Jump to content

California Watch: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
Added history section
Line 33: Line 33:


California Watch is supported by major grants from the James Irvine Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the California Endowment, and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.<ref name="about"></ref>
California Watch is supported by major grants from the James Irvine Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the California Endowment, and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.<ref name="about"></ref>

==History==
===Founding===
California Watch officially launched January 4, 2010, after a soft-launch period and months of preparation. Editorial Director Mark Katches claims 85 reporters covered the California state house 10 years ago, while there are fewer than 25 today. He sees California Watch as filling a "big void in doing investigative work in California."<ref name="Nieman">Martin Langeveld. [http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/01/california-watch-the-latest-entrant-in-the-dot-org-journalism-boom/ "California Watch: The latest entrant in the dot-org journalism boom."] ''Nieman Journalism Lab'', 5 Jan. 2010.</ref> California Watch assembled the largest investigative team in the state with seven reporters, two multimedia producers and two editors to begin its news-gathering operation.<ref name="Nieman"></ref>

Katches gathered a team with impressive resumes in investigative work, including longtime San Francisco Chronicle reporters Louis Freedberg and Lance Williams, one of two reporters to uncover the Barry Bonds-[[BALCO scandal|BALCO steroid doping scandal]]. [[Los Angeles Times]] veteran Robert Salladay signed on as a senior editor, while multimedia guru Mark Luckie (of 10,000 Words fame) joined to produce content. Along with the Berkeley-based team, California Watch added a four-person team in Sacramento with hopes of opening a Los Angeles office. Former Philadelphia Inquirer executive editor Robert Rosenthal now serves as executive director for the Center for Investigative Reporting and offers development and administrative support for California Watch, along with others on the CIR staff.<ref name="Nieman"></ref>

The site aimed for up to a dozen updates each week day, including daily blog entries on its WatchBlog and Inside the Newsroom features. CIR gathered about $3.5 million in funding to start California Watch - enough for more than two years of operation at its $1.5 million annual budget. Major funding came from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation.<ref name="Nieman"></ref>

Katches said California Watch plans to develop a business model that combines continued philanthropic support with revenue from sponsorship, individual memberships, advertising and licensing.<ref name="Nieman"></ref> The site offers its content to California newspapers and media on a fee basis. Twenty-five state papers carried one of its first stories during the development period, all on the front page. California Watch partners with [[KQED]] in San Francisco for radio and TV distribution; with the [[Associated Press]] for distribution through its Exchange marketplace; and with [[New America Media]] for distribution of translated versions to ethnic media.<ref name="Nieman"></ref>

===Open Newsroom experiment===
While moving California Watch operations between offices in January 2010, reporters and editors were left without an office or Internet access for more than a week. To take advantage of a somewhat unfavorable situation, California Watch announced its first “Open Newsroom” project as “an opportunity for the public to stop by, share a cup of coffee and maybe give us some story ideas.”<ref name="CJR-open">Megan Garber. [http://www.cjr.org/the_news_frontier/california_watch_launches_open.php "California Watch Launches 'Open Newsroom' Project."] ''Columbia Journalism Review'', 27 Jan. 2010.</ref> Reporters fanned out around the Bay Area and across California to work in coffee shops with wireless Internet access. California Watch announced the plan - complete with a Google map detailing locations of each reporter's chosen coffee shop - on its Inside the Newsroom blog, as well as through Facebook and Twitter.<ref>Mark Katches. [http://www.californiawatch.org/watchblog/open-newsroom-bringing-our-team-wifi-spot-near-you "Open Newsroom: Bringing our team to a Wi-Fi spot near you."] ''California Watch'', 18 Jan. 2010.</ref>

The experiment had mixed results. Katches told the ''Columbia Journalism Review'', “It was a pretty uneventful day at our first Open Newsroom ... We don’t have, I don’t think, the type of connection with readers that is going to have long lines of people at the coffee shop coming to see us.”<ref name="CJR-open"></ref>

===Expansion===
Despite California Watch's small staff, the news outlet was called "one of the most watchable new journalism models in the country" and quickly gained legitimacy.<ref name="newsonomics">Ken Doctor. [http://newsonomics.com/3-reasons-to-watch-california-watch/ "Three reasons to watch California Watch."] ''Newsonomics'', 23 Mar. 2010.</ref> Knight-Ridder veteran Ken Doctor said the broad acceptance of California Watch by recognizable news brands conferred legitimacy on the startup, primarily because of the expertise California Watch reporters brought to the organization .<ref name="newsonomics"></ref>

This speedy acceptance as a news organization allowed California Watch to expand its reporting team to 11 members in June 2010, with the addition of Puliter Prize-winner [[Ryan Gabrielson]] as a public safety reporter; [[Nieman Fellowship|John S. Knight Fellow]] [[Susanne Rust]] on the environmental beat; and FairWarning-founding member Joanna Lin as an enterprise reporter focusing on public health.<ref>Jim Romenesko. [http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&aid=184385 "California Watch hires Pulitzer winner, finalist."] ''Poynter Online'', 1 June 2010.</ref> California Watch also hired Ashley Alvarado in July as public engagement manager to identify stories in neglected California communities and make sure the organization reaches those who need to know about its work – both affected parties and those who can make a difference. This brought the newsroom to 16 members. <ref>Mark Katches. [http://www.californiawatch.org/watchblog/california-watch-announces-new-public-engagement-manager "California Watch announces new public engagement manager."] ''California Watch'', 8 June 2010.</ref>


