Talk:The Arab Mind: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:20, 14 February 2010

Books Unassessed

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

User:Kitrus's edits

Kitrus, can you explain why you are replacing properly sourced criticism with unsourced claims such as "The book is widely dismissed as being essentialist, reductionist, and unscientific"? This, of course, violates WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Boston Globe article verifies this repeatedly. Read it.--Kitrus 06:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read it, and it does not say that. In fact, it uses none of those words. Please quote the sentences in question that you think do say that. Jayjg ^(talk) 13:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too much criticism, too few other content

This article needs some information about actual content of the book, criticism is fine but article is primary is about "what the book is about" not "why the book is bad". So sections other than criticism should be gradually expanded so we should place stab article notice box in the article to encourage people to add more information.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :The [[Boston Globe]] article verifies this repeatedly. Read it.--[[User:Kitrus|Kitrus]] 06:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 ::I've read it, and it does not say that. In fact, it uses none of those words. Please quote the sentences in question that you think do say that. [[User:Jayjg|Jayjg ]]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">[[User_talk:Jayjg|(talk)]]</font></small></sup> 13:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
+== Too much criticism, too few other content ==
+This article needs some information about actual content of the book, criticism is fine but article is primary is about "what the book is about" not "why the book is bad". So sections other than criticism should be gradually expanded so we should place stab article notice box in the article to encourage people to add more information.