Talk:Elizabeth I: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
URGENT NOTE HELP: |
URGENT NOTE HELP: |
||
In the process of adding a '''new link''' to additional text on the page |
In the process of adding a '''new link''' to additional text on the page Robert Dudley, '''Earl of Leicester''', pointing to robert dudley son of leycester, duca de northumbria, the page created was named Robert Dudley '''Earl of Leicester''', CONSEQUENTLY '''REDIRECTING THE LINK''' Robert Dudley, '''1st Earl of Leicester''' on this page TO THE WRONG ADDRESS. |
||
Correct page being: |
Correct page being: |
||
Revision as of 11:46, 27 May 2004
not enough information and it stinks
- Could you perhaps be a little more specific, anonymous user? Marnanel 19:37, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Under "Death", section 7: In later years[...] she showed an inclination towards her nephew, ironically the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, whom she had executed; but she never officially named him. [...] She was succeeded by James I of England, who was already James VI of Scotland.
Is James I the same nephew mentioned in that first sentence? He seems to be, from his own page, but it's not terribly clear. --Suitov
I think that there should be more information on who, what, were, when, and why, and the exeptional how!! it is a wonderful sight but that would really make it stand out
URGENT NOTE HELP:
In the process of adding a new link to additional text on the page Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, pointing to robert dudley son of leycester, duca de northumbria, the page created was named Robert Dudley Earl of Leicester, CONSEQUENTLY REDIRECTING THE LINK Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester on this page TO THE WRONG ADDRESS.
Correct page being: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Dudley%2C_1st_Earl_of_Leicester
Faedra.