Jump to content

Maksutov telescope: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m WP:CHECKWIKI error 10 + genfixes using AWB (7140)
Line 42: Line 42:


===Maksutov newtonians===
===Maksutov newtonians===
Maksutovs optics can be used in [[Newtonian telescope|newtonian]] configurations that have minimal aberration over a wide [[field of view]] with one forth of the coma of a similar standard Newtonian and half the coma of a [[Schmidt–Newton telescope|Schmidt-Newtonian]].<ref>[[http://books.google.com/books?id=x3LvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&dq=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&hl=en&ei=kRQHTNmoBoP48AbRvZCSDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ Harrie G. J. Rutten, Martin A. M. van Venrooij, Telescope optics: evaluation and design - 374 pages</ref> Defraction can also minimized by using a high [[focal ratio]] with a proportionally small diagonal mirror mounted on the corrector, allowing this design to present contrast and image quality approaching that of un-obstructed high end refractors (although with some [[vignetting]] when used photographicaly).<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=kszsAxOHym0C&pg=PA101&dq=Maksutov+newtonian&cd=5#v=onepage&q=Maksutov%20newtonian&f=false Rod Mollise, Choosing and Using a New CAT, page 101]</ref> Like the Maksutov–Cassegrain, the size of the instrument is limited due to the mass of the corrector plate.
Maksutovs optics can be used in [[Newtonian telescope|newtonian]] configurations that have minimal aberration over a wide [[field of view]] with one fourth of the coma of a similar standard Newtonian and half the coma of a [[Schmidt–Newton telescope|Schmidt-Newtonian]].<ref>[[http://books.google.com/books?id=x3LvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&dq=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&hl=en&ei=kRQHTNmoBoP48AbRvZCSDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ Harrie G. J. Rutten, Martin A. M. van Venrooij, Telescope optics: evaluation and design - 374 pages</ref> Diffraction can also minimized by using a high [[focal ratio]] with a proportionally small diagonal mirror mounted on the corrector, allowing this design to present contrast and image quality approaching that of unobstructed high end refractors (although with some [[vignetting]] when used photographicaly).<ref>[http://books.google.com/books?id=kszsAxOHym0C&pg=PA101&dq=Maksutov+newtonian&cd=5#v=onepage&q=Maksutov%20newtonian&f=false Rod Mollise, Choosing and Using a New CAT, page 101]</ref> Like the Maksutov–Cassegrain, the size of the instrument is limited due to the mass of the corrector plate.


===Maksutov cameras===
===Maksutov cameras===

Revision as of 04:24, 27 September 2010

A 150mm aperture Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope.

The Maksutov is a catadioptric telescope design that combines a spherical mirror with a weakly negative meniscus lens in a design that takes advantage of all the surfaces being nearly "spherically symmetrical".[1] The negative lens is usually full diameter and placed at the entrance pupil of the telescope (commonly called a "corrector plate" or "meniscus corrector shell"). The design corrects the problems of off-axis aberrations such as coma found in reflecting telescopes while also correcting chromatic aberration. It was patented in 1941 by Russian optician Dmitri Dmitrievich Maksutov.[2][3] Maksutov based his design on the idea behind the Schmidt camera of using the spherical errors of a negative lens to correct the opposite errors in a spherical primary mirror. The design is most commonly seen in a Cassegrain variation, with an integrated secondary, that can use all-spherical elements, thereby simplifying fabrication. Maksutov telescopes have been sold on the amateur market since the 1950s.

Invention

Dmitri Maksutov may have been working with the idea of pairing a spherical primary mirror in conjunction with a negative meniscus lens as far back as 1936. His notes from that time on the function of Mangin mirrors, an early catadioptric spotlight reflector consisting of negative lens with silvering on the back side, include a sketch of Mangin mirror with the mirror part and the negative lens separated into two elements.[4] Maksutov seems to have picked up the idea again in 1941 war torn Europe as a variation on an earlier design that paired a spherical mirror with a negative lens, Bernhard Schmidt's 1931 "Schmidt Camera".[2][3] Maksutov claimed to have come up with the idea of replacing the complex Schmidt corrector plate with an all spherical "meniscus corrector plate" while riding in in a train of refugees from Leningrad.[5]. Maksutov is described as patenting his design in May [5], August, or October 1941[6] and building a "Maksutov–Gregorian" style proto-type in October 1941[6]. Maksutov came up with the unique idea using an "achromatic corrector", a corrector made of a single type of glass with a weak negative meniscus shape that departed from the pure concentric spherical symmetrical shape to correct chromatic aberration.[7]

Similar independent meniscus telescope designs were also patented in 1941 Albert Bouwers (his 1941 concentric meniscus telescope), K. Penning[8] and Dennis Gabor (a catadioptric non-monocentric design).[9] Wartime secrecy kept these inventors from knowing about each others' designs, leading to each being an independent invention.

Derivative designs

Maksutov's design for a meniscus telescope was the first to be published,[10] appearing in the Journal of the Optical Society of America Vol. 34, No. 5. in May 1944 in a paper written by Maksutov entitled New Catadioptric Meniscus Systems.[6] This led to professional and amateur designers almost immediately experiment with variations including newtonian, Cassegrain, and wide field camera designs.

Maksutov–Cassegrains

There are many maksutov designs that use a cassegrain configuration, mounting a convex secondary mirror near the focus of the primary mirror. Most types use full aperture correctors and are therefore not very large since the corrector plate rapidly becomes prohibitively large, heavy and expensive as the aperture increases, with very long cool-down times to reach optimal optical performance. Most commercial manufacturers usually stop at 180 mm (7 inches).

Gregory or "Spot" maksutov-cassegrains

Light path in a typical "Gregory" or "spot" Maksutov–Cassegrain.

Maksutov's design notes from 1941 explored the possibility of a 'folded' Cassegrain-type construction with a secondary silvered "spot" on the convex side of the meniscus facing the primary mirror.[6] He thought this would create a sealed and rugged optical system suitable for use in schools[6]. This design appeared commercially in Lawrence Braymer's 1954 Questar telescope and in Perkin–Elmer designer John Gregory's competing patent for a Maksutov–Cassegrain. Commercial use of Gregory's design was explicitly reserved for Perkin–Elmer but was published as an amateur telescope design in a 1957 issue of Sky and Telescope in a f/15 and f/23 variation. Most Maksutovs manufactured today are this type of 'Cassegrain' design (called either a "Gregory–Maksutov"[11] or "Spot-Maksutov") that use all spherical surfaces and has, as secondary, a small aluminized spot on the inner face of the corrector. This has the advantage of simplifying construction. It also has the advantage of fixing the alignment of the secondary and eliminates the need for a 'spider' that would cause diffraction spikes. The disadvantage is that, if all spherical surfaces are used, such systems have to have focal ratios above f/15 to avoid aberrations[12]. Also a degree of freedom in correcting the optical system by changing the radius of curvature of the secondary is lost since that radius is the same as that of the rear meniscus face. Gregory himself, in a second, faster (f/15) design resorted to aspherization of the front corrector surface (or the primary mirror) in order to reduce aberrations. This has led to other designs with aspheric or additional elements to further reduce off-axis aberration.[13] This type of Maksutov Cassegrain's high focal ratio and narrower field of view makes them more suitable for lunar and planetary imaging and any other type of observing where a narrow field high power view is a plus, such a resolving tightly packed globular clusters and double stars.

Meade ETX "spot" Maksutov–Cassegrain.

The most notable early amateur astronomical type was the Questar 3-1/2 Maksutov Cassegrain introduced in 1954, a small run expensive model still available on the consumer market. The mid-70s saw the introduction of mass-produced models by some of the major commercial manufacturers. More recently low-cost Russian and, lately, Chinese mass-production have pushed the prices down even farther. Many manufacturers currently produce Maksutov–Cassegrains such as Explore Scientific, Intes, and Intes-Micro, LOMO, Synta Technology Corp, Orion Optics, Telescope Engineering Company (TEC), Vixen, Celestron's C90 and C130 lines, and Meade Instruments's ETX line.

The spot Maksutov–Cassegrain design has been used extensively in military, industrial, and aerospace applications. Since all of the optical elements can be permanently fixed in alignment and the tube assembly can be environmentally sealed the design is extremely rugged. That makes them ideal for tracking, remote viewing, and radar calibration/boresighting where instruments are subjected to severe environments and high g-forces.

Rutten Maksutov-cassegrains

Light path in a typical Rutten Maksutov–Cassegrain.

The Rutten Maksutov–Cassegrain (also called a Rumak or Sigler Maksutov)[14] has a separate secondary mirror mounted on back of the meniscus corrector, sometimes similar to the corrector/mirror holder configurations found in commercial Schmidt–Cassegrains. This provides extra degree of freedom in correcting aberration by changing the curvature of the corrector and the secondary independently. Specifically it allows the designer to ashperize the secondary to provide a much wider flat field than traditional spot maksutovs with less off-axis coma. Mounting the secondary on the corrector also limits diffraction spikes. This version is named after the work of Dutch optical designer Harrie Rutten.

Sub-aperture corrector Maksutov-cassegrains

Light path in a typical sub-aperture Maksutov–Cassegrain.

Maksutov noted in his designs that instead of using full aperture corrector, a small sub-aperture corrector could be placed in the converging light cone of the primary mirror and achieve the same effect.[15] In the 1980s Dave Shafer[15] and Ralph W. Field[16] came out with sub-aperture Cassegrain designs based on this idea. The design saves on the mass and "cool-down time" of a full aperture corrector. It has the drawbacks of no longer have a sealed tube and needs a spider to hold the sedondary mirror and corrector, which inevitably affects image quality through diffraction artifacts. Also since the light passes through the corrector twice, the number of surfaces involved is multiplied, making it difficult to achieve good aberration correction.[17][18] Sub-aperture corrector Maksutovs are currently manufactured by Vixen telescopes, their VMC (Vixen Maksutov Cassegrain) models.

Maksutov newtonians

Maksutovs optics can be used in newtonian configurations that have minimal aberration over a wide field of view with one fourth of the coma of a similar standard Newtonian and half the coma of a Schmidt-Newtonian.[19] Diffraction can also minimized by using a high focal ratio with a proportionally small diagonal mirror mounted on the corrector, allowing this design to present contrast and image quality approaching that of unobstructed high end refractors (although with some vignetting when used photographicaly).[20] Like the Maksutov–Cassegrain, the size of the instrument is limited due to the mass of the corrector plate.

Maksutov cameras

The Maksutov system can be used in a (rare) type of prime focus ultra wide field astronomical camera design similar to the Schmidt camera. Like the Schmidt camera, the Maksutov camera has a curved focal plane.

See also

References

  1. ^ John J. G. Savard, "Miscellaneous Musings"
  2. ^ a b Firefly astronomy dictionary by John Woodruff page 135 Google Books
  3. ^ a b Evolution of the Maksutov design
  4. ^ Dmitri Maksutov: The Man and His Telescope
  5. ^ a b Armstrong, E. B., "Geometrical Optics and the Schmidt Camera", Irish Astronomical Journal, vol. 1(2), p. 48
  6. ^ a b c d e Dmitri Maksutov: The Man and His Telescopes By Eduard Trigubov and Yuri Petrunin
  7. ^ "Astronomical optics" By D. J. Schroeder, page 202
  8. ^ Handbook of Optical Systems, Survey of Optical Instruments, by Herbert Gross, Hannfried Zügge, Fritz Blechinger, Bertram Achtner, page 806
  9. ^ Lens design fundamentals, by Rudolf Kingslake, page 313
  10. ^ http://www.company7.com/orion/catadioptric/argo6.html, SkyWatcher http://www.skywatchertelescope.net/swtinc/product.php?id=147&class1=1&class2=104, http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=701
  11. ^ James Mullaney, "A Buyer's and User's Guide to Astronomical Telescopes & Binoculars", page 46
  12. ^ A Photovisual Maksutov Cassegrain Telescope - by Marc René Baril . "Although convenient, this design is limited to focal ratios above f/15 unless an aspheric correction is applied to some element in the optical system"
  13. ^ Rutten, Harrie (1988). Telescope Optics: Evaluation and Design. Richmond, Va: Willman-Bell. ISBN 0-943396-18-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ A Photovisual Maksutov Cassegrain Telescope - by Marc René Baril
  15. ^ a b Patrick Moore, More small astronomical observatories, page 229
  16. ^ Maksutovs with Subaperture Correctors, Sky & Telescope, August, 1981, page 166-168, Conducted by Roger W. Sinnott
  17. ^ - Vladimir Sacek, telescope-optics.net, Notes on AMATEUR TELESCOPE OPTICS, CATADIOPTRIC TELESCOPES, 10.2.1
  18. ^ Mollise, Choosing and Using a New CAT: Getting the Most from Your Schmidt Cassegrain or any Catadioptric Telescope, page 103
  19. ^ [[http://books.google.com/books?id=x3LvAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&dq=%22Maksutov+newtonian%22+Coma++newtonian&hl=en&ei=kRQHTNmoBoP48AbRvZCSDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAQ Harrie G. J. Rutten, Martin A. M. van Venrooij, Telescope optics: evaluation and design - 374 pages
  20. ^ Rod Mollise, Choosing and Using a New CAT, page 101