Talk:Medical device: Difference between revisions
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
--[[Special:Contributions/124.78.210.113|124.78.210.113]] ([[User talk:124.78.210.113|talk]]) 03:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC) |
--[[Special:Contributions/124.78.210.113|124.78.210.113]] ([[User talk:124.78.210.113|talk]]) 03:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC) |
||
* {{See|Verification and validation}} |
* See the term {{See|Verification and validation}} |
||
--[[Special:Contributions/222.67.203.108|222.67.203.108]] ([[User talk:222.67.203.108|talk]]) 01:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
--[[Special:Contributions/222.67.203.108|222.67.203.108]] ([[User talk:222.67.203.108|talk]]) 01:50, 12 April 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:52, 12 April 2010
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Medicine Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Where's Canada's medical devices???
I know Canada only has 1/10th the population of the United States of America, but usually I can depend on Wikipedia having information for us too. Usually we're included as a footnote after USA. I am surprised I could not find a single reference to the word Canada (or even North America) in the entire article. I came here looking for some information what is considered a medical device. For myself I'm seeking this definition for tax purposes, I want to see for what reason the government doesn't accept weights (used for exercise) as medical devices (which logically help you live longer, stronger, healthier). As many adjectives as I can use though, it doesn't matter I'm sure they'll still decline it if I submit that... Well maybe I'm not sure that's why I'm looking. Nastajus (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Medical devices vs. equipment vs. supplies vs. products
I would like to see a brief general discussion of the different broad terms commonly used for medical devices / equipment / supplies / products, etc., with an explanation of how they overlap and differ, a few good examples that illustrate the differences between these terms.Thomas.Hedden (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Thomas: Only medical device is an official legally-defined term. The other words you list have dictionary definitions. I do not think any special discussion is necessary. --Zeamays (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Raise this issue again....
Since there is no academic publishing standard for me to track which is similar to ISO 13485, the sections of Academic resources and Industrial resources are only of my preferences. Welcome others to edit them to reach a consensus--222.67.216.32 (talk) 06:01, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- You might take a look at WP:AJ and ask for help on the talk page...not sure if it's what you're looking for. If not, you could also post a request at WP:RSN. Flowanda | Talk 02:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It's interesting....
I'm interesting to know when ISO is doing tracking of my google search, as the return results are very different with the time within a day and the later result will always suit my needs and taste. Thanks ISO to treat me as a VIP, hey ~__^.--222.67.216.32 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Will this site (Wikipedia) be closed off according to .....
This guidance? ~__^
http://www.fda.gov/oc/op/goodreprint.html --222.67.202.23 (talk) 07:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
If so, wiki admin please provide us a backup site for downloading the articles generated by this site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.67.202.23 (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Ozone Therapy Device
1, The Basic Ozone Device Ozomed® Basic Technical data - Table top model, dimensions: 310 x 290 x 110 mm, weight: 5.1
kg - Ozone concentration: 0 - 80 µg/ml - Electrical data: 220 - 240V, 50 - 60 cycles, 100 VA,
Protection class I, Type B - CE certified: CE0368
2,The Universal Ozone Device Ozomed® Universal Technical data - Mobile therapy center with integrated infusion stand and oxygen
bottle, dimensions: 350 x 280 x 730 mm, weight 25 kg - Ozone concentration: 0 - 99 µg/ml automatic calibrated - Electrical data: 220 - 240V, 50 - 60 cycles, 250 VA, Protection
class I, Type B - CE certified: CE0368 Kastner-Praxisbedarf GmbH, located in Wetzlar Germany is a world-
renowned manufacturer specializing in Ozone Therapy Device
manufacturing. And we are Kastner-Praxisbedarf GmbH China Office in
Beijing.Kastner-Praxisbedarf GmbH China office is Kastner’s
international Sales Department. Since 1980, we commit ourselves to
activated-oxygen therapies as Ozone therapy, and now have developed us
to a worldwide leading provider of innovative therapy devices for all
Ozone-applications. contact us:
name :clarence skype:clarence813 MSN: jiansan@live.cn website:http://www.kastner-sinco.com/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarencexu (talk • contribs) 02:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Ansiscope
I removed the Ansiscope reference in the Class lists of devices as that is a brand-name of a device; not a type of device. [ref]http://www.dyansys.com/portable_ansiscope.php[/ref] 63.211.227.66 (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
what is medical instruments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.208.91.248 (talk) 11:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
The topic about the System suitability test....
--124.78.210.113 (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- See the term