User talk:Former user 20/Archive2

This is a permanent final warning, as determined by consensus. Any future violation of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, including but not limited to civility, harassment, use of sock puppets, neutrality, vanity, ownership, edit warring, disruption and failure to respect consensus may result in your being immediately banned from editing Wikipedia without further warning, and may result in an escalation to arbitration or an indefinite block.
This warning is for the information of the user and the administrators and should not be removed from the Talk page

A few words

The above is quite a shame. A handful of unbelievers and anti-fundamentalist Christians have led a brigade of hatred. What am I guilty of? Well, the long and short of it is: creating a number of Christian entries and nominating a number of non-notable, atheist entries for deletion. Does that sound worthy of the above? Of course not.

The sockpuppet allegations are absurd. What was the result of the "check user" (which checks IP addresses)? Last time I checked, there was no word at all. Therefore, all of these sockpuppet allegations are assumptions by people like User:JzG and User:Arbustoo. What's worse, they've assumed that they were right while indefinitely blocking people's accounts for no other reason.

Your hated for Christian fundamentalism and your burning bias to silence me and like-minded contributors has made you a person that we cannot deal with. It's completely up to them, but I imagine they will use other accounts to post because they don't want to talk to you.

It's simply detestable how you have hijacked certain entries like LBU and Pacific International University. You rather have no information on there than actually have pertinent and good information posted by a fundamentalist Christian. It's a sad day when an admin like you and some of your unbelieving, Christian-hating friends can rule Wikipedia and the Christian entries in it. It seems like you are incahoots with people like Arbustoo because you revert fundamentalist Christian entries and allow his, on the same entries. What made him the final word on Wikipedia entries? Perhaps he's a sock puppet of yours.

I'm going to avoid Wikipedia for awhile. However, I am going to encourage everyone I know to continue contributing. Therefore, don't expect to be hearing from me, but expect to be hearing from them.

May God have mercy on your soul, Guy. --Jason Gastrich 07:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Jason Gastrich, your comments are pointless. Why come back to continue this misery for yourself and others? Hope you can find peace of mind and join the community one day. --FloNight 07:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Funny how it's all somebody else's fault. The fifty-odd Wikipedians who endorsed the RfC are all biased, the people who innsert provable facts you don't like into articles are all biased, the people you insult are all biased, but you see yourself as whiter than snow. As Bertand Russell said, "the whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so certain of themselves and wiser me so full of doubts". And I have absolute confidence that you, in your hubris, will read that as meaning that we are the fools and faantics and you the "wiser men". As to hate, not me. I am supremely indifferent to you, but I am absolutely not indifferent to your attempts to hijack Wikipedia for the greater glory of Gastrich.

This does, however, highlight the absolute refusal to acknowledge any fault whatsoever which led to the RfC in the first place, and led to it being so strongly endorsed. A smart man would learn from this. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 10:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Tp put this in language Jason might understand, "(For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?) Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil. Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil." Jim62sch 12:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Just so lurkers and newbies know, Jim is an unbeliever who has rejected the lordship of Christ, yet likes to use Bible verses to try and belittle His followers. --Jason Gastrich 06:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

User page links

The Wikipedia page that states what we can have on our user pages clearly mentions that we can have "useful links". See here. Therefore, I'm going to revert JzG's deletion, so my useful links may be on there. --Jason Gastrich 07:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:EL and WP:SPAM. Reverting. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 09:33, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

WP is NOT a place to put your personal website. Have a link to it, but not a million. Your userpage reads like a giaganitc advertisement currently. Mike _{(T C)} 23:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

You should have seen it before I removed most of them! - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 23:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)