User talk:Gromell

Image tagging for File:Rafiqui2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rafiqui2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bangladesh Liberation War appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Spitfire19 (Talk) 12:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Your Vandalism in Bengal tiger

This is regarding you edit to Bengal tiger; You have used deceit here and changed the figures of tigers in Bangladesh. Many of your contributions are biased too. You are advised to stop vandalism or u stand the risk of being banned. Arjun^codename024 18:27, 16 May 2010 (UTC) Absolutely rubbish. The number I reported was the accurate number of tigers found in Bangladesh according to government and private surveys done very recently. The sources are written in Bengali and that's why I did not cite them. The ridiculous number of around 200 tigers found in Bangladesh is the real vandalism act committed by some Indian, who probably cited some Indian propaganda newspaper. You do not even know what constitutes vandalism. Who are you to judge my factual writing as biased?