Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 May 18: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:54, 18 May 2010

< May 17	May 19 >

May 18

File:Internet Usage Charts.PNG

This is an orphaned, outdated browser marketshare chart — from 2006. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Internet Explorer usage share.png

Almost orphaned, outdated Internet Explorer usage share graph — from 2006. Note that this file is part of the history of the SVG version, so that would have to be copied over. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:25, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:InternetExplorer2forMac.png

This is tagged as public domain, but it clearly is an orphaned fair use screenshot. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:30, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Internet-explorers-apcalculusexam.gif

This file is orphaned and out of scope of our project. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Internationalvol1.jpg

Orphaned image that is out of scope of our project PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:33, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:International accumulation of foreign reserve currencies.png

Orphaned, outdated graph from 2007 PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArticlesForCreationEntry.JPG

This is an orphaned screenshot of how to submit an AfC submission. The new article wizard, which all AfC submissions now go through, does not look like this, since the AfC process has changed. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArticlesForCreationRedirect.JPG

This is an orphaned screenshot of how to submit an AfC submission. The new article wizard, which all AfC submissions now go through, does not look like this, since the AfC process has changed. PleaseStand ^(talk) 02:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Recoverycover.jpg

Disputed validity of cover, image found at this source but nowhere does it state that it is the official cover. Taylor Karras (talk | contribs | Rcool35) 05:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm glad you brought it up; I reduced the size and sort of questioned its source, but I saw it several weeks ago elsewhere and thought nothing of it. However, Tineye doesn't bring up any immediate matches, and Google images returns a slew of covers that I don't think have any connection to Eminem. Simply for lack of verifiability, I'd say remove it. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 05:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've given enough reasons to prove that the Cover is fake in the discussion page . I hope it gets deleted .Asid12345678 (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RUeyegouge.jpg

Nominating per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 10, which was closed as overturn and list at FfD. The primary arguments for deletion appear to be the image failing WP:NFCC#8 as merely decorative and failing WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable. Procedural nomination; I am neutral. Tim Song (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think it should be kept as it's not really decorative if it's showing you what an eye-gouge can do to people which is helpful in describing in context of the page in which it was on. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not satisfied that this is irreplaceable by any other free photo of the consequences of an eye gouge. Image is unnecessary to show the consequences of an eye gouge. Presumably eye gouges cause different consequences: some severe, some not severe. All this photo does is show the consequences of this particular eye gouging incident, and that's not what the article is about. It is about eye gouging generally. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep Any replacement would not serve the same encyclopedic purpose Gnevin (talk) 07:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep As per Gnevin, plus it could be hardly said to be decorative, its awful, but I can't think of a better image to highlight the dangers of gouging. G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 08:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Mkativerata. Image fails WP:NFCC#1. The image is used to illustrate an eye-gouge. Even if this one is particularly bad, any such image could replace this since the image is not used to illustrate a particular incident. Rettetast (talk) 15:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 :'''Delete''' I'm glad you brought it up; I reduced the size and sort of questioned its source, but I saw it several weeks ago elsewhere and thought nothing of it. However, Tineye doesn't bring up any immediate matches, and Google images returns a slew of covers that I don't think have any connection to Eminem. Simply for lack of verifiability, I'd say remove it. – <i><font color="#104FFF">Ker</font><font color="#187FFF">αun</font><font color="#18AFFF">oςc</font><font color="#18DFFF">op</font><font color="#18FFFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">[[User_talk:Keraunoscopia|galaxies]]</font></sub></i> 05:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
-I've given enough reasons to prove that the Cover is fake in the discussion page . I hope it gets deleted .[[User:Asid12345678|Asid12345678]] ([[User talk:Asid12345678|talk]]) 15:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
+:'''Delete''' I've given enough reasons to prove that the Cover is fake in the discussion page . I hope it gets deleted .[[User:Asid12345678|Asid12345678]] ([[User talk:Asid12345678|talk]]) 15:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 ====[[:File:RUeyegouge.jpg]]====