Talk:Ben: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:35, 25 January 2006

There seems to be a general concensus that ben is gay. However I am not sure that this meets the quality standards set forth by Wikipedia. I will be reverting this article back to something more in line with these standards.

P.S. I am not gay.

indeed.. well said User_talk:Supernathan. i'm ben, and also not gay, though for a guy that's not gay i have tended to pass an odd number of moments talking about sucking cock in front of potentially lethal homophobes. but faq it, right? takes true grit, i guess, and most of us are chock full of that shit, right? but my question is this: what does your post have to do with this wikipedia article? if i wasn't reasonably certain that it would be such a collosal faqqin pain in the ass to figure out the myriad areas of knowledge and rules one must pledge to get to the point where it worked simply, i might be forgivable for initiating deletion proceedings on your talk page post, and i'm a strong proponet of the liberal application of justification of talk page posts.

i cannot for the life of me figure out what you're talking about vis-a-vis the article. could you elaborate? -:)Ozzyslovechild 02:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 P.S. I am not gay.
+:indeed.. well said [[User_talk:Supernathan]].  i'm ben, and also not gay, though for a guy that's not gay i have tended to pass an odd number of moments talking about sucking cock in front of potentially lethal homophobes.  but faq it, right?  takes true grit, i guess, and most of us are chock full of that shit, right?  but my question is this:  what does your post have to do with this wikipedia article?  if i wasn't reasonably certain that it would be such a collosal faqqin pain in the ass to figure out the myriad areas of knowledge and rules one must pledge to get to the point where it worked simply, i might be forgivable for initiating deletion proceedings on your talk page post, and i'm a strong proponet of the liberal application of justification of talk page posts.
+:i cannot for the life of me figure out what you're talking about vis-a-vis the article.  could you elaborate? -:)[[User:Ozzyslovechild|Ozzyslovechild]] 02:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)