Talk:Linear referencing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'Sigh.......... : Look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_Reference_System&diff=353018455&oldid=353018050 this edit]. That's why I put the "conte...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sigh.......... |
Sigh.......... |
||
: |
: |
||
Look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_Reference_System&diff=353018455&oldid=353018050 this edit]. That's why I put the "context" tag there. Someone's come down with a really bad case of [[déformation professionnelle]]. |
Look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_Reference_System&diff=353018455&oldid=353018050 this edit]. That's why I put the "context" tag there. Someone's come down with a really bad case of [[déformation professionnelle]]. If this is about geography or geodesy or cartography or something like that, it needs to say so in the first setence. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] ([[User talk:Michael Hardy|talk]]) 20:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC) |
||
: ...consider to be less arrogant ("really bad case of déformation professionnelle"). As you see, a series of people have been working on it. Just improve the article if you don't like it. Regards, [[User:Bumbulski|Bumbulski]] ([[User talk:Bumbulski|talk]]) 06:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:50, 31 March 2010
Sigh..........
Look at this edit. That's why I put the "context" tag there. Someone's come down with a really bad case of déformation professionnelle. If this is about geography or geodesy or cartography or something like that, it needs to say so in the first setence. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- ...consider to be less arrogant ("really bad case of déformation professionnelle"). As you see, a series of people have been working on it. Just improve the article if you don't like it. Regards, Bumbulski (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)