==Major Stories==
==Major Stories==

Revision as of 21:33, 28 July 2010

California Watch
Founded2009
FocusInvestigative Journalism
Location
MethodFoundation and member-supported
Key people
Robert Rosenthal, Executive Director of CIR
Mark Katches, Editorial Director
Christa Scharfenberg, Associate Director of CIR
Websitecaliforniawatch.org

California Watch is a nonpartisan and nonprofit investigative reporting group operated by the Center for Investigative Reporting. The news organization tracks a variety of statewide issues in California, including money and politics, the environment, health and welfare, public safety and education."

California Watch, which began operating in 2009, says its mission is to pursue “in-depth, high-impact reporting on issues such as education, public safety, health care and the environment” and produce “stories that hold those in power accountable, while tracking government waste and the misspending of taxpayer resources.”[1]

With offices in Berkeley and Sacramento, California Watch distributes its stories through local and regional news organizations, such as the San Francisco Chronicle, the Bay Area News Group, the Los Angeles News Group and the Sacramento Bee, as well as through online news websites, including the Huffington Post. It also publishes original news stories about California and databases about state and regional issues on a website, Californiawatch.org, and through social media such as Twitter and Facebook.

California Watch is supported by major grants from the James Irvine Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the California Endowment, and the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.[1]

History

Founding

California Watch officially launched January 4, 2010, after a soft-launch period and months of preparation. Editorial Director Mark Katches claims 85 reporters covered the California state house 10 years ago, while there are fewer than 25 today. He sees California Watch as filling a "big void in doing investigative work in California."[2] California Watch assembled the largest investigative team in the state with seven reporters, two multimedia producers and two editors to begin its news-gathering operation.[2]

Katches gathered a team with impressive resumes in investigative work, including longtime San Francisco Chronicle reporters Louis Freedberg and Lance Williams, one of two reporters to uncover the Barry Bonds-BALCO steroid doping scandal. Los Angeles Times veteran Robert Salladay signed on as a senior editor, while multimedia guru Mark Luckie (of 10,000 Words fame) joined to produce content. Along with the Berkeley-based team, California Watch added a four-person team in Sacramento with hopes of opening a Los Angeles office. Former Philadelphia Inquirer executive editor Robert Rosenthal now serves as executive director for the Center for Investigative Reporting and offers development and administrative support for California Watch, along with others on the CIR staff.[2]

The site aimed for up to a dozen updates each week day, including daily blog entries on its WatchBlog and Inside the Newsroom features. CIR gathered about $3.5 million in funding to start California Watch - enough for more than two years of operation at its $1.5 million annual budget. Major funding came from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the James Irvine Foundation.[2]

Katches said California Watch plans to develop a business model that combines continued philanthropic support with revenue from sponsorship, individual memberships, advertising and licensing.[2] The site offers its content to California newspapers and media on a fee basis. Twenty-five state papers carried one of its first stories during the development period, all on the front page. California Watch partners with KQED in San Francisco for radio and TV distribution; with the Associated Press for distribution through its Exchange marketplace; and with New America Media for distribution of translated versions to ethnic media.[2]

Open Newsroom experiment

While moving California Watch operations between offices in January 2010, reporters and editors were left without an office or Internet access for more than a week. To take advantage of a somewhat unfavorable situation, California Watch announced its first “Open Newsroom” project as “an opportunity for the public to stop by, share a cup of coffee and maybe give us some story ideas.”[3] Reporters fanned out around the Bay Area and across California to work in coffee shops with wireless Internet access. California Watch announced the plan - complete with a Google map detailing locations of each reporter's chosen coffee shop - on its Inside the Newsroom blog, as well as through Facebook and Twitter.[4]

The experiment had mixed results. Katches told the Columbia Journalism Review, “It was a pretty uneventful day at our first Open Newsroom ... We don’t have, I don’t think, the type of connection with readers that is going to have long lines of people at the coffee shop coming to see us.”[3]

Expansion

Despite California Watch's small staff, the news outlet was called "one of the most watchable new journalism models in the country" and quickly gained legitimacy.[5] Knight-Ridder veteran Ken Doctor said the broad acceptance of California Watch by recognizable news brands conferred legitimacy on the startup, primarily because of the expertise California Watch reporters brought to the organization .[5]

This speedy acceptance as a news organization allowed California Watch to expand its reporting team to 11 members in June 2010, with the addition of Puliter Prize-winner Ryan Gabrielson as a public safety reporter; John S. Knight Fellow Susanne Rust on the environmental beat; and FairWarning-founding member Joanna Lin as an enterprise reporter focusing on public health.[6] California Watch also hired Ashley Alvarado in July as public engagement manager to identify stories in neglected California communities and make sure the organization reaches those who need to know about its work – both affected parties and those who can make a difference. This brought the newsroom to 16 members. [7]

