User talk:82.1.127.95: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:40, 29 August 2010

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Erika (song) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pmlin editor 16:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Part (haircut). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Wperdue (talk) 01:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copyright warning

Your addition to Men of Harlech has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cyclopaedic (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page BioShock (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gage (talk) 20:49, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page BioShock (series). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gage (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to BioShock (series). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Bart133 ^{t c @} 20:51, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Characters in BioShock

Why are they worthy of inclusion? Because they have importance to the plot? I'm afraid that importance to a fictional world does not transfer to being important to the real world. And without that importance to the real world, what purpose is there to putting them on this list? If you want to indiscriminately discuss this topic, do it on a Wikia, where there are likely to be very little in the way of things to prevent such discussion. However, Wikipedia takes a firm stance on excessive plot summary such as this - where they could be the most irrelevant characters to basically everyone on Earth, but because they are major characters in a game, this makes them exceptional to the rule. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 11:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A good point well made. (11:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC))

Revision as of 11:13, 29 August 2010 edit Abryn (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers 51,094 edits →‎Characters in BioShock: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:40, 29 August 2010 edit undo 82.1.127.95 (talk) →‎Characters in BioShock Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Why are they worthy of inclusion? Because they have importance to the plot? I'm afraid that importance to a fictional world does not transfer to being important to the real world. And without that importance to the real world, what purpose is there to putting them on this list? If you want to indiscriminately discuss this topic, do it on a Wikia, where there are likely to be very little in the way of things to prevent such discussion. However, Wikipedia takes a firm stance on excessive plot summary such as this - where they could be the most irrelevant characters to basically everyone on Earth, but because they are major characters in a game, this makes them exceptional to the rule. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie\|The New Age Retro Hippie]] [[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie\|used Ruler!]] [[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie\|Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.]] 11:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)		Why are they worthy of inclusion? Because they have importance to the plot? I'm afraid that importance to a fictional world does not transfer to being important to the real world. And without that importance to the real world, what purpose is there to putting them on this list? If you want to indiscriminately discuss this topic, do it on a Wikia, where there are likely to be very little in the way of things to prevent such discussion. However, Wikipedia takes a firm stance on excessive plot summary such as this - where they could be the most irrelevant characters to basically everyone on Earth, but because they are major characters in a game, this makes them exceptional to the rule. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie\|The New Age Retro Hippie]] [[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie\|used Ruler!]] [[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie\|Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.]] 11:13, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

			:A good point well made. (11:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC))