Jump to content

Talk:List of Good Eats episodes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ferndave (talk | contribs)
Line 46: Line 46:
::: I wouldn't mind that. But where did the current number come from? It might not be worth keeping at all. And I do have to wonder whether there is a style point here. Is there a Wiki guideline for numbering TV episodes? [[User:Dmforcier|Dmforcier]] ([[User talk:Dmforcier|talk]]) 15:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
::: I wouldn't mind that. But where did the current number come from? It might not be worth keeping at all. And I do have to wonder whether there is a style point here. Is there a Wiki guideline for numbering TV episodes? [[User:Dmforcier|Dmforcier]] ([[User talk:Dmforcier|talk]]) 15:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
::: Well! After a lot of playing around with formatting, I may have hit on a usable solution. Check out the Specials section. I've used several fields in the template, including Production Code. [[User:Dmforcier|Dmforcier]] ([[User talk:Dmforcier|talk]]) 18:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
::: Well! After a lot of playing around with formatting, I may have hit on a usable solution. Check out the Specials section. I've used several fields in the template, including Production Code. [[User:Dmforcier|Dmforcier]] ([[User talk:Dmforcier|talk]]) 18:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

:::: I like it. Include the production code for reference and completeness and order them by air date. Best of both worlds. [[User:Ferndave|ferndave]] ([[User talk:Ferndave|talk]]) 04:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


== Changing the episode numbering scheme ==
== Changing the episode numbering scheme ==

Revision as of 04:30, 11 April 2010

This is one of the most useful pages on the internet

A constant point of reference for the GE fan. Keep up the good work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.72.10 (talk) 20:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should there be a list of the references for each title?

It seems that most episode titles are either puns or references to other works. Should another column be added explaining the references? --Kaosblaze (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm against it. Dmforcier (talk) 18:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone think that would be a problem? i don't know if that would be violating the formating rules for episode pages

--Hadees (talk) 06:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To individual recipes? IMO it would be impossible. Few recipes are mentioned in the episode list so there's nothing to hang links on. Second, given a link to the recipe site (which should be in the References section), it's easy enough to find a specific recipe. And aren't they listed by episode there anyway? Dmforcier (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding an Equipment column to the tables

Of as much interest to me as the techniques are AB's (and W's) equipment criteria. Since some episodes have no such segment and the equipment discussed can't always be inferred from the topic - for instance, in which episode does he discuss spatulas? - adding a column for this makes sense.

I've edited the Season 1 table as an example. (Note that I haven't filled in the cells yet, and the "Ice Cream Freezers" entry may be bogus.)

Opinions? What about the column title?

Dmforcier (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Production Number vs. Air Date

Back in October '09 the episode numbering was changed from Air Date to Food Network's production number. While it now follows the order on foodnetwork.com, it conflicts with the Good Eats The Early Years book and original air dates. Any thoughts on that? ferndave (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The episode numbering was changed where, here? What exactly is in conflict with the book? IMO the episodes should be numbered (here) by the production number and ordered (here) by air date. Dmforcier (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, back on October 4th of '09. Check the history notes for the exact revision. The problem is that the episode number and order given on foodnetwork.com is sometimes different from the air dates. While book appears to order them by the air dates. The book doesn't list the air date, but does follow the old list order. Should we use the air date order, but add the foodnetwork episode number like this for example?
#-Ep. Code Title Featured Food/Topic Equipment Originally Aired
01–EA1A01"Steak Your Claim"SteakCast iron skillet7 July 1999 (1999-07-07)
ferndave (talk) 05:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't mind that. But where did the current number come from? It might not be worth keeping at all. And I do have to wonder whether there is a style point here. Is there a Wiki guideline for numbering TV episodes? Dmforcier (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well! After a lot of playing around with formatting, I may have hit on a usable solution. Check out the Specials section. I've used several fields in the template, including Production Code. Dmforcier (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like it. Include the production code for reference and completeness and order them by air date. Best of both worlds. ferndave (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the episode numbering scheme

We've kinda screwed up by using the current numbering scheme - episodes numbered sequentially within a Season. The Episode Number can be used as a reference to the entry on this page, e.g. [[#epS01]] or [[List of Good Eats episodes#epS01]] to refer to an episode numbered "S01" (in this case I've used it for Special #1). Unfortunately we have about 15 [[#ep1]] so references won't work. I've been referring to specific episodes in footnotes here, and in other food related articles. So the ability to link directly to the episode would be great!

I propose that we change the episode numbering to ssnn where ss is the season number and nn is the episode number. Specials and shorts would use a letter (or several) for ss. Check out the Specials section where I've done that (and a couple other little tricks) to see what it would look like. Opinions? Dmforcier (talk) 18:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]