User talk:Sparrowhawk64: Difference between revisions
UberCryxic (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CfD: American conservative organizations |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Hey, you and I seem to be in agreement over the Lib Dems article, but I think Haldraper has gone completely bonkers, putting in tags anywhere and everywhere he can now to sabotage the quality and the reputation of the article. He's also making some pretty silly accusations in the talk page. I'm not really sure what to do. I mean, I hate to just crudely revert back and forth. On the other hand, I also hate to get him blocked because I don't want to drive him away from the article; I want him to see the error of his ways. I'll work on convincing him, I guess, and hope that it pays dividends.[[User:UberCryxic|UberCryxic]] ([[User talk:UberCryxic|talk]]) 16:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
Hey, you and I seem to be in agreement over the Lib Dems article, but I think Haldraper has gone completely bonkers, putting in tags anywhere and everywhere he can now to sabotage the quality and the reputation of the article. He's also making some pretty silly accusations in the talk page. I'm not really sure what to do. I mean, I hate to just crudely revert back and forth. On the other hand, I also hate to get him blocked because I don't want to drive him away from the article; I want him to see the error of his ways. I'll work on convincing him, I guess, and hope that it pays dividends.[[User:UberCryxic|UberCryxic]] ([[User talk:UberCryxic|talk]]) 16:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
== CfD: American conservative organizations == |
|||
FYI: [[User:BrownHairedGirl]] has nominated this category for deletion also.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_13#Conservative_organisations][[User:TVC 15|TVC 15]] ([[User talk:TVC 15|talk]]) 23:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:54, 13 February 2010
Liberal Democrats
Yes, I'm with you. See the talk page. I've made a proposal similar to yours. Under my idea, we should just call them a 'social liberal political party' in the opening sentence, if we can't find a compromise solution over center and left. I hope you agree that this idea is sensible.UberCryxic (talk) 17:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
And don't worry this is not an edit war yet. I've seen a lot worse in Wikipedia.UberCryxic (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
I've presented 13 recent sources in the talk page that place the party in the center-left, social liberal camp. I think this latest effort should settle the issue.UberCryxic (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey, you and I seem to be in agreement over the Lib Dems article, but I think Haldraper has gone completely bonkers, putting in tags anywhere and everywhere he can now to sabotage the quality and the reputation of the article. He's also making some pretty silly accusations in the talk page. I'm not really sure what to do. I mean, I hate to just crudely revert back and forth. On the other hand, I also hate to get him blocked because I don't want to drive him away from the article; I want him to see the error of his ways. I'll work on convincing him, I guess, and hope that it pays dividends.UberCryxic (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
CfD: American conservative organizations
FYI: User:BrownHairedGirl has nominated this category for deletion also.[1]TVC 15 (talk) 23:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)