Jump to content

Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SchuminWeb (talk | contribs)
95,920 edits
m Reverted to revision 315131966 by LLorton; What does this have to do with...?. using TW
Line 29: Line 29:


[[User:LLorton|LLorton]] ([[User talk:LLorton|talk]]) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
[[User:LLorton|LLorton]] ([[User talk:LLorton|talk]]) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

== discussion archives links ==

Hi, SchuminWeb why didn't you put links to the discussion archives of this page when you archived them? At first I thought there was no discussion on this article as there are no links to the archives. Here are the links to the archives you created for this discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_5

cheers,
Jamie[[Special:Contributions/24.108.77.192|24.108.77.192]] ([[User talk:24.108.77.192|talk]]) 23:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:42, 19 March 2010

WikiProject iconAnti-war B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

hint

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/7683877/give_peace_a_chance/?rnd=1141443516255&has-player=true&version=6.0.12.1059

Removed this material from the anti-semitism section as it was off the topic of the piece.

The story received mainstream media coverage, but when Lerner later indicated he had not asked to speak at the rally, the L.A. Weekly concluded, "the Lerner brouhaha was less hot-buttoned than advertised."[1]

LLorton (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SchuminWeb why didn't you put links to the discussion archives of this page when you archived them? At first I thought there was no discussion on this article as there are no links to the archives. Here are the links to the archives you created for this discussion page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R./Archive_5

cheers, Jamie24.108.77.192 (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Blume, Howard (2003-02-13). "Left takes up cause of rabbi who had criticized anti-war group". LA Weekly. Retrieved 2006-01-19.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:A.N.S.W.E.R.&oldid=350883692"