Jump to content

Cell site: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
m Putting range back to 40km
Line 29: Line 29:
In practice, cell sites are grouped in areas of high population density, with the most potential users. Cell phone traffic through a single cell mast is limited by the mast's capacity; there is a finite number of calls that a mast can handle at once. This limitation is another factor affecting the spacing of cell mast sites. In suburban areas, masts are commonly spaced 1-2 miles apart and in dense urban areas, masts may be as close as ¼-½ mile apart. Cell masts always reserve part of their available bandwidth for emergency calls.
In practice, cell sites are grouped in areas of high population density, with the most potential users. Cell phone traffic through a single cell mast is limited by the mast's capacity; there is a finite number of calls that a mast can handle at once. This limitation is another factor affecting the spacing of cell mast sites. In suburban areas, masts are commonly spaced 1-2 miles apart and in dense urban areas, masts may be as close as ¼-½ mile apart. Cell masts always reserve part of their available bandwidth for emergency calls.


[[File:Fresnel zone disruption (compact).PNG|thumb|300px|Objects intruding into the [[fresnel zone]] between radio transmitters and receivers can greatly impact signal strength.]]The ''maximum'' range of a mast (where it is not limited by interference with other masts nearby) depends on the same circumstances. Some technologies, such as GSM, have a fixed maximum range of 4km (2.3 miles), which is imposed by [[Timing advance|technical limitations]]. CDMA and iDEN have no built-in limit, but the limiting factor is really the ability of a low-powered personal cell phone to transmit back to the mast. As a rough guide, based on a tall mast and flat terrain, it is possible to get between 50 to 70 km (30-45 miles). When the terrain is hilly, the maximum distance can vary from as little as {{convert|5|km|mi}} to {{convert|8|km|mi}} due to encroachment of intermediate objects into the wide center [[fresnel zone]] of the signal.<ref>[http://www.arcx.com/sites/faq.htm Frequently Asked PCS Questions] undated, URL retrieved 14 August 2007.</ref> Depending on terrain and other circumstances, a GSM Tower can replace between 2 and 50 miles of cabling for fixed wireless networks.<ref>[http://www.accel-networks.com/blog/2009/03/ntia-seeks-input-on-broadband-stimulus.html NTIA Seeks Input on Broadband Stimulus Money] undated, URL retrieved 3 March 2009.</ref>
[[File:Fresnel zone disruption (compact).PNG|thumb|300px|Objects intruding into the [[fresnel zone]] between radio transmitters and receivers can greatly impact signal strength.]]The ''maximum'' range of a mast (where it is not limited by interference with other masts nearby) depends on the same circumstances. Some technologies, such as GSM, have a fixed maximum range of 40km (23 miles), which is imposed by [[Timing advance|technical limitations]]. CDMA and iDEN have no built-in limit, but the limiting factor is really the ability of a low-powered personal cell phone to transmit back to the mast. As a rough guide, based on a tall mast and flat terrain, it is possible to get between 50 to 70 km (30-45 miles). When the terrain is hilly, the maximum distance can vary from as little as {{convert|5|km|mi}} to {{convert|8|km|mi}} due to encroachment of intermediate objects into the wide center [[fresnel zone]] of the signal.<ref>[http://www.arcx.com/sites/faq.htm Frequently Asked PCS Questions] undated, URL retrieved 14 August 2007.</ref> Depending on terrain and other circumstances, a GSM Tower can replace between 2 and 50 miles of cabling for fixed wireless networks.<ref>[http://www.accel-networks.com/blog/2009/03/ntia-seeks-input-on-broadband-stimulus.html NTIA Seeks Input on Broadband Stimulus Money] undated, URL retrieved 3 March 2009.</ref>


=== Channel reuse ===
=== Channel reuse ===

Revision as of 15:01, 14 March 2010

Cell tower in Morrisville, North Carolina
An antenna array on top of an electricity pylon
A "camouflaged" monopole, called a monopalm, located in Tucson, Arizona
Cell site tower in the Philippines
A short-mast cell site on top of a mountain in Wyoming, USA.

