Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuremberg Trials-Sons of Haman Coincidence?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Nuremberg Trials-Sons of Haman Coincidence?}}) |
:({{Find sources|Nuremberg Trials-Sons of Haman Coincidence?}}) |
||
Contested PROD. This piece of wisdom is well known in Jewish circles, but it does not deserve its own Wikipedia article for notability reasons. The current article is a piece of original research that doesn't even credit the rabbinical authors that uncovered the "[5]707" link (it has been traced both to the Rebbe of Vizhnitz and to Rabbi Michael Ber Weissmandl). [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 19:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
Contested PROD. This piece of wisdom is well known in Jewish circles, but it does not deserve its own Wikipedia article for notability reasons. The current article is a piece of original research that doesn't even credit the rabbinical authors that uncovered the "[5]707" link (it has been traced both to the Rebbe of Vizhnitz and to Rabbi Michael Ber Weissmandl). [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 19:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
::As for Original Reasearch- I disagree. All the factual claims in the article are fully referenced by reliable secondary sources. |
|||
As for notability- I wish to point that other claims of coincidence/precognition etc. are mentioned in wikipedia and some even got their own article in wikipedia, see e.g. [[Lincoln-Kennedy coincidences urban legend]], [[Bible Code]], [[Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan]]. Also see [[R v Dudley and Stephens#Cultural Impact]]. |
|||
As for the rabbinical authors that uncovered the link- I'd be happy to credit them if you have citations for these. |
|||
Revision as of 20:13, 15 August 2010
- Nuremberg Trials-Sons of Haman Coincidence? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. This piece of wisdom is well known in Jewish circles, but it does not deserve its own Wikipedia article for notability reasons. The current article is a piece of original research that doesn't even credit the rabbinical authors that uncovered the "[5]707" link (it has been traced both to the Rebbe of Vizhnitz and to Rabbi Michael Ber Weissmandl). JFW | T@lk 19:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- As for Original Reasearch- I disagree. All the factual claims in the article are fully referenced by reliable secondary sources.
As for notability- I wish to point that other claims of coincidence/precognition etc. are mentioned in wikipedia and some even got their own article in wikipedia, see e.g. Lincoln-Kennedy coincidences urban legend, Bible Code, Futility, or the Wreck of the Titan. Also see R v Dudley and Stephens#Cultural Impact. As for the rabbinical authors that uncovered the link- I'd be happy to credit them if you have citations for these.