Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refinery CMS: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Vote for keep - added more independent sources to increase notability |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
*'''Comment'''. (to the author) If you can improve the article sourcing I will give you a keep vote. I checked the CMS and seems good enough to have some independent coverage. Note thought that blog articles are rarely considered notable. Also, the number of followers and google group members cannot be used to establish verifiability ([[WP:V]]) and notability ([[WP:N]]) - these things that are necessary to get a wikipedia article. [[User:Pxtreme75|Pxtreme75]] ([[User talk:Pxtreme75|talk]]) 13:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Comment'''. (to the author) If you can improve the article sourcing I will give you a keep vote. I checked the CMS and seems good enough to have some independent coverage. Note thought that blog articles are rarely considered notable. Also, the number of followers and google group members cannot be used to establish verifiability ([[WP:V]]) and notability ([[WP:N]]) - these things that are necessary to get a wikipedia article. [[User:Pxtreme75|Pxtreme75]] ([[User talk:Pxtreme75|talk]]) 13:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - I've added more independent sources to the article establish notability ([[WP:N]]) |
|||
Revision as of 20:56, 11 July 2010
- Refinery CMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotion for non-notable software product; article by employee. The only independent source is [1], which is just a brief mention. Haakon (talk) 17:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, deleting this article is a step backwards. Below is a list of independent sources that build Refinery CMSs credibility:
Blog Articles
- http://www.tsdbrown.com/2010/03/22/refinery-cms-consider-it-if-you-are-searching-for-a-ruby-on-rails-cms
- http://ryanwood.com/past/2009/9/18/deploying-refinery-on-heroku/
- http://productive.dk/2010/05/18/relaunching-scrum-dk.html
- http://productive.dk/2010/04/06/make-attachment_fu-and-refinery-cms-work-with-amazon-s3-eu-buckets.html
- http://jitu-blog.blogspot.com/2010/06/faqs-plugin-for-refinery-cms.html
CMS Articles
- http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-cms/refinerycms-a-new-solution-for-the-ruby-on-rails-world-004939.php
- http://www.dreamcss.com/2009/11/6-open-source-ruby-on-rail-based-cms.html
Independent Commercial Tutorial for Refinery CMS
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/javascript-ajax/2-new-premium-tutorials-refinery-and-modernizr/
Association with a well known Ruby on Rails hosting Company
http://www.engineyard.com/partners/associate
Refinery CMS Featured on a popular Ruby Podcast: Ruby5
218 Google Group Members
http://groups.google.com/group/refinery-cms/about
554 GitHub followers
http://github.com/resolve/refinerycms
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.133.165 (talk • contribs) 2010-07-09 21:33:06 (UTC)
- Delete - no significant coverage by reliable independent sources to speak of.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - clear references listed above —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.133.165 (talk) 22:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC) This template must be substituted.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. (to the author) If you can improve the article sourcing I will give you a keep vote. I checked the CMS and seems good enough to have some independent coverage. Note thought that blog articles are rarely considered notable. Also, the number of followers and google group members cannot be used to establish verifiability (WP:V) and notability (WP:N) - these things that are necessary to get a wikipedia article. Pxtreme75 (talk) 13:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - I've added more independent sources to the article establish notability (WP:N)