Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Orp: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:04, 2 June 2010

Ron Orp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy contested, is a valid article on de:wiki. Elevating for discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Examining de:Ron Orp, I see only two newspaper articles, one looks like a bit of local interest/PR story, leaving the Brazil launch story which also looks very "press release". To meet WP:ORG there has to be significant impact. I'm commenting as "weak delete" as better sources may be forthcoming from those with access to German news. Fæ (talk) 14:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep dont see any reason for deletion. this articles subject has reached the level of notability needed.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per notability. just keep,.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 22:06, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, only one !vote per customer. - UtherSRG (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 04:45, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 04:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per his own notability. plus sourcing.--195.84.41.1 (talk) 06:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 04:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''':  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Brazil|list of Brazil-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:UtherSRG|UtherSRG]] [[User_talk:UtherSRG|(talk)]] 04:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Keep''' per his own notability. plus sourcing.--[[Special:Contributions/195.84.41.1|195.84.41.1]] ([[User talk:195.84.41.1|talk]]) 06:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC)