, but Tide restored it after the aforementioned COI had settled down. Most recently it has been changed by another completely uninvolved editor who - and excuse me for my frank tone here - removed much of the POV and irrelevant detail that your edit brought. If you have any specific concerns about the article as it stands, and can back them up with references, then have at it; if your only concern with the article is that it doesn't pander to your point of view, then I think we're done here. This back-and-forth POV edit-warring has gone on long enough. SMC (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mister Rolls

I believe you have made a mistake on my Josh Peck edit. Those lines that I put into the interview were the raw, unedited feeling of the Mister Peck we all know and love. Sometimes you just have to infer. Not everything needs to be typed out. Respectfully yours, Cinnamon Rolls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.51.179 (talk) 23:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

wycleff jean

All I want to know is where was he born?

You can find that information in the article. Or, by following the links in any of the warnings on your user talk. Tiderolls 17:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Is this some kind of dumb meme we're seeing? DMacks (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Meh...probably kids. I've not seen it before, but you could fill volumes with stuff I've not seen. Tiderolls 17:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

wycleff Jean

All I was trying to do was help somebody —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.186.229 (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Little

There are videos which feature him saying those words, especially the Speed Rape Combo is widely used in them. 82.52.19.236 (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll strike the templated message I left on your user talk. Please do not use article talk pages as a forum; they are meant to be used to discuss article development. Regards Tiderolls 18:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Your recent revert cited unsourced content in the edit summary. I have therefore began to systematically remove all such content from the same article. You have shown me the light. Thank You.