User talk:Jacurek

ArbCom case amendment request

[1]

He does it again

Help me with this, because I am afraid I won't be able to hold myself from WP:PA.--Mikej007 (talk) 07:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

For continued battleground conduct in the domain you are topic-banned from, including this personal attack, you are blocked for another 3 months. Next time you are found to edit disruptively, be it inside the Arbcom-imposed period of topic ban or afterwards, will mean an indefinite block. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

...and I'm sure that you will be the one to make the judgment and you will execute the block if any, am I right? :) Remember this E-mail FP? You have sent to me accidently???

You still doing it.--Jacurek (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Are you going to also block Matthead for this [[2]] personal attack on Polish editor?--Jacurek (talk) 02:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC) What about this [[3]] pathetic personal attack by Dan?

Watch the end of the video he attacked Loosmark with. Are you going to block Matthead and Dan dear FP :)?--Jacurek (talk) 04:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

To FP.

Are you going to respond to my questions? When will you stop blocking Polish editors ONLY ignoring nasty behaviour of people like Matthead, Dan etc.? (see links above) You are completely biased, unfair and you should not be an administrator. The issue of your biased actions should be soon addressed at the appropriate forum, just to let you know.--Jacurek (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Controversial command decisions, World War II

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Controversial command decisions, World War II. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial command decisions, World War II. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Jan Dzierzon

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

---

Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) --Soujdspo (talk) 02:24, 12 April 2010 (UTC)