Revision as of 20:22, 19 February 2010

Albums Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I've added a whole bunch of information and an infobox, but don't have a link to a fair use cover scan or any external review links... Fosse8 16:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cover image and external review added. --BNutzer 17:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was impressively fast...! Fosse8 20:48, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

which floor have he fallen from?

did he fall from the third or fourth floor?

here [1] it is written 3rd floor

and here [2] it is written 4th floor.

which is true?

A UK third floor window is the same as a US fourth floor window, so maybe the 'Rock Bottom' entry was written by an American and the 'Robert Wyatt' entry written by a Briton? Halmyre (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Album Reviews

Why was the Pitchfork review deleted? Just because the rating is considerably lower than the others? It's a well-known publication, and it seems biased to only include favorable reviews. I'd like to add it again unless there is a good reason not to. Cromni (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I have a problem with the Pitchfork reviews of his albums, not necessarily because of the low ratings, but because they seem to want to review them as if they were "indie rock" albums, (or at least some sort of pop-rock subgenre) instead of the more jazz-related albums that they are. This is especially true of his post-1970s work. That being said, such a review shouldn't necessarily be deleted, but it's something to think about anyway. 74.130.253.223 (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:36, 17 January 2010 edit Cromni (talk \| contribs) 8 edits →‎Album Reviews ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:22, 19 February 2010 edit undo 74.130.253.223 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	Why was the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rock_Bottom_%28album%29&diff=329626267&oldid=329624025 Pitchfork review deleted]? Just because the rating is considerably lower than the others? It's a well-known publication, and it seems biased to only include favorable reviews. I'd like to add it again unless there is a good reason not to. [[User:Cromni\|Cromni]] ([[User talk:Cromni\|talk]]) 00:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)		Why was the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rock_Bottom_%28album%29&diff=329626267&oldid=329624025 Pitchfork review deleted]? Just because the rating is considerably lower than the others? It's a well-known publication, and it seems biased to only include favorable reviews. I'd like to add it again unless there is a good reason not to. [[User:Cromni\|Cromni]] ([[User talk:Cromni\|talk]]) 00:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

			:Personally, I have a problem with the Pitchfork reviews of his albums, not necessarily because of the low ratings, but because they seem to want to review them as if they were "indie rock" albums, (or at least some sort of pop-rock subgenre) instead of the more jazz-related albums that they are. This is especially true of his post-1970s work. That being said, such a review shouldn't necessarily be deleted, but it's something to think about anyway. [[Special:Contributions/74.130.253.223\|74.130.253.223]] ([[User talk:74.130.253.223\|talk]]) 20:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)