Talk:Grotesque: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:38, 15 June 2010

Philosophy: Aesthetics C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

pumpkins

WHat do pumpkins have to do with the Grotesque?

They're grotesque. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech "groteska"

The Czech (and also Polish?) "groteska" is silent comedies (Chaplin, for example, with a lot of slapstick) and also puppet theatre. What is the origin of this usage of the term? Sladek 14:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sladek (talk • contribs) 16:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

why this

How is this helpful or even meaningful? Sherwood Anderson, in his 1919 short story collection Winesburg, Ohio, included a prefatory chapter titled "The Book of the Grotesque" in which he established the idea of the grotesque character as an overarching principle in his book. So what, his book has something grotesque? Or is he defining it, and if so, how and why?--Flammingo^Hey 22:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was relevant to a discussion of the grotesque in literature that a major work of American literature explicitly defined itself as "grotesque." I think it's worth keeping in. Ellisjudd (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is relevant, but its gone now. Someone should put it back in. Sherwood Anderson coined the phrase as we use it to refer to American lit.

Darth Vader

Could Darth Vader be considered a grotesque in fiction? After all, he does inspire both empathy and disgust. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 I thought it was relevant to a discussion of the grotesque in literature that a major work of American literature explicitly defined itself as "grotesque." I think it's worth keeping in. [[User:Ellisjudd|Ellisjudd]] ([[User talk:Ellisjudd|talk]]) 20:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
+It is relevant, but its gone now. Someone should put it back in. Sherwood Anderson coined the phrase as we use it to refer to American lit.
 ==[[Darth Vader]]==