Jump to content

User talk:Str8cash: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AfD nomination of I'm On It. (TW)
Socks: new section
Line 3: Line 3:


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[I'm On It]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm On It]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 05:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[I'm On It]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm On It]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:SummerPhD|SummerPhD]] ([[User talk:SummerPhD|talk]]) 05:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

== Socks ==

I revert all edits by banned users unless they are obvious vandalism reversion. If you want to check the edits out and reinstate them if you find them to be accurate, that's fine, but when you do so, you are taking responsibility for the accuracy of the edits. I simply return things to the state they would have been in if the banned editor had not edited at all. See [[WP:BAN#Bans apply to all editing, good or bad]].&mdash;[[User:Kww|Kww]]([[User talk:Kww|talk]]) 21:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:11, 8 April 2010

I have nominated I'm On It, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm On It. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 05:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Socks

I revert all edits by banned users unless they are obvious vandalism reversion. If you want to check the edits out and reinstate them if you find them to be accurate, that's fine, but when you do so, you are taking responsibility for the accuracy of the edits. I simply return things to the state they would have been in if the banned editor had not edited at all. See WP:BAN#Bans apply to all editing, good or bad.—Kww(talk) 21:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]