Major Stories

Dubious Homeland Security spending

California Watch's first foray into a new model for journalism was a story on wasteful homeland security spending, purchasing violations, error-prone accounting and shoddy oversight throughout California during the years immediately after 9/11. [8]

CIR homeland security reporter G.W. Schulz examined thousands of pages of documents from 160 state homeland security monitoring reports. California Watch found more than $15 million in questionable costs, such as communities buying large-screen televisions with anti-terrorism funds; not using software or hardware purchases; failing to keep adequate records that lead to overpayment or loss of equipment; and not seeking competitive bids when buying both large and small-ticket items.[8]

California Watch released the article Sept. 11, 2009. The story got picked up by more than two dozen news outlets including California's top newspapers, reaching almost 2 million readers in print and many more online.[9]

Seismic safety

In mid-March 2010, California Watch published a report by higher education reporter Erica Perez investigating how California’s public universities are slow to fix buildings deemed significant seismic hazards. The story broadcast on television and radio stations throughout California and appeared in newspapers and online websites. A college student newspaper published the story as well (the Daily 49er at California State University Long Beach).[10]

California Watch supplied the story to news partners a week before publication to localize the story for their audiences. The San Francisco Chronicle published a lengthy version, while The Bakersfield Californian, The Eureka Times Standard, the Long Beach Press Telegram and Orange County Register included condensed versions in their publications.[11]

Hetch Hetchy Power Crew

Five highly-paid electricians working for the city of San Francisco spent years allegedly stealing from taxpayers by throwing sex parties with prostitutes, moonlighting on city time and fraudulently billing the city to pay for suburban lifestyles, according to a California Watch report by money and politics reporter Lance Williams and freelancer Stephanie Rice. [12]

Williams hosted an online question-and-answer session July 8, 2010, to answer reader questions about the investigation. He revealed the electricians were caught because of an anonymous tip to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission that accused alleged ringleader Donnie Thomas of running a business on city time. Williams also said the city attorney’s office of San Francisco hired private investigators, who installed surveillance cameras around the offices on San Francisco Bay's Treasure Island to record the electricians' activities and compare with their time card punches. [13]

The San Francisco Chronicle featured the California Watch report in a front-page article July 4, 2010, while KGO TV, KQED public radio, and KCBS radio also covered the story. [14]

Shrinking school years

Education reporter Louis Freedberg investigated the effect California's budget crisis is having on public education in the state, finding that 16 of California's 30 largest school districts were opting to reduce the number of days in the academic year - a change affecting some 1.4 million students.[15]

Freedberg's report found that educators believe shrinking school years and other budget cutbacks could "depress hard-won academic gains in recent years," while some saw it as proof California's budget crisis is starting to erode "the core of public education in California."[15]

California Watch released the story July 15, 2010, and it was was widely covered in radio, television and newspaper accounts, including Spanish-language media such as La Opinión.[15]

References

  1. ^ a b "About Us page." California Watch, accessed 26 July 2010.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Martin Langeveld. "California Watch: The latest entrant in the dot-org journalism boom." Nieman Journalism Lab, 5 Jan. 2010.
  3. ^ a b Megan Garber. "California Watch Launches 'Open Newsroom' Project." Columbia Journalism Review, 27 Jan. 2010.
  4. ^ Mark Katches. "Open Newsroom: Bringing our team to a Wi-Fi spot near you." California Watch, 18 Jan. 2010.
  5. ^ a b Ken Doctor. "Three reasons to watch California Watch." Newsonomics, 23 Mar. 2010.
  6. ^ Jim Romenesko. "California Watch hires Pulitzer winner, finalist." Poynter Online, 1 June 2010.
  7. ^ Mark Katches. "California Watch announces new public engagement manager." California Watch, 8 June 2010.
  8. ^ a b G.W. Schulz. "Homeland Security marked by waste, lack of oversight." California Watch, 11 Sept. 2009.
  9. ^ Ken Doctor. "Bay Area Online News Renaissance: 7 Pointers Forward." Content Bridges, 27 Sept. 2009.
  10. ^ Erica Perez. "Six CSULB buildings seismically unsafe." The Daily 49er, Long Beach, Calif., 21 March 2010.
  11. ^ Robert Rosenthal. "California Watch reaches new partners with seismic story." California Watch, 22 March 2010.
  12. ^ Lance Williams and Stephanie Rice. "Unsupervised city workers accused of brazen theft, cheating taxpayers." California Watch, 2 July 2010.
  13. ^ Lance Williams. "Q & A: Lance Williams on the Treasure Island power crew." California Watch, 9 July 2010.
  14. ^ Ken Miguel. "City workers accused of outrageous spending." KGO TV, 2 July 2010.
  15. ^ a b c Louis Freedberg. "Majority of state's largest districts shrink school calendar amid budget crisis." California Watch, 15 July 2010.