Talk:DOD Electronics

Article is nothing more than a list. Wordy McWordWord 01:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

A man who did delete or remove the article of DOD250 is deconstructive. Persons who governs Wikiworld are blockheads. Idiots always delete things correctly been. --220.105.223.9 (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Pot dating

I've been removing this material because:

• It is unsourced (see WP:V and WP:RS)
• It reads like original research (see WP:OR)
• It is "how-to" advice (see WP:NOT#HOWTO)
• Most of it (e.g. the inane details about the history of the serial numbers of one of the components) is way out-of-place for an encyclopaedia article. It doesn't impart any useful info to the casual reader, nor even a fairly-involved reader.

As long as these concerns exist, I'll continue to remove this material. Oli Filth^(talk) 15:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Big Pig (FX70P) information?

It's awfully odd that when talking about a company with as many products as DOD, there's some random paragraph about the Big Pig being some limited run (100 units only?) pedal that's supposed to be a nod to Dave Gilmour when the pedal was marketed as an extremely grungy distortion. The information has absolutely no references and I wonder if it's bogus. Anyone? 75.48.5.163 (talk) 07:11, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

I've removed this section. I agree that it's an non-cited rumor and it also did not fit well with the article. --66.30.193.254 (talk) 00:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)