User talk:Teflon Peter Christ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:21, 9 August 2010

Edits to Ready

You pointed out that "There is nothing in WP:Albums policy about there having to be a link/url to the review; The template page says only add a link if available." But you can't add unsourced information to a Wikipedia article per Wikipedia:Verifiability. If there is no stable link, than anything can be added for the review. Also when the article is nominated for GA, it cannot pass with dead links. Candyo32 (talk) 13:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can removing the review be ridiculous if its not sourced. The only part of the RS review that can be included in the article per WP:Verifiability is what is included from the review on Metacritic. But parts of the review, not in the side cannot because the original link is dead. Candyo32 (talk) 13:59, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I meant "not on the site." Candyo32 (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

& by "parts of the review" I mean the portion of the review included on Metacritic. Candyo32 (talk) 14:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's alright as Metacritic is cited as the source of the RS review. In the past edits the dead linked RS article was cited. Candyo32 (talk) 18:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gearslutz

Please dont revert my edit to the Roots article. Gearslutz was declared *non-notable* a few days ago. Ima only following procedures. Jrod2 (talk) 13:04, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Dan. Im sorry but i had deleted that reference at Voodoo's again. Wait for Cavalry's opinion before u decide to revert me again. Thx. Jrod2 (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dan, I got no beef with ya, but using the word "dick" is considered a personal attack on these parts and I could've got you a warning tag right there, know what i am sayin??. Chill out Bro, some of us are just doing what we think is right. Jrod2 (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Dan, looks like 'Chase me' is too busy with OTRS stuff to give a proper answer....I ain't gonna be waiting around for you to "ask around" and you never do. I did ask another fellow admin an happened to have COI issues with the same article, so can't intervene. You need to show me why ya believe this citation and its reference source needs to be included in the article, not the other way around. Im the one deleting (editing out). Find a passage in our Wiki guidelines that supports your conviction. I recommend you reading this first and before you make hasty decisions:

"Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material."

This means that the information you wanna keep on that Voodoo article about this engineer "Elevado" MIGHT be considered for inclusion on his own biography article. I say it might 'cause Gearslutz is not considered a reliable source (Web Forum). Like I said, if it ain't sourced from a major publication, then WP dont need that. Jrod2 (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roland Jupiter

The article Roland Jupiter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article fails at notability and is prohibited under wp:not.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. My76 Strat 16:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

XXL review of Thank Me Later

XXL reviewed Drakes Thank Me Later album with an XL grade. Which reviewer should be removed to place this one in? Red Flag on the Right Side 04:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Lucious Left Foot: The Son of Chico Dusty

Hi.

I assessed it a B, but lacks performance personnel, it only has production personnel; that`s the only thing. Zidane tribal (talk) 16:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Am... Sasha Fierce

Can you please help me to fix the track listing for the Platinum Edition? It consists of two parts: I Am... Sasha Fierce and DVD video collection. Jivesh boodhun (talk) 21:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dance music

Granted.. I accept that in this case when speaking of Fleshtone dance music refers to Electronic Dance Music whereas when speaking about Gaga its Dance - pop. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-Published Sources

As I mentioned, WP:SPS says that self-published sources cannot be used as sources for information regarding living people. If you disagree, you could bring this up at WT:V where the editors will be much more knowledgeable as to whether you can use the source or not. --JD554 (talk) 09:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...

...must have hit Rollback unintentionally with the mouse. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 50: / Line 50: @@
 As I mentioned, [[WP:SPS]] says that self-published sources cannot be used as sources for information regarding living people. If you disagree, you could bring this up at [[WT:V]] where the editors will be much more knowledgeable as to whether you can use the source or not. --[[User:JD554|JD554]] ([[User talk:JD554|talk]]) 09:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
+== Sorry... ==
+...must have hit Rollback unintentionally with the mouse. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)