A cell site is a term used primarily in North America for a site where antennas and electronic communications equipment are placed on a radio mast or tower to create a cell in a cellular network. A cell site is composed of a tower or other elevated structure for mounting antennas, and one or more sets of transmitter/receivers transceivers, digital signal processors, control electronics, a GPS receiver for timing (for CDMA2000 or IS-95 systems), regular and backup electrical power sources, and sheltering.[1]

A synonym for "cell site" is "cell tower", although many cell site antennas are mounted on buildings rather than as towers. In GSM networks, the technically correct term is Base Transceiver Station (BTS), and colloquial British English synonyms are "mobile phone mast" or "base station". The term "base station site" might better reflect the increasing co-location of multiple mobile operators, and therefore multiple base stations, at a single site. Depending on an operator's technology, even a site hosting just a single mobile operator may house multiple base stations, each to serve a different air interface technology (CDMA or GSM, for example). Preserved treescapes can often hide cell towers inside an artificial tree or preserved tree. These installations are generally referred to as concealed cell sites or stealth cell sites.

Operation

Range

The working range of a cell site - the range within which mobile devices can connect to it reliably is not a fixed figure. It will depend on a number of factors, including

  • The frequency of signal in use (i.e. the underlying technology).
  • The transmitter's rated power.
  • The transmitter's size.
  • The array setup of panels may cause the transmitter to be directional or omni-directional.
  • It may also be limited by local geographical or regulatory factors and weather conditions.

Generally, in areas where there are enough cell sites to cover a wide area, the range of each one will be set to:

  • Ensure there is enough overlap for "handover" to/from other sites (moving the signal for a mobile device from one cell site to another, for those technologies that can handle it - e.g. making a GSM phone call while in a car or train).
  • Ensure that the overlap area is not too large, to minimize interference problems with other sites.

In practice, cell sites are grouped in areas of high population density, with the most potential users. Cell phone traffic through a single cell mast is limited by the mast's capacity; there is a finite number of calls that a mast can handle at once. This limitation is another factor affecting the spacing of cell mast sites. In suburban areas, masts are commonly spaced 1-2 miles apart and in dense urban areas, masts may be as close as ¼-½ mile apart. Cell masts always reserve part of their available bandwidth for emergency calls.

Objects intruding into the fresnel zone between radio transmitters and receivers can greatly impact signal strength.

The maximum range of a mast (where it is not limited by interference with other masts nearby) depends on the same circumstances. Some technologies, such as GSM, have a fixed maximum range of 40km (23 miles), which is imposed by technical limitations. CDMA and iDEN have no built-in limit, but the limiting factor is really the ability of a low-powered personal cell phone to transmit back to the mast. As a rough guide, based on a tall mast and flat terrain, it is possible to get between 50 to 70 km (30-45 miles). When the terrain is hilly, the maximum distance can vary from as little as 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) to 8 kilometres (5.0 mi) due to encroachment of intermediate objects into the wide center fresnel zone of the signal.[2] Depending on terrain and other circumstances, a GSM Tower can replace between 2 and 50 miles of cabling for fixed wireless networks.[3]

Channel reuse

The concept of "maximum" range is misleading, however, in a cellular network. Cellular networks are designed to create a mass communication solution from a limited amount of channels (slices of radio frequency spectrum necessary to make one conversation) that are licensed to an operator of a cellular service. To overcome this limitation, it is necessary to repeat and reuse the same channels at different locations. Just as a car radio changes from one local station to a completely different local station with the same frequency when you travel to another city, the same radio channel gets reused on a cell mast only a few miles away. To do this, the signal of a cell mast is intentionally kept at low power and many cases tilting downward to limit its area. The area sometimes needs to be limited when a large number of people live, drive or work near a particular mast; the range of this mast has to be limited so that it covers an area small enough not to have to support more conversations than the available channels can carry. Due to the sectorized arrangement of antennas on a tower, it is possible to vary the strength and angle of each sector depending on the coverage of other towers in view of the sector.

A cellphone may not work at times, because it is too far from a mast, but it may also not work because the phone is in a location where there is interference to the cell phone signal from thick building walls, hills or other structures. The signals do not need a clear line of sight but the more interference will degrade or eliminate reception. Too many people may be trying to use the cell mast at the same time, e.g. a traffic jam or a sports event, then there will be a signal on the phone display but it is blocked from starting a new connection. The other limiting factor for cell phones is the ability of the cell phone to send a signal from its low powered battery to the mast. Some cellphones perform better than others under low power or low battery, typically due to the ability to send a good signal from the phone to the mast.

