Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Buzzhorn: Difference between revisions
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Bands and musicians |
The Buzzhorn (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Weak delete''', though "with quotes from Hit Parader magazine labeling The Buzzhorn as "the new hard rock rookies of the year" as well as a 4 star review from metal edge magazine." suggest that multiple reliable independent sources have reviewed their album in detail? [[User:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] ([[User talk:Kimchi.sg|talk]]) 13:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC) |
*'''Weak delete''', though "with quotes from Hit Parader magazine labeling The Buzzhorn as "the new hard rock rookies of the year" as well as a 4 star review from metal edge magazine." suggest that multiple reliable independent sources have reviewed their album in detail? [[User:Kimchi.sg|Kimchi.sg]] ([[User talk:Kimchi.sg|talk]]) 13:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
I do not understand only one thing: this page firstly appeared at 18:48, 17 April 2007 and existed without being considered to be removed up to the 4th of August. But after a little expenditure of this article it's became a close candidate for deletion. Why? If there are some information that is not suitable to be notable, I can removed it. I don't think this page needs to be deleted, so much information, for example I can only learn from here, as this band was not so notable at all and there is no so much information in the Internet. |
|||
Thanks. |
|||
Revision as of 19:45, 5 August 2010
The Buzzhorn
- The Buzzhorn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- Disconnected (The Buzzhorn album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This band releaed one album on a major label and featured on the soundtrack of Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2, although neither of these things are enough in itself to make the band notable. The band did not sell many records and the article gives no other suggestion that they meet WP:BAND, although they are close. Rje (talk) 12:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
This article has no need in deleting because of the information that is credibly indicates the importance about this musicians. Additional information about previous albums has been added, the source of this information is fully tested (http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:gvfqxqtkldke) for providing useful information. However, this page considered to be appropriate as minor changes has been added. No new external links were added too, only the official site which is taken down. Please, keep this page from being deleted, I just want to have it more expended. Thanks.—Preceding unsigned comment added by The Buzzhorn (talk • contribs) 12:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence at all of notability. No independent sources, and even the link to the band's own site no longer links there. (I have therefore removed it.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I've restored their sole non-independent album Disconnected for consideration in this AfD too. It should be kept/deleted along with the band's article. Kimchi.sg (talk) 13:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Weak delete, though "with quotes from Hit Parader magazine labeling The Buzzhorn as "the new hard rock rookies of the year" as well as a 4 star review from metal edge magazine." suggest that multiple reliable independent sources have reviewed their album in detail? Kimchi.sg (talk) 13:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I do not understand only one thing: this page firstly appeared at 18:48, 17 April 2007 and existed without being considered to be removed up to the 4th of August. But after a little expenditure of this article it's became a close candidate for deletion. Why? If there are some information that is not suitable to be notable, I can removed it. I don't think this page needs to be deleted, so much information, for example I can only learn from here, as this band was not so notable at all and there is no so much information in the Internet. Thanks.