User talk:Seb az86556: Difference between revisions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello Seb az86556! I've added my comments about this section in this discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Turkey#.22showing_both_sides.22 Please consider changing it, because the current edition of the article is not universally accepted. --EthemD (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Seb az86556! I'm been waiting for a while now, I hope you've been reading my contribution to the discussion about the Turkey article. The current version to which you have reverted the past article is biased and completely unacceptable. It has been in this state for the past days now, and I am wondering why you would keep it in that state. -EthemD (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You are fast today!

The K2 and Mount Everest edits.... within a minute! You beat me by just a few seconds, so tip'o the hat to you! Keep up the good work. Qwrk (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thaaaaank youp -- I'm not fast, I'm bored :P Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 09:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two thumbs up! Qwrk (talk) 09:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos from me too :-) Anna Lincoln 09:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Anna. Haven't seen you around in a while :) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 09:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I pop in and out these days. Hopefully I'll devote more time after summer. Anna Lincoln 09:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

anteis

I don't understand your contribution on this article, it is a neutral and objective article; just info. Maybe you could add more info in order to improve this article? M.D.A (talk) 13:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

see WP:COI Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 01:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for an explanation

You haven't given me any explicit answer yet. If this goes on I'll have to ask another administrator... I really don't understand the reason behind your actions. :S peace -EthemD (talk) 16:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator for English wikipedia. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 21:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duduk

Hi. Please have a look at talk of the article. We had a very long discussion about the origins of the instrument. The thing is that the instrument is popular with almost all the people of the Middle East and Caucasus, and there's no way to determine who invented it unless we have a time machine to travel back to the times when it was invented. And http://www.worldmusicalinstruments.com/ is not an academic source. Please join the discussion at talk to help us build a consensus. As for complains by the sock of the banned user, I will ask for semiprotection of the article, to stop edit warring by the banned user. Thank you for your contribution to the article. Regards, Grandmaster 06:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The anon posting at WP:ANI is apparently this banned user: [1] The "quack" comment was made by the admin who banned him. His talk is full of warnings by the admins to stop edit warring, please see User talk:Armoboy323. Grandmaster 07:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see. makes sense. I have no opinion about the instrument as such (I learned something new yesterday, didn't even know it existed :P) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 19:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. Thanks for trying to help. Grandmaster 20:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I RUN THIS SHOW

reported

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

go fuck yourself

I see. Thanks, I'll be watching more closely now. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO YOU CHILD? —Preceding unsigned comment added by I Run This Show (talk • contribs) 20:12, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, maybe have you blocked or something... we'll see... Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Katherine Daisy Anderson's talk page.
Message added 15:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at I-20's talk page.
Message added 17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pony express mail! —I-20 the highway 17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SB1070 Edits

You have twice recently removed content which has a source link and replaced it with content which is unsourced. Please note that Wikipedia requires verifiability, so unsourced content is against Wikipedia policy. Further, you have reverted sourced content without explanation. That is counter productive to the spirit of community Wikipedia strives to foster, is generally rude, and easily comes off as article ownership (whether or not it is intended as such). I think you can be a valuable contributor to Wikipedia, but I encourage you to become more familiar with Wikipedia policies and develop a spirit of cooperative labor. Edit warring does noone any good and is, generally, unproductive. If you need any help or would like to discuss this issue further, please don't hesitate to ask me. I'll do my best to work with you. -65.185.178.220 (talk) 23:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that it is a LEAD section does NOT remove the requirement for verifiability. Now, both of our versions serve as LEAD content, but ONLY my version meets the requirement of verifiability. In case you don't understand the policy on verifiability, I can point you to the policy page. You should also be familiar with the 3 revert rule which you are about to violate. This is to serve as a warning that you are about to violate it. -65.185.178.220 (talk) 00:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 65: / Line 65: @@
 {{talkback|I-20|hi|ts=17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)}}
 Pony express mail!  '''—[[User:I-20|<span style="color:black">I-20</span>]][[User talk:I-20|<span style="vertical-align:super;">the highway</span>]]''' 17:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
+==SB1070 Edits==
+You have twice recently removed content which has a source link and replaced it with content which is unsourced.  Please note that Wikipedia requires verifiability, so unsourced content is against Wikipedia policy.  Further, you have reverted sourced content without explanation.  That is counter productive to the spirit of community Wikipedia strives to foster, is generally rude, and easily comes off as article ownership (whether or not it is intended as such).  I think you can be a valuable contributor to Wikipedia, but I encourage you to become more familiar with Wikipedia policies and develop a spirit of cooperative labor.  Edit warring does noone any good and is, generally, unproductive.  If you need any help or would like to discuss this issue further, please don't hesitate to ask me.  I'll do my best to work with you. -[[Special:Contributions/65.185.178.220|65.185.178.220]] ([[User talk:65.185.178.220|talk]]) 23:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
+::The fact that it is a LEAD section does NOT remove the requirement for verifiability.  Now, both  of our versions serve as LEAD content, but ONLY my version meets the requirement of verifiability.  In case you don't understand the policy on verifiability, I can point you to the policy page.  You should also be familiar with the 3 revert rule which you are about to violate.  This is to serve as a warning that you are about to violate it. -[[Special:Contributions/65.185.178.220|65.185.178.220]] ([[User talk:65.185.178.220|talk]]) 00:08, 17 July 2010 (UTC)