Talk:786 (number): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:57, 8 February 2006

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 November 2005. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Well, it's still non-notable as a number -- that's one notable property as a number (sphenic, and being in a not-particularly-notable number sequence are not notable), no notable properties in Astronomy, and one interesting property in islam, which probably should be a separate article pointed to by the 700 article. (In fact, it is as Basmala#Numerology.) But the article is still going to stay, anyway, so I won't bother with it, other than fixing the mathematical category. Arthur Rubin

Yes, that was me, about a week ago. Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{oldafdfull
-{| class="Talk-Notice"
+| date = 3 November 2005
-|-
+| result = speedy keep
-|[[Image:Evolution-tasks.png|45px|Articles for deletion]]
+| votepage = {{PAGENAME}}
-| style="text-align: center" |
+}}
-This article was nominated for '''''[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]''''' on 3 November 2005.
-The result of the discussion was ''speedy keep''. <!-- please do not add bolding to ''speedy keep'' here: this breaks many places where it is already specified -->
-An archived record of this discussion can be found [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/786 (number)|here]].
-|}
 Well, it's still non-notable as a number -- that's '''one''' notable property as a number (sphenic, and being in a not-particularly-notable number sequence are not notable), '''no''' notable properties in Astronomy, and '''one''' interesting property in islam, which probably should be a separate article pointed to by the [[700 (number)|700]] article.  (In fact, it ''is'' as [[Basmala#Numerology]].)  But the article is still going to stay, anyway, so I won't bother with it, other than fixing the mathematical category. <font color=red>[[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]]</font>