The base station controller (a central computer that specializes in making phone connections) and the intelligence of the cellphone keeps track of and allows the phone to switch from one mast to the next during conversation. As the user moves towards a mast it picks the strongest signal and releases the mast from which the signal has become weaker; that channel on that mast becomes available to another user.

Completed in December 2009 at Epiphany Lutheran Church, in Lake Worth, Florida, this 100' tall cross conceals equipment for T-Mobile.

Trilateration

  1. Cell Site trilateration is used when GPS capable devices are incapable, cannot perform the actions required to acquire a GPS signal, or are not yet equipped with this technology. The process of locating a cell phone on the wireless network through trilateration is usually inaccurate-- which is why the preferred way to find a mobile phone is through GPS. It starts with the mobile phone sending a signal to the nearest three cell sites in the vicinity, then the towers analyze the data sent by the phone and calculate the distance between each cell site and the mobile phone. The cell towers detect the radius of each others signal and find the point where all three towers overlap. This area can be anywhere from 0.6 miles to 3 miles.[4]
  2. Angle of Arrival (AOA) is another way of locating a mobile phone. It requires at least two towers, locating the caller at the point where the lines along the angles from each tower intersect.
  3. The last is a much less accurate way of locating a mobile phone. It requires the use of only one tower. The tower estimates the distance between the mobile phone and the tower, which can differ between several miles in rural areas.

In 2006, companies like T-Mobile and AT&T Mobility implemented GPS units into all of their devices, regardless of the ability for the user to use it. Enhanced 911 or E911 service required, by December 31, 2005 that at least 95% of cellular phones in the U.S. had to be an E911 compliant. Many companies missed this deadline and were fined by the Federal Communications Commission.

Cost and power use

A conventional base station costs about $100,000 and uses 3000 watts of power. [2]

New, more efficient ones cost around $15,000 and use 100 watts of power. [3]

Temporary set-up

Cell-on-wheels, or COW.

Although cell antennas are normally attached to permanent structures, cell providers maintain a fleet of temporary cell sites. When mounted on a trailer, they are called a COW or Cell On Wheels. These usually include a base station controller and a telescoping tower with antennas attached. A generator may be included when electrical power isn't available, and an additional backhaul antenna may be mounted to link the temporary tower into the network.

COWs are often used at the site of a permanent cell site. Floods, fires, terrorism, and other disasters may destroy permanent antennas or base stations controllers, and fast dispatch of COWs can maintain vital communications during an emergency. They are also used in planned outages, such as when an antenna site is unavailable due to construction or maintenance. Finally, they are often used to augment capacity when large numbers of additional cell phone users are expected, such as at large sporting events.

Emergency power

Fuel cell backup power systems are added to critical cell sites or base stations to provide emergency power. In reality though, few cell sites use fuel cells and use internal combustion engine driven generator sets. [5][6].

Health and property effects

While there is no clear evidence for any significant health effects from cell sites, a minority of the population fears that close-by towers can negatively impact their health, sleeping patterns and so on. Despite these concerns, research (such as in New Zealand, at the University of Auckland), has found that the presence of a cell tower does not impact housing values. Over 3000 home sales within 500m of 46 cell towers were assessed in price, with the study broken up in 50m increments. However, some real estate agents responded to the study with anecdotal cases where close-by cell towers had caused deals to go sour, or to be struck only for smaller figures than usual.[7]

See also

In fact, the preferred location for cell towers is almost completely opposite now. Much of the operations are now centered on sites that are closer to the ground, allowing for greater bandwidths. This means that cell phone users have more tower locations and can therefore use more services. The towers have changed from "best location" to "multiple location" technology.

References

  1. ^ International Engineering Consortium On-line Education, "Cellular Communications" undated, URL retrieved 14 August 2007.
  2. ^ Frequently Asked PCS Questions undated, URL retrieved 14 August 2007.
  3. ^ NTIA Seeks Input on Broadband Stimulus Money undated, URL retrieved 3 March 2009.
  4. ^ [1]
  5. ^ Ballard fuel cells to power telecom backup power units for motorola
  6. ^ India telecoms to get fuel cell power
  7. ^ "Cell towers don't affect property values, says researcher". The New Zealand Herald. 2010-02-05. Retrieved 5 February 2010.

External links