User talk:HJ Mitchell

Hello and welcome to my talk page! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you; if I don't, I'll find out (or one of my talk-page stalkers might know!), then we'll both have learnt something!

Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious.

A list of archives of this talk page is here. Those in Roman numerals come first chronologically

This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.

Nomination of Old Wolverton Road Bridge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old Wolverton Road Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Wolverton Road Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. About me; Talk to me. Farewell fellow editor... 00:29, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 'airport vandal' is back: requesting second rangeblock for 5.55.0.0/16

Hi HJ Mitchell,

Last year in November you blocked the IP range 5.55.0.0/16 for one year, due to persistent disruption mostly on airport-related articles. This IP user is dubbed the 'airport vandal' by an editor that regularly deals with edits from this pest.

Fast forward to today, the one-year-long /16 rangeblock has now expired, and unfortunately it appears this same person is back to making the same kind of disruption to airport-related articles again, right after the block expiration, e.g. diff 1, diff 2, diff 3. I think it needs another rangeblock.

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AP 499D25 that's some remarkable persistence! I've put a longer block on the range. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen worse but yeah, 1 year, that's quite some dedication! Anyways thanks, and I'm sure @The Banner (the user constantly dealing with this LTA's edits) appreciates it too! — AP 499D25 (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concern. An AIV-report for this and a second range went stale, so I resubmitted it. To be true, as far as I can see things have quieted down a bit. I guess 5.55 is their home connection so the block has been inconvenient (what we intend). The Banner talk 13:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, HJ Mitchell. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you block this sock IP?

Hi HJ Mitchell, I'm posting this here because you came up as a recently active administrator. If you have the time, could you please block the IP range 2405:4803:C7A6:2D20:E862:FF5:0:0/64, as they are an obvious sock of MYSKaoi and 2012An(4thwm1), who was recently blocked here? Happily888 (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Happily888 Blocked for a week. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Happily888 (talk) 12:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just gotta say

Your byline musing is getting absolutely savaged. I almost feel like that was a plant to give people an easy option and to show they read your musings column. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I probably should have seen that coming. But the musings aren't there because everyone will agree with them (if that were the case they'd just be policy!) and I'm much more interested in how people make their case and defend it than in whether they agree with me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of expected more people to foam at the mouth at the characterisation of ArbCom as a governing body... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:29, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, maybe people won't consider them a governing body when they can't cut entire topics off from non-EC editors, make new rules out of whole cloth, and place irreversible no-public-reason blocks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the irreversible blocks are possibly one of the least controversial things we do—they're rare (I think the number we've done this year can be counted on one hand) and generally people understand that there's a very good reason for it but we can't tell them what it is. And I think most people are glad they don't have to make those sorts of decisions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Dear Mr Mitchell,

I don't know you and I'm pretty sure you don't know me.

I have never edited Wikipedia in my life yet I see that you have blocked me. If this is true, and I suppose it must be, can you explain your action? I am nonplussed. I'm not used to this method of communication and I can't give you an email address, so unsure how I can read your reply.

Yours sincerely,

John Clinch Johnclinch (talk) 15:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnclinch That you managed to post this is evidence that your account is not blocked. My guess is that you share a connection with someone else who has caused us problems. As long as you're logged in, most blocks won't affect you. Even if you do see a block message, you can still read Wikipedia as blocks only apply to editing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harry, the CU log shows Jpgordon looked into this a little while ago. Drmies (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's exactly an anon block that OP complained about. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what exactly is a "community" position?

I don't necessarily disagree with your edit, but I think the intent was that admins and BAG memebers are selected by the community, whereas membership for non-arbs on the fucntionaries team is entirely under the control of the committee. That's my read anyway. I agree the term is at best undefined. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 00:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Just Step Sideways I think I see what it was getting at but it didn't define the term, as you say, and it implied that functionaries belonged to a second, unspecified group. The important distinction is that functionaries are bound by the ANPDP and their roles involve private information. I think the old version could also have been read that functionaries are somehow superior to admins/'crats/BAG (not sure why the last one is relevant?) when in fact we all take on the roles that interest us. Always good to hear from you. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diddy

HJ, does Dark1618 = P.diddysucks? I already noticed that Dark1618 was a strange new user, but hadn't seen anything so disruptive until their last edit to Talk:Sean Combs, which was preceded just a couple days ago by a similar edit by P.diddysucks (P.diddysucks's edits were much worse and their username is a red flag). FWIW, the two users also edit on the same mobile platform.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 magic 8-ball says no. Different continents. I suppose it's to be expected with subjects who are in the news. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, HJ. I took the liberty of correcting my typos in my original post.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On AfD

Coming from the ACE discussions of your musings, although I am not running for ArbCom, I'll say that I do not think AfDs are votes. Sometimes, they can seem like one, with editors coming down hard on either the delete or keep sides, but those are rare. Often, I see several editors proposing different solutions (delete, redirect, merge, keep, and many others), or debating the finer points of sourcing and notability guidelines, and the AfD really is a discussion. Those are the best AfDs. But they're probably also a pain for closers, since there isn't always a "majority" in favor of one solution. The only reason I add a bolded "vote" before my comments at all is to help the closer skim the discussion.

RfAs, on the other hand, are votes. Toadspike [Talk] 15:56, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

News and notes: Open letter to WMF about court case breaks one thousand signatures, big arb case declined, U4C begins accepting cases

In the media: Summons issued for Wikipedia editors by Indian court, "Gaza genocide" RfC close in news, old admin Gwern now big AI guy, and a "spectrum of reluctance" over Australian place names

Recent research: SPINACH: AI help for asking Wikidata "challenging real-world questions"

News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment audit reports: FY 2023–2024

Traffic report: Well, let us share with you our knowledge, about the electoral college

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ip vandal

Hello, i assume you struck two BLP violation edits that 69.11.41.241 made. There is a third edit [1] that is basically the same as the two struck ones—blindlynx 23:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Blindlynx thanks, that one's gone as well now. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!—blindlynx 01:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]