Jump to content

User talk:Forever Dusk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 29: Line 29:
== your reversion of my edit at [[Numbers game]] ==
== your reversion of my edit at [[Numbers game]] ==


I am restoring validly sourced information per the talk page. I have filled a false-positive report with the bot. Are you saying that I cannot make this edit as an IP? [[Special:Contributions/68.55.212.251|68.55.212.251]] ([[User talk:68.55.212.251|talk]]) 19:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I am restoring validly sourced information per the talk page. I have filed a false-positive report with the bot. Are you saying that I cannot make this edit as an IP? [[Special:Contributions/68.55.212.251|68.55.212.251]] ([[User talk:68.55.212.251|talk]]) 19:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:32, 25 September 2010

Please don't delete DJ Joon, i have entered everything correctly can you please tell, whats wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.126.103 (talk) 01:51, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

how come i can remove information from John Patrick Acquaviva wikipedia page and it gets left like that but not from the other one?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.25.212.129 (talk) 23:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed permission

I've granted you confirmed status. You seem to know already, but that allows you to edit semi-protected pages, move pages and do a few other things that we restrict to confirmed and autoconfirmed accounts to prevent abuse. Have a look at WP:CONFIRMED for more and let me know if yo need anything. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On further examination, you know exactly what you're doing! I've removed rollback and reviewer from your old account since it's no longer being used and I've added them to this account, so your permissions should be the same as they were. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Vandalism

Oh hello there :) You left a message on my talk page - is it possible for you to post the link to the actual revision so I can see if it was a mistake or not? Thanks! :) --Addihockey10 04:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haha :) Don't worry about it mate - keep up the good work on the wiki! :) --Addihockey10 04:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, my recent edit was backed up with a proper edit summary, which didn't seem to stop you reverting it with a sanctimonious message about leaving an edit summary. 98.192.175.221 (talk) 04:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your reversion of my edit at Numbers game

I am restoring validly sourced information per the talk page. I have filed a false-positive report with the bot. Are you saying that I cannot make this edit as an IP? 68.55.212.251 (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]