Faà di Bruno's formula: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎References: *{{citation|first=Steven|last=Krantz|first2=Parks|last2=Harold R.|title=A Primer of Real Analytic Functions|
Bluemaster (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Faà di Bruno's formula''' is an identity in [[mathematics]] generalizing the [[chain rule]] to higher derivatives, named after {{harvs|txt|authorlink=Francesco Faà di Bruno|first=Francesco|last= Faà di Bruno|year=1855|year2=1857}}, though he was not the first to state or prove the formula. Perhaps the most well-known form of Faà di Bruno's formula says that
'''Faà di Bruno's formula''' is an identity in [[mathematics]] generalizing the [[chain rule]] to higher derivatives, named after {{harvs|txt|authorlink=Francesco Faà di Bruno|first=Francesco|last= Faà di Bruno|year=1855|year2=1857}}, though he was not the first to state or prove the formula. In 1800, the French mathematician [[Louis François Antoine Arbogast]] stated the formula in a calculus textbook,<ref>{{cite book |first=L.F.A.|last=Arbogast|title=Du calcul des derivations, Levrault, Strasbourg, 1800.|
year=1800|publisher=Levrault|place=Strasbourg}}</ref> more than 50 years before Faà di Bruno, being the first published reference on the subject.<ref>{{cite journal |First=A.D.D. |last=Craik |title=Prehistory of Faà di Bruno's Formula |journal=[[American Mathematical Monthly]] |volume=112 |year=2005 |pages=217–234|issue=2}}</ref>

Perhaps the most well-known form of Faà di Bruno's formula says that


:<math>{d^n \over dx^n} f(g(x))=\sum \frac{n!}{m_1!\,1!^{m_1}\,m_2!\,2!^{m_2}\,\cdots\,m_n!\,n!^{m_n}} f^{(m_1+\cdots+m_n)}(g(x)) \prod_{j=1}^n\left(g^{(j)}(x)\right)^{m_j},</math>
:<math>{d^n \over dx^n} f(g(x))=\sum \frac{n!}{m_1!\,1!^{m_1}\,m_2!\,2!^{m_2}\,\cdots\,m_n!\,n!^{m_n}} f^{(m_1+\cdots+m_n)}(g(x)) \prod_{j=1}^n\left(g^{(j)}(x)\right)^{m_j},</math>
Line 182: Line 185:
If ''f''(''x'') = e<sup>''x''</sup> then all of the derivatives of ''f'' are the same, and are a factor common to every term. In case ''g''(''x'') is a [[cumulant-generating function]], then ''f''(''g''(''x'')) is a [[moment-generating function]], and the polynomial in various derivatives of ''g'' is the polynomial that expresses the [[moment (mathematics)|moment]]s as functions of the [[cumulant]]s.
If ''f''(''x'') = e<sup>''x''</sup> then all of the derivatives of ''f'' are the same, and are a factor common to every term. In case ''g''(''x'') is a [[cumulant-generating function]], then ''f''(''g''(''x'')) is a [[moment-generating function]], and the polynomial in various derivatives of ''g'' is the polynomial that expresses the [[moment (mathematics)|moment]]s as functions of the [[cumulant]]s.


==References==
==Cited References==
<references/>
<references/>
==Other References==
*{{Cite journal|last=Faà di Bruno|title=Sullo sviluppo delle Funzioni|journal= Annali di Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche |volume=6 |year=1855|pages=479–480}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Faà di Bruno|title=Sullo sviluppo delle Funzioni|journal= Annali di Scienze Matematiche e Fisiche |volume=6 |year=1855|pages=479–480}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Faà di Bruno|title= Note sur une nouvelle formule de calcul differentiel|journal= Quarterly J. Pure Appl. Math. 1 |year=1857|pages= 359–360}}
*{{Cite journal|last=Faà di Bruno|title= Note sur une nouvelle formule de calcul differentiel|journal= Quarterly J. Pure Appl. Math. 1 |year=1857|pages= 359–360}}
* {{cite journal |author=W.P. Johnson |title=The Curious History of Faà di Bruno's Formula |journal=[[American Mathematical Monthly]] |volume=109 |year=2002 |pages=217–234 |url=http://www.maa.org/news/monthly217-234.pdf |doi=10.2307/2695352 |issue=3}}
*{{cite journal |author=W.P. Johnson |title=The Curious History of Faà di Bruno's Formula |journal=[[American Mathematical Monthly]] |volume=109 |year=2002 |pages=217–234 |url=http://www.maa.org/news/monthly217-234.pdf |doi=10.2307/2695352 |issue=3}}
*{{citation|first=Steven|last=Krantz|first2=Parks|last2=Harold R.|title=A Primer of Real Analytic Functions|
*{{citation|first=Steven|last=Krantz|first2=Parks|last2=Harold R.|title=A Primer of Real Analytic Functions|
year=2002|edition=Second|publisher=Birkhäuser|id = ISBN 0817642641|isbn=0-8176-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1}}
year=2002|edition=Second|publisher=Birkhäuser|id = ISBN 0817642641|isbn=0-8176-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1, 3-7643-4264-1}}


==External links==
==External links==

Revision as of 01:03, 3 May 2010

Faà di Bruno's formula is an identity in mathematics generalizing the chain rule to higher derivatives, named after Francesco Faà di Bruno (1855, 1857), though he was not the first to state or prove the formula. In 1800, the French mathematician Louis François Antoine Arbogast stated the formula in a calculus textbook,[1] more than 50 years before Faà di Bruno, being the first published reference on the subject.[2]

Perhaps the most well-known form of Faà di Bruno's formula says that

where the sum is over all n-tuples (m1, ..., mn) satisfying the constraint

Sometimes, to give it a pleasing and memorable pattern, it is written in a way in which the coefficients that have the combinatorial interpretation discussed below are less explicit:

Combining the terms with the same value of m1 + m2 + ... + mn = k and noticing that m j has to be zero for j > n − k + 1 leads to another somewhat simpler formula expressed in terms of Bell polynomials Bn,k(x1,...,xnk+1):

Combinatorial form

The formula has a "combinatorial" form:

where

  • "B ∈ π" means the variable B runs through the list of all of the "blocks" of the partition π, and
  • |A| denotes the cardinality of the set A (so that |π| is the number of blocks in the partition π and |B| is the size of the block B).

Explication via an example

The combinatorial form may initially seem forbidding, so let us examine a concrete case, and see what the pattern is:

What is the pattern?

The factor corresponds to the partition 2 + 1 + 1 of the integer 4, in the obvious way. The factor that goes with it corresponds to the fact that there are three summands in that partition. The coefficient 6 that goes with those factors corresponds to the fact that there are exactly six partitions of a set of four members that break it into one part of size 2 and two parts of size 1.

Similarly, the factor in the third line corresponds to the partition 2 + 2 of the integer 4, (4, because we are finding the fourth derivative), while corresponds to the fact that there are two summands (2 + 2) in that partition. The coefficient 3 corresponds to the fact that there are 3 ways of partitioning 4 objects into groups of 2 (4C2 ÷ 2). The same concept applies to the others.

Combinatorics of the Faà di Bruno coefficients

These partition-counting Faà di Bruno coefficients have a "closed-form" expression. The number of partitions of a set of size n corresponding to the integer partition

of the integer n is equal to

These coefficients also arise in the Bell polynomials, which are relevant to the study of cumulants.

Multivariate version

Let y = g(x1, ..., xn). Then the following identity holds regardless of whether the n variables are all distinct, or all identical, or partitioned into several distinguishable classes of indistinguishable variables (if it seems opaque, see the very concrete example below):[3]

where (as above)

  • "B ∈ π" means the variable B runs through the list of all of the "blocks" of the partition π, and
  • |A| denotes the cardinality of the set A (so that |π| is the number of blocks in the partition π and |B| is the size of the block B).

A further generalization, due to Tsoy-Wo Ma, considers the case where y is a vector-valued variable.[4]

Example

The five terms in the following expression correspond in the obvious way to the five partitions of the set { 1, 2, 3 }, and in each case the order of the derivative of f is the number of parts in the partition:



If the three variables are indistinguishable from each other, then three of the five terms above are also indistinguishable from each other, and then we have the classic one-variable formula.

Formal power series version

In the formal power series

we have the nth derivative at 0:

This should not be construed as the value of a function, since these series are purely formal; there is no such thing as convergence or divergence in this context.

If

and

and

then the coefficient cn (which would be the nth derivative of h evaluated at 0 if we were dealing with convergent series rather than formal power series) is given by

where π runs through the set of all partitions of the set { 1, ..., n } and B1, ..., Bk are the blocks of the partition π, and | Bj | is the number of members of the jth block, for j = 1, ..., k.

This version of the formula is particularly well suited to the purposes of combinatorics. [5]

We can also write

where Bn,k(a1,...,ank+1) are Bell polynomials.

A special case

If f(x) = ex then all of the derivatives of f are the same, and are a factor common to every term. In case g(x) is a cumulant-generating function, then f(g(x)) is a moment-generating function, and the polynomial in various derivatives of g is the polynomial that expresses the moments as functions of the cumulants.

Cited References

  1. ^ Arbogast, L.F.A. (1800). Du calcul des derivations, Levrault, Strasbourg, 1800. Strasbourg: Levrault.
  2. ^ Craik (2005). "Prehistory of Faà di Bruno's Formula". American Mathematical Monthly. 112 (2): 217–234. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |First= ignored (|first= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Hardy, Michael (2006). "Combinatorics of Partial Derivatives". Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 13 (1): R1.
  4. ^ Ma, Tsoy Wo (2009). "Higher Chain Formula proved by Combinatorics". Electronic Journal of Combinatorics. 16 (1): N21.
  5. ^ See the "compositional formula" in Chapter 5 of Richard P. Stanley (1997, 1999). Enumerative Combinatorics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-55309-1N. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: invalid character (help); Check date values in: |year= (help)

Other